POLICY COHERENCE, EFFECTIVENESS, OPENNESS AND PARTICIPATION IN EUROPEAN UNION

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 1 - 10, 01.06.2010

Ilter Unlukaplan

Abstract

Openness, participation, accountability, effectiveness and the coherence are the indicators of good
governance and the changes proposed in the White Paper, adopted by the European Commission
in July 2001. The fundamental object of the White Paper is to establish more democratic forms of
governance at the different levels.
In this paper, canonical correlation analysis has been employed to examine the relationship
between the indicators of good governance, namely the sets of “policy coherence/effectiveness”
and “openness/participation” in EU-15 countries.

Keywords

E-Government, Good Governance, Policy Coherence, Openness, Participation

References

• Bouckaert, Geert, Steven van de Walle (2003), “Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User
• Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol.69, No.3, pp.323-343. Commision of the European Communities (2001), “European Governance: A White Paper”,
• Brussels: Commision of the European Communities. Demmers, Jolle, Alex E.Fernández Jilberto, Barbara Hogenboom (2004), “Good Governance and Democracy in a World of Neoliberal Regimes”, (in Demmers, Jolle, Alex E.Fernández Jilberto,
• Barbara Hogenboom- Eds., Good Governance in the Era of Global Neoliberalism Conflict and Depolitisation in Latin America, Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa), London: Routledge, pp. 1-32. Eberlein, Burkard, Dieter Kerwer (2004), “New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical
• Perspective”, JCMS, Vol.42, No. 1, pp.121-142. EUROSTAT (2009), Good Governance Statistics, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu, [Accessed 12.2009]
• Hair, Joseph.F, Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, William. C. Black (1998), Multivariate
• Data Analysis, Fifth Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int. Inc. Hooghe, L., G. Marks (2001), Multi – Level Governance and European Integration, Lanham:
• Rowman & Littlefield. Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001), “The Governance Approach to European Integration”, Journal of
• Common Market Studies, Vol.39, No. 2, pp.245-264. Kachigian, Sam Kash. (1991), Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Conceptual Introduction, New York: Radius Press.
• Manly, Brian, F. J. (2005), Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, London: Chapman&Hall/CRC.
• Marks, G. (1993), “Structural Policy and Multilevel Governance in the EC”, (In: Cafruny, A. and G. Rosenthal-Eds., The State of the European Community II), Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.
• Rencher, A. C. (2001), Methods of Multivariate Analysis, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
• Rotberg, R. (2004), “Strengthening Governance Ranking Countries Would Help”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol.28, No.1, pp.71-81.
• UCLA (2009) , Stata Annotated Output: Canonical Correlation Analysis , UCLA Stat.Cons. Serv., http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/output/Stata_CCA.htm [Accessed 1.12.2009]
• United Nations (2007), “Public Governance Indicators: A Literature Review”, Department of
• Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations.