Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, , 121 - 127, 20.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.771545

Abstract

References

  • Andrews, A. W., Thomas, M. W., & Bohannon, R. W. (1996). Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Physical therapy, 76(3), 248-259.
  • Bag, A., Borman, A. S., Das, S., & Chawdhury, B. (2015). Comparative Study on Physical Fitness of Volleyball and Football Players in University Level.
  • Baumgartner, T. A., Oh, S., Chung, H., & Hales, D. (2002). Objectivity, reliability, and validity for a revised push-up test protocol. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6(4), 225-242.
  • Deurenberg, P., Weststrate, J. A., & Seidell, J. C. (1991). Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age-and sex-specific prediction formulas. British journal of nutrition, 65(2), 105-114.
  • Di Salvo, V., Baron, R., Tschan, H., Montero, F. C., Bachl, N., & Pigozzi, F. (2007). Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. International journal of sports medicine, 28(03), 222-227.
  • Fosang, A., & Baker, R. (2006). A method for comparing manual muscle strength measurements with joint moments during walking. Gait & Posture, 24(4), 406-411.
  • Jackson, A. W., Morrow Jr, J. R., Brill, P. A., Kohl III, H. W., Gordon, N. F., & Blair, S. N. (1998). Relations of sit-up and sit-and-reach tests to low back pain in adults. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 27(1), 22-26.
  • López-Miñarro, P. A., Andújar, P. S. d. B., & Rodrñguez-Garcña, P. L. (2009). A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students. Journal of sports science & medicine, 8(1), 116-122. Retrieved from
  • Marangoz, İ., & Baştürk, D. (2018). The Relationship Among Somatotype Structures, Leg Volume, Leg Mass, Anaerobic Strength and Flexibility of Elite Male Athletes in Different Branches. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(7), 130-137.
  • Meredith, M. D., & Welk, G. (2003). Fitnessgram: Test administration manual: Human Kinetics Publishers.
  • Mishra, M. K., Pandey, A. K., & Chaubey, D. (2015). A comparative study of VO2 max among the basketball, football, volleyball and hockey male players. International Journal of Appllied Research, 1(11), 245-247.
  • Peña, J., Moreno-Doutres, D., Coma, J., Cook, M., & Buscà, B. (2018). Anthropometric and fitness profile of high-level basketball, handball and volleyball players. Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte, 11(1), 30-35.
  • Singh, A. (2017). Comparative study of agility, reaction time, strength and flexibility measures of volleyball and basketball players. International Journal of Sport, Exercise and Health Research. 2, 270-272.
  • Singh, R. (2019). Motor fitness variables among inter university football and volleyball players: a comparative study. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education, 4(1): 1961-1964
  • Singh, T. N., & Kaur, H. (2019). Muscular strength and muscular endurance among national level male players. Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 4(1): 05-07
  • Torres-Unda, J., Zarrazquin, I., Gil, J., Ruiz, F., Irazusta, A., Kortajarena, M., Irazusta, J. (2013). Anthropometric, physiological and maturational characteristics in selected elite and non-elite male adolescent basketball players. Journal of sports sciences, 31(2), 196-203.

Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players

Year 2020, , 121 - 127, 20.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.771545

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the selected physical and performance variables of university-level basketball, football and volleyball players. The present study was conducted by 23 students studying in the faculty of health sciences and playing in their school's Football (n = 7), Volleyball (n = 8), Basketball (n = 8) teams and the age ranged from 18-23 years. Several physical and physiological characteristics of the students were evaluated. These characteristics are weight, height, BKI, flexibility, isometric muscle strength, muscular endurance, aerobic and anaerobic performance. While comparing between sports disciplines, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for data with normal distribution, and Kruskal Wallis test was used for non-distributed data. The results of the study indicate that there was a significant difference among Basketball, Volleyball and Football in relation to VO2 Max, muscle strength, anaerobic power. The aerobic performance test was significantly better in volleyball (p ≤ 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the results of physical properties, muscle endurance and flexibility among teams (p>0.05). These results will provide useful information for university level athletes to be selected according to sports-specific physical fitness criteria and that they should receive training by team coaches accordingly.

References

  • Andrews, A. W., Thomas, M. W., & Bohannon, R. W. (1996). Normative values for isometric muscle force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers. Physical therapy, 76(3), 248-259.
  • Bag, A., Borman, A. S., Das, S., & Chawdhury, B. (2015). Comparative Study on Physical Fitness of Volleyball and Football Players in University Level.
  • Baumgartner, T. A., Oh, S., Chung, H., & Hales, D. (2002). Objectivity, reliability, and validity for a revised push-up test protocol. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 6(4), 225-242.
  • Deurenberg, P., Weststrate, J. A., & Seidell, J. C. (1991). Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age-and sex-specific prediction formulas. British journal of nutrition, 65(2), 105-114.
  • Di Salvo, V., Baron, R., Tschan, H., Montero, F. C., Bachl, N., & Pigozzi, F. (2007). Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. International journal of sports medicine, 28(03), 222-227.
  • Fosang, A., & Baker, R. (2006). A method for comparing manual muscle strength measurements with joint moments during walking. Gait & Posture, 24(4), 406-411.
  • Jackson, A. W., Morrow Jr, J. R., Brill, P. A., Kohl III, H. W., Gordon, N. F., & Blair, S. N. (1998). Relations of sit-up and sit-and-reach tests to low back pain in adults. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 27(1), 22-26.
  • López-Miñarro, P. A., Andújar, P. S. d. B., & Rodrñguez-Garcña, P. L. (2009). A comparison of the sit-and-reach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students. Journal of sports science & medicine, 8(1), 116-122. Retrieved from
  • Marangoz, İ., & Baştürk, D. (2018). The Relationship Among Somatotype Structures, Leg Volume, Leg Mass, Anaerobic Strength and Flexibility of Elite Male Athletes in Different Branches. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(7), 130-137.
  • Meredith, M. D., & Welk, G. (2003). Fitnessgram: Test administration manual: Human Kinetics Publishers.
  • Mishra, M. K., Pandey, A. K., & Chaubey, D. (2015). A comparative study of VO2 max among the basketball, football, volleyball and hockey male players. International Journal of Appllied Research, 1(11), 245-247.
  • Peña, J., Moreno-Doutres, D., Coma, J., Cook, M., & Buscà, B. (2018). Anthropometric and fitness profile of high-level basketball, handball and volleyball players. Revista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte, 11(1), 30-35.
  • Singh, A. (2017). Comparative study of agility, reaction time, strength and flexibility measures of volleyball and basketball players. International Journal of Sport, Exercise and Health Research. 2, 270-272.
  • Singh, R. (2019). Motor fitness variables among inter university football and volleyball players: a comparative study. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education, 4(1): 1961-1964
  • Singh, T. N., & Kaur, H. (2019). Muscular strength and muscular endurance among national level male players. Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 4(1): 05-07
  • Torres-Unda, J., Zarrazquin, I., Gil, J., Ruiz, F., Irazusta, A., Kortajarena, M., Irazusta, J. (2013). Anthropometric, physiological and maturational characteristics in selected elite and non-elite male adolescent basketball players. Journal of sports sciences, 31(2), 196-203.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Sports Medicine
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Meltem Koç

Özge İpek Dongaz

Banu Bayar

Kılıçhan Bayar

Publication Date December 20, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Koç, M., İpek Dongaz, Ö., Bayar, B., Bayar, K. (2020). Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, 3(2), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.771545
AMA Koç M, İpek Dongaz Ö, Bayar B, Bayar K. Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences. December 2020;3(2):121-127. doi:10.33438/ijdshs.771545
Chicago Koç, Meltem, Özge İpek Dongaz, Banu Bayar, and Kılıçhan Bayar. “Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players”. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences 3, no. 2 (December 2020): 121-27. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.771545.
EndNote Koç M, İpek Dongaz Ö, Bayar B, Bayar K (December 1, 2020) Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences 3 2 121–127.
IEEE M. Koç, Ö. İpek Dongaz, B. Bayar, and K. Bayar, “Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players”, International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2020, doi: 10.33438/ijdshs.771545.
ISNAD Koç, Meltem et al. “Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players”. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences 3/2 (December 2020), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.771545.
JAMA Koç M, İpek Dongaz Ö, Bayar B, Bayar K. Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences. 2020;3:121–127.
MLA Koç, Meltem et al. “Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players”. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, pp. 121-7, doi:10.33438/ijdshs.771545.
Vancouver Koç M, İpek Dongaz Ö, Bayar B, Bayar K. Comparison of Selected Physical and Performance Characteristics in University-Level Male Basketball, Football and Volleyball Players. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences. 2020;3(2):121-7.


Flag Counter