Research Article

COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL

Volume: 6 Number: 2 October 31, 2021
EN

COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL

Abstract

Experimental studies are very important in designing of a new product. In the aerodynamic designs, wind tunnel tests are commonly used in experimental studies. In the experimental studies accuracy is the most critical point to verify the results. Laminar flow is preferred at test section to obtain accurate results. Turbulence intensity is the main drawback of the wind tunnel tests. Hence in this study, turbulence intensity of the hexagonal, square and circular sectioned honeycomb is investigated. In the numerical studies, a circular sectioned subsonic wind tunnel is used. The computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis of three-dimensional (3D) flow in a circular sectioned desktop size wind tunnel is used for comparison.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Wang Y, Song Y, Yu J, Chen F. Effect of the injection orientation and position on the leakage flow in a honeycomb-tip turbine cascade. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 2019; 144: 118633
  2. [2] Wang Y, Yu J, Song Y, Chen F. Parameter optimization of the composite honeycomb tip in a türbine cascade. Energy 2020; 197: 117236
  3. [3] Zaniewski D, Klimaszewski P, Klonowicz P, Lampart P, Witanowski Ł, Je˛drzejewski Ł, Suchocki T, Antczak Ł. Performance of the honeycomb type sealing’s in organic vapor micro turbines. Energy 2021; 226: 120242
  4. [4] Wang Y, Song Y, Yu J, Chen F. Effect of cooling injection on the leakage flow of a turbine cascade with honeycomb tip. Applied Thermal Engineering 2018; 133: 690–703
  5. [5] Massinia D, Facchinia B, Miciob M, Bianchinib C, Ceccherinic A, Innocenti L. Analysis of flat plate honeycomb seals aerodynamic losses: effects of clearance. Energy Procedia 2014; 45: 502 – 511
  6. [6] Yi L, Changchuan X, Chao Y, Jialin C. Gust response analysis and wind tunnel test for a high-aspect ratio wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2016; 29(1): 91–103
  7. [7] Koreanschi A, Gabor O S, Acotto J, Brianchon G, Portier G, Botez R M, Mamou M, Mebarki Y. Optimization and design of an aircraft’s morphing wing-tip demonstrator for drag reduction at low speeds, Part II - Experimental validation using Infra-Red transition measurement from Wind Tunnel tests. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2017; 30(1): 164–174
  8. [8] Joe M, Kammegne T, Botez R M, Grigorie L T, Mamou M, Mebarki Y. Proportional fuzzy feed-forward architecture control validation by wind tunnel tests of a morphing wing. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2017; 30(2): 561–576

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 31, 2021

Submission Date

November 3, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 17, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Göv, İ. (2021). COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, 6(2), 38-49. https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL
AMA
1.Göv İ. COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL. IJEES. 2021;6(2):38-49. https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL
Chicago
Göv, İbrahim. 2021. “COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL”. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences 6 (2): 38-49. https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL.
EndNote
Göv İ (October 1, 2021) COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences 6 2 38–49.
IEEE
[1]İ. Göv, “COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL”, IJEES, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 38–49, Oct. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL
ISNAD
Göv, İbrahim. “COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL”. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences 6/2 (October 1, 2021): 38-49. https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL.
JAMA
1.Göv İ. COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL. IJEES. 2021;6:38–49.
MLA
Göv, İbrahim. “COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL”. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, Oct. 2021, pp. 38-49, https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL.
Vancouver
1.İbrahim Göv. COMPARISON OF HEXAGONAL, SQUARE AND CIRCULAR SECTIONED HONEYCOMB PERFORMANCE IN A WIND TUNNEL. IJEES [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 1;6(2):38-49. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA73PH25AL

IMPORTANT NOTES

No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners, unless the use is a fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research or review. The authors reserve the right that their material can be used for purely educational and research purposes. All the authors are responsible for the originality and plagiarism, multiple publication, disclosure and conflicts of interest and fundamental errors in the published works.

*Please note that  All the authors are responsible for the originality and plagiarism, multiple publication, disclosure and conflicts of interest and fundamental errors in the published works. Author(s) submitting a manuscript for publication in IJEES also accept that the manuscript may go through screening for plagiarism check using IThenticate software. For experimental works involving animals, approvals from relevant ethics committee should have been obtained beforehand assuring that the experiment was conducted according to relevant national or international guidelines on care and use of laboratory animals.  Authors may be requested to provide evidence to this end.
 
**Authors are highly recommended to obey the IJEES policies regarding copyrights/Licensing and ethics before submitting their manuscripts.


Copyright © 2026. AA. All rights reserved