Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023), 131 - 140, 25.02.2024
https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1371249

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact of using one of the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) type cooperative learning models on mastery of basic basketball techniques in grade VII junior high school students. This study used an experimental method using a randomize pretest posttest control group design. A total of 75 students were involved in this study, and were divided into two groups, namely 37 experimental groups and 38 people as a control group. The number is obtained from the entire class VII taken using cluster random sampling. The data collection technique uses a type of skill test of basic passing, shooting and dribbling techniques in basketball games that emphasize assessing their movements. The data analysis technique uses the help of the IBM SPSS version 25 program with an independent sample t-test analysis type at a confidence level of 0.05. Based on the results of the analysis obtained, researchers concluded that there is a significant average difference between the STAD type cooperative model and the direct teaching model, where the STAD model has a greater influence on basic basketball technical skills. It is expected that PJOK teachers pay more attention to the characteristics of students, so that they are able to apply models that are in accordance with their characteristics.

References

  • Amirreza Naseri, Majid Mohammadi Moghaddam, Martin Grimmer, M. A. S. (2023). Passive hydraulic prosthetic foot to improve the push-off during walking. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 172. [CrossRef]
  • Cherelle, P., Grosu, V., Flynn, L., Junius, K., Moltedo, M., Vanderborght, B., & Lefeber, D. (2017). The Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 3—Locking mechanisms, actuator design, control and experiments with an amputee. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 91, 327–336. [CrossRef]
  • Childers, W. L., & Takahashi, K. Z. (2018). Increasing prosthetic foot energy return affects whole-body mechanics during walking on level ground and slopes. Scientific Reports, 8(1). [CrossRef]
  • DeWees, T. (2019). Transtibial prosthetics. Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation, 605–634. [CrossRef] Dianlei Han, Rui Zhang, Qingqiu Cao, Lei Jiang, J. L. (2021). Research in the mechanical model of bionic foot intruding into sands with different physical characteristics. Journal of Terramechanics, 98. [CrossRef]
  • Emily S. Matijevich, Eric C. Honert, Yang Fan, Gilbert Lam, B. M. N. (2022). A foot and footwear mechanical power theoretical framework: Towards understanding energy storage and return in running footwear. Journal of Biomechanics, 141. [CrossRef]
  • Fylstra, B. L., Lee, I. C., Huang, S., Brandt, A., Lewek, M. D., & Huang, H. (Helen). (2020). Human-prosthesis coordination: A preliminary study exploring coordination with a powered ankle-foot prosthesis. Clinical Biomechanics, 80(January), 105171. [CrossRef]
  • Hoque, M. E., Riham, S. A. H., & Shuvo, M. A. A. (2023). A cost-effective prosthetic leg: Design and development. Hybrid Advances, 2(October 2022), 100017. [CrossRef]
  • Kieran M. Nichols, P. G. A. (2023). Sensitivity of lower-limb joint mechanics to prosthetic forefoot stiffness with a variable stiffness foot in level-ground walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 147. [CrossRef]
  • Lestari, W. D., & Adyono, N. (2022). Analysis of Ankle-Foot Design for Transtibial Prosthesis Components to Increase The Flexibility using the Finite Element Method. TEKNIK, 43(3), 272–279. [CrossRef]
  • Proebsting, E., Altenburg, B., Bellmann, M., Schmalz, T., & Krug, K. (2020). Effects on prosthetic foot ankle power on transfemoral amputee gait. Gait & Posture, 81, 285–286. [CrossRef] ,Rui Zhang, Xumin Sun, Dianlei Han, Rui Zhang, Hua Zhang, Jia Ma, Lige Wen, M. Z. (2023). A bionic mechanical foot with adaptive variable postures travelling on sand. Journal of Terramechanics, 107. [CrossRef]
  • Schlafly, M., & Reed, K. B. (2020). Novel passive ankle-foot prosthesis mimics able-bodied ankle angles and ground reaction forces. Clinical Biomechanics, 72, 202–210. [CrossRef]
  • Umesh K. Dwivedi, Shashank Mishra, V. P. (2023). Rapid prototyping. In Advances in Biomedical Polymers and Composites (pp. 315–341). [CrossRef]
  • Yu, C. huang, Hung, Y. C., Lin, Y. H., Chen, G. X., Wei, S. H., Huang, C. H., & Chen, C. S. (2014). A 3D mathematical model to predict spinal joint and hip joint force for trans-tibial amputees with different SACH foot pylon adjustments. Gait and Posture, 40(4), 545–548. [CrossRef]
  • Zelik, K. E., & Honert, E. C. (2018). Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment. Journal of Biomechanics, 75, 1–12. [CrossRef]
Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023), 131 - 140, 25.02.2024
https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1371249

Abstract

References

  • Amirreza Naseri, Majid Mohammadi Moghaddam, Martin Grimmer, M. A. S. (2023). Passive hydraulic prosthetic foot to improve the push-off during walking. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 172. [CrossRef]
  • Cherelle, P., Grosu, V., Flynn, L., Junius, K., Moltedo, M., Vanderborght, B., & Lefeber, D. (2017). The Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic Foot 3—Locking mechanisms, actuator design, control and experiments with an amputee. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 91, 327–336. [CrossRef]
  • Childers, W. L., & Takahashi, K. Z. (2018). Increasing prosthetic foot energy return affects whole-body mechanics during walking on level ground and slopes. Scientific Reports, 8(1). [CrossRef]
  • DeWees, T. (2019). Transtibial prosthetics. Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation, 605–634. [CrossRef] Dianlei Han, Rui Zhang, Qingqiu Cao, Lei Jiang, J. L. (2021). Research in the mechanical model of bionic foot intruding into sands with different physical characteristics. Journal of Terramechanics, 98. [CrossRef]
  • Emily S. Matijevich, Eric C. Honert, Yang Fan, Gilbert Lam, B. M. N. (2022). A foot and footwear mechanical power theoretical framework: Towards understanding energy storage and return in running footwear. Journal of Biomechanics, 141. [CrossRef]
  • Fylstra, B. L., Lee, I. C., Huang, S., Brandt, A., Lewek, M. D., & Huang, H. (Helen). (2020). Human-prosthesis coordination: A preliminary study exploring coordination with a powered ankle-foot prosthesis. Clinical Biomechanics, 80(January), 105171. [CrossRef]
  • Hoque, M. E., Riham, S. A. H., & Shuvo, M. A. A. (2023). A cost-effective prosthetic leg: Design and development. Hybrid Advances, 2(October 2022), 100017. [CrossRef]
  • Kieran M. Nichols, P. G. A. (2023). Sensitivity of lower-limb joint mechanics to prosthetic forefoot stiffness with a variable stiffness foot in level-ground walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 147. [CrossRef]
  • Lestari, W. D., & Adyono, N. (2022). Analysis of Ankle-Foot Design for Transtibial Prosthesis Components to Increase The Flexibility using the Finite Element Method. TEKNIK, 43(3), 272–279. [CrossRef]
  • Proebsting, E., Altenburg, B., Bellmann, M., Schmalz, T., & Krug, K. (2020). Effects on prosthetic foot ankle power on transfemoral amputee gait. Gait & Posture, 81, 285–286. [CrossRef] ,Rui Zhang, Xumin Sun, Dianlei Han, Rui Zhang, Hua Zhang, Jia Ma, Lige Wen, M. Z. (2023). A bionic mechanical foot with adaptive variable postures travelling on sand. Journal of Terramechanics, 107. [CrossRef]
  • Schlafly, M., & Reed, K. B. (2020). Novel passive ankle-foot prosthesis mimics able-bodied ankle angles and ground reaction forces. Clinical Biomechanics, 72, 202–210. [CrossRef]
  • Umesh K. Dwivedi, Shashank Mishra, V. P. (2023). Rapid prototyping. In Advances in Biomedical Polymers and Composites (pp. 315–341). [CrossRef]
  • Yu, C. huang, Hung, Y. C., Lin, Y. H., Chen, G. X., Wei, S. H., Huang, C. H., & Chen, C. S. (2014). A 3D mathematical model to predict spinal joint and hip joint force for trans-tibial amputees with different SACH foot pylon adjustments. Gait and Posture, 40(4), 545–548. [CrossRef]
  • Zelik, K. E., & Honert, E. C. (2018). Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment. Journal of Biomechanics, 75, 1–12. [CrossRef]
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Physical Training and Sports Pedagogy
Journal Section Original Article
Authors

Faiz Faozi 0009-0002-2299-4280

Firmansyah Dlis This is me 0000-0002-2799-9745

Samsudin Samsudin This is me 0000-0003-1565-4202

Sumbara Hambali 0000-0003-2827-0128

Dani Nur Riyadi This is me 0000-0003-0691-384X

Early Pub Date February 8, 2024
Publication Date February 25, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 7 Issue: (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023)

Cite

APA Faozi, F., Dlis, F., Samsudin, S., Hambali, S., et al. (2024). Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, 7((Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1371249
AMA Faozi F, Dlis F, Samsudin S, Hambali S, Riyadi DN. Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques. International Journal of Disabilities Sports &Health Sciences. February 2024;7((Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023):131-140. doi:10.33438/ijdshs.1371249
Chicago Faozi, Faiz, Firmansyah Dlis, Samsudin Samsudin, Sumbara Hambali, and Dani Nur Riyadi. “Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques”. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences 7, no. (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023) (February 2024): 131-40. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1371249.
EndNote Faozi F, Dlis F, Samsudin S, Hambali S, Riyadi DN (February 1, 2024) Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences 7 (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023) 131–140.
IEEE F. Faozi, F. Dlis, S. Samsudin, S. Hambali, and D. N. Riyadi, “Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques”, International Journal of Disabilities Sports &Health Sciences, vol. 7, no. (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023), pp. 131–140, 2024, doi: 10.33438/ijdshs.1371249.
ISNAD Faozi, Faiz et al. “Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques”. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences 7/(Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023) (February 2024), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1371249.
JAMA Faozi F, Dlis F, Samsudin S, Hambali S, Riyadi DN. Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques. International Journal of Disabilities Sports &Health Sciences. 2024;7:131–140.
MLA Faozi, Faiz et al. “Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques”. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, vol. 7, no. (Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023), 2024, pp. 131-40, doi:10.33438/ijdshs.1371249.
Vancouver Faozi F, Dlis F, Samsudin S, Hambali S, Riyadi DN. Cooperative Learning Vs Direct Teaching in Basketball: Effects on Junior High School Students Basic Techniques. International Journal of Disabilities Sports &Health Sciences. 2024;7((Special Issue 1): International Conference on Sport Science and Health (ICSSH, 2023):131-40.


Flag Counter