Research Article

Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation

Volume: 5 Number: 1 April 5, 2018
EN

Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation

Abstract

Very Large Photovoltaic Solar Power Plants (VLPVPPs) are a major revolutionary step up not only for economies of scale, but also for %100 renewable power Global Grid. Their designs and investments should be performed in an environmentally friendly, fair, open to very large to small private investors, transparent and reducing relative income inequality approaches. Their investments will easily be possible with new investment models (%0 interest load, %100 private equity, open investment for ordinary people, project developers, private companies etc. with a constraint-based shareholder structuring). These revolutionary investment models will play an important and game changing role. VLPVPPs’ early engineering and investment analysis can be performed on many software. Therefore, validation and verification efforts of those software in advance on the operational PVPPs are essential. This research study aims to present a validation and verification accomplishment of the Solar Star Projects (597 MWAC, 747,3 MWDC) (Solar Star I: 318 MWAC, 397,8 MWDC & Solar Star II: 279 MWAC, 349,5 MWDC) in Antelope Valley near Rosamond, Kern and Los Angeles counties, California, United States with the PVWatts Version 5 model of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) System Advisor Model (SAM) Version 2017.9.5. The location and resource, system design data and information of the Solar Star Projects (I & II) are presented based on open source information and personal communications. The Solar Star Projects SAM software models' are simulated on a personal computer (PC) (Windows 10 Pro, Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 650 @ 3.20 GHZ, 6,00 GB RAM) with the internet connection. The results of eight simple simulations, one parametric simulation and one stochastic simulation are compared with the actual generation data by help of some statistical performance measures (e.g. annual model/actual: 100,0%, annual model/actual: 100,1%, absolute maximum forecast error 39.276 MWh, mean absolute error 11.554 MWh, geometric mean absolute error 8.924 MWh, mean square error 2.662.330.229 MWh, root mean square error 51.597 MWh).

Keywords

References

  1. Saracoglu, B.O., 2014, “An Experimental Fuzzy Expert System Based Application For The Go/No-Go Decisions To The Geospatial Investigation Studies Of The Regions Of The Very Large Concentrated Solar Power Plants In The European Supergrid Concept”, WSC 18 The 18th Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, 1-12 December, 4(1), 223-234, World Wide Web.
  2. http://www.greenroof.hrt.msu.edu/what-is-green-roof/index.html
  3. http://www.greenroofsolutions.com/index.html
  4. http://www.greenroofers.co.uk/
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/project/Very-Large-Photovoltaic-Solar-Power-Plant-Conceptual-Design
  6. http://analysis.newenergyupdate.com/csp-today/csp-operators-urged-learn-ramp-faults-lower-cost-finance
  7. https://blog.ipleaders.in/solar-power-financing/
  8. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timothyspangler/2011/04/05/islamic-funds-sharia-law-and-investment-structures/#670d685c5260

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 5, 2018

Submission Date

March 9, 2018

Acceptance Date

March 26, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Saracoglu, B. O. (2018). Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 5(1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.403748
AMA
1.Saracoglu BO. Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation. IJEAT. 2018;5(1):13-28. doi:10.31593/ijeat.403748
Chicago
Saracoglu, Burak Omer. 2018. “Solar Star Projects SAM Version 2017.9.5 PVwats Version 5 Model Case Study & Validation”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 5 (1): 13-28. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.403748.
EndNote
Saracoglu BO (April 1, 2018) Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 5 1 13–28.
IEEE
[1]B. O. Saracoglu, “Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation”, IJEAT, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–28, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.31593/ijeat.403748.
ISNAD
Saracoglu, Burak Omer. “Solar Star Projects SAM Version 2017.9.5 PVwats Version 5 Model Case Study & Validation”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 5/1 (April 1, 2018): 13-28. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.403748.
JAMA
1.Saracoglu BO. Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation. IJEAT. 2018;5:13–28.
MLA
Saracoglu, Burak Omer. “Solar Star Projects SAM Version 2017.9.5 PVwats Version 5 Model Case Study & Validation”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, Apr. 2018, pp. 13-28, doi:10.31593/ijeat.403748.
Vancouver
1.Burak Omer Saracoglu. Solar star projects SAM version 2017.9.5 PVwats version 5 model case study & validation. IJEAT. 2018 Apr. 1;5(1):13-28. doi:10.31593/ijeat.403748

Cited By