AERODYNAMIC ANALYSES OF NACA 63-215
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Doğru, M. H. 2017. Investigation of Velocity Distribution and Turbulent Energy for the Different Tip Shaped Projectiles. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 32(3), 39-46.
- Göv İ. and Korkmaz Ü., 2016. Comparison of Aerodynamic Performance of NACA 4412 and S809 Airfoil Profile. International Mechanical Engineering and Technologies Conference.
- Göv, I., Dogru, M. H., & Korkmaz, U. 2019. Improvement of the aerodynamic performance of NACA 4412 using the adjustable airfoil profile during the flight. Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 34(2), 1110-1125.
- Holst T. L., 1994. Computational Fluid Dynamics Uses in Fluid Dynamics/Aerodynamics Education. NASA Technical Memorandum 108834.
- Hossain, MD. S., Raiyan, M. F., Akanda, M. N. U., Jony, N. H. (2014). A Comparative Flow Analysis of NACA 6409 and NACA 4412 Airfoil. IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 03, 342-350.
- Kavya G., Reddy B.C.R., 2015. Design and Finite Element Analysis of Aircraft Wing Using Ribs and Spars. International Journal & Magazine of Engineering Technology, Management and Research. 2, 11.
- Kumar B. S. A., Ramalingaiah, Manjunath S., Ganganna R., 2015. Computational Investigation of Flow Separation over Naca 23024 Airfoil at 6 Million Free Stream Reynolds Number. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society 3,6.
- Patel K.S., Patel S. B., Patel U. B., Ahuja A. P., 2014. CFD Analysis of an Aerofoil. International Journal of Engineering Research 3,3.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ümit Korkmaz
This is me
0000-0001-6839-1587
Türkiye
İbrahim Göv
*
0000-0002-5513-0158
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 16, 2020
Submission Date
September 29, 2020
Acceptance Date
October 14, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 5 Number: 2