Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, goat and chicken manure for sustainable biogas production

Year 2020, , 120 - 125, 31.12.2020

Sunil Prasad Lohani

https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.748982

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of food waste alone is not very stable due to its acidic nature and high biodegradability. Co-digestion of food waste with alkaline substrate such as chicken manure and goat manure could enhance process stability and biogas yield. In this study comparison of mono digestion of food waste with 8% total solid content at an ambient temperature and co-digestion of food waste, goat and chicken manure at ratio 5:2:3 and 2:1:1 with 8% total solid content at an ambient temperature in hilly region of Nepal were carried out. Biogas yield was highest with mixing ratio of 5:2:3 with the values of 109 ml/gVS followed by mixing ratio of 2:1:1 with the values of 80 ml/gVS. Mono digestion of food waste was not stable and broke down after two weeks of operation. Findings from this study suggests that co-digestion could be a suitable method for addressing the problem related to stability in a single substrate digestion in an ambient temperature condition. Moreover, mixing ratio of co-digestion substrates is important for improved biogas production. Co-digestion of food waste with goat and chicken manure could be a practical approach for sustainable clean energy production and waste management in context of Nepal.

Keywords

Ambient temperature, Anaerobic, Biogas yield, Co-digestion, Sustainable

Supporting Institution

University Grant Commission Nepal

Project Number

FRG-73/74-ENGG-02

References

• Mata-Alvarez, J., Macé, S. and Llabrés, P. 2000. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresource Technology, 74(1), 3–16.
• Lohani, S. P. and Havukainen, J. Anaerobic Digestion: Factors Affecting Anaerobic Digestion Process, in: Varjani, S., Gnansounou, E., Gurunathan, B., Pant, D., Zakaria, Z., Waste Bioremediation, Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Springer, Singapore, 2018, 343-359.
• Weiland, P. 2010. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(4), 849-60.
• Lesteur, M., Bellon-Maurel, V., Gonzalez, X., Latrille, E., Roger, J. M., Junqua, G. and Steyer, J. P. 2010. Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: A review. Process Biochemistry, 45(4), 431–440.
• Jingura, R.M. and Kamusoko, R. 2017. Methods for determination of bio methane potential of feedstock's: a review. Biofuel Research Journal, 4(2), 573-586.
• Lohani, S.P. 2020. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Cow Manure. Iranian Journal of Energy and Environment, 11(1), 57-60.
• Cardona, L., Levrard, C., Guenne, A, Chapleur, O. and Mazéas, L. 2019. Co-digestion of wastewater sludge: Choosing the optimal blend. Waste Management, 87, 772-781.
• Mehariya, S., Patel, A. K., Obulisamy, P. K., Punniyakottia, E. and Wong, J. W. C. 2018. Co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge for methane production: Current status and perspective. Bioresource Technology, 265, 519-531.
• Demirci, G. G. and Demirer, G. N. 2004. Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Bioresource Technology, 93(2), 109-117.
• Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J. L., Guwy, A. J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P. and van Lier, J. B. 2009. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Science and Technology, 59(5), 927-934.
• Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H. and Vigil, S. Integrated Solid Waste Management, McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 1993.
• Bah, H., Zhang, W., Wu, S., Qi, D., Kizito, S. and Dong, R. 2014. Evaluation of batch anaerobic co digestion of palm pressed fiber and cattle manure under mesophilic conditions. Waste Management, 34, 1984-1991.
• Li, Z., Chen, Z., Ye, H., Wang, Y., Luo, W., Chang, J-S. Li, Q. and He, N. 2018. Anaerobic co digestion of sewage sludge and food waste for hydrogen and VFA production with microbial community analysis. Waste Management, 78, 789-799.
• Ebner, H. J., Labatut, A. R., Lodge, S. J., Williamson, A. A. and Trabold, A. T. 2016. Anaerobic co-digestion of commercial food waste and dairy manure: Characterizing biochemical parameters and synergistic effects. Waste Management, 52, 286-294.
• Capson-Tojo, G., Trably, E., Rouez, M., Crest, M., Steyer, J-P., Delgenès, J-P. and Escudié, R. 2017. Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste and cardboard at different substrate loads, solid contents and co-digestion proportions. Bioresource Technology, 233, 166-175.
• Cogan, M. and Antizar-Ladislao, B. 2016. The ability of macroalgae to stabilise and optimise the anaerobic digestion of household food waste. Biomass and Bioenergy, 86, 146-155.
• Kang, C. M. 2015. Increased anaerobic production of methane by co-digestion of sludge with microalgal biomass and food waste leachate. Bioresource Technology, 189, 409-412.
• Curry, N. and Pillay, P. 2012. Biogas prediction and design of a food waste to energy system for the urban environment. Renewable Energy, 41, 200-209.
• Marañón, E. 2012. Co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge to increase biogas production. Waste Management, 32(10), 1821-1825.
• Aichinger, P., Wadhawan, T., Kuprian, M., Higgins, M., Ebner, C., Fimml, C., Murthy, S. and Wett, B. 2015. Synergistic co-digestion of solid-organic-waste and municipal sewage-sludge: 1 plus 1 equals more than 2 in terms of biogas production and solids reduction. Water Research, 87, 416-423.
• El-Mashad, H. M. and Zhang, R. 2010. Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource Technology, 101, 4021–4028.
• Mousaa, H., Obaidatb, A., Khaledb, H.B., Alawanehb, A. and Tarawneh, A. 2016. Experimental Investigation of Biogas Production from Kitchen Waste Mixed with Chicken Manure. The Journal of Engineering Research, 13(2), 115-123.
• Raposo, F., Banks, C. J., Siegert, I., Heaven, S. and Borja, R. 2009. Influence of inoculum to substrate ratio on the biochemical methane potential of maize in batch tests. Process Biochemistry, 41(6), 1444-1450.
• Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Panico, A. and Pirozzi, F. 2012. Enhanced bio-methane production from co-digestion of different organic wastes. Environmental Technology, 33(24), 2733-2740.
• Callaghan, F. J., Wase, D.A.J., Thayanithy, K. and Forster, C. F. 1999. Co-digestion of waste organic solids: Batch studies. Bioresource Technology, 67(2), 117–122.
• El-Mashad, H. M. and Zhang, R. 2010. Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource Technology, 101(11), 4021–4028.
• Zamanzadeh, M., Hagen, L. H., Svensson, K., Linjordet, R. and Horn, S. J. 2017. Biogas production from food waste via co-digestion and digestion- effects on performance and microbial ecology. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17664.
• Zhang, L., Lee, Y.W. and Jahng, D. 2011. Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and piggery wastewater: Focusing on the role of trace elements. Bioresource Technology, 102(8), 5048–5059.
• Hegde, S. and Trabold, T. A. 2019. Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste with Unconventional Co-Substrates for Stable Biogas Production at High Organic Loading Rates. Sustainability, 11(14), 3875.