REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND ENHANCING DESIGN CAPABILITY OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES
Abstract
This article addresses the energy saving potential and environmental benefits of recycled polypropylene (PP) usage as a construction material. PP polymer is a versatile material that can be used as films or fibres which makes it one of the most four selling and consumed plastics. PP usage accounts for 75% of the worldwide usage of plastics in the world, this plastic material accumulates day by day in landfill damaging the ecosystem and environment enormously for the last decades. The objective of this study is to reduce waste, find a greater resource productivity, and help decrease the environmental impacts of construction materials manufacturing, and consump-tion (convert Waste to Wealth). In this study, two samples having the same volume (1m³) of self-compacting concrete (SCC); (one consists of PP fibre while the other one doesn’t) have been compared in accordance with their Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) by using GaBi software. The emission to air and emission to fresh water for SCC reinforced concrete and PP reinforced concrete are calculated to be 4.53x105, 5.66x106; and 2.51x105, 2.78x105 respectively for 100 years of life cycle. The results showed that, for a 100 years of life cycle, the emissions to air and fresh water should be decreased by 44.59% and 91.99% respectively. The biggest benefit was mitigating the area occupied by plastic waste in landfill in bulky quantities, and also preventing lead disposal happening due to disposal of the PP based materials.
Keywords
References
- [1] Alavi Nia, A., Hedayatian, M., Nili, M., & Sabet, V. A. (2012). An experimental and numerical study on how SCC and polypropylene fibres affect the impact resistance in fibre-reinforced concrete. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 46, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.01.009
- [2] Alhozaimy, A. M., Soroushian, P., & Mirza, F. (1996). Mechanical properties of polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete and the effects of pozzolanic materials. Cement and Concrete Composites, 18(2), 85-92.
- [3] Al-Kadi, Q. N., Alhasana, M. B., & Al Qadi, A. N. (2016). Spalling Assessment of Self- Compacting Concrete with and Without Polypropylene Fibres at Elevated Temperatures. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 6(6), 82-93.
- [4] Atiş, C. D., Çelik, C., Çelik, Ö., & Karahan, O. (2009). Influence of activator on the strength and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag mortar. Construction and building materials, 23(1), 548-555.
- [5] Atmaca, A., & Atmaca, N. (2018). “Energy efficiency and engineering applications” in conjunction with the “International energy and engineering conference 2016”(Oct 13– 14, 2016).
- [6] Atmaca, A. (2016). Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of residential buildings in south east of Turkey: part 1—review and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21(6), 831-846.
- [7] Atmaca, A., & Atmaca, N. (2016). Comparative life cycle energy and cost analysis of post-disaster temporary housings. Applied energy, 171, 429-443.
- [8] Atmaca, A. (2018). Sustainable life span prediction of shelters constructed in refugee camps in Turkey. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 3(1), 5–12.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
January 1, 2019
Submission Date
June 26, 2019
Acceptance Date
September 18, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 4 Number: 1