Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?

Volume: 3 Number: 2 June 1, 2013
  • Majid Delavari
  • Nadiya Gandali Alikhani
  • Esmaeil Naderi
EN

Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the capabilities of two generations of models such as those based on dynamic neural network (e.g., Nonlinear Neural network Auto Regressive or NNAR model) and a regressive (Auto Regressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average model which is based on Fractional Integration Approach) in forecasting daily data related to the return index of Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). In order to compare these models under similar conditions, Mean Square Error (MSE) and also Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were selected as criteria for the models’ simulated out-of-sample forecasting performance. Besides, fractal markets hypothesis was examined and according to the findings, fractal structure was confirmed to exist in the time series under investigation. Another finding of the study was that dynamic artificial neural network model had the best performance in out-of-sample forecasting based on the criteria introduced for calculating forecasting error in comparison with the ARFIMA model.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Majid Delavari This is me

Nadiya Gandali Alikhani This is me

Esmaeil Naderi This is me

Publication Date

June 1, 2013

Submission Date

June 1, 2013

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Delavari, M., Alikhani, N. G., & Naderi, E. (2013). Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 466-475. https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM
AMA
1.Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting? IJEFI. 2013;3(2):466-475. https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM
Chicago
Delavari, Majid, Nadiya Gandali Alikhani, and Esmaeil Naderi. 2013. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3 (2): 466-75. https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM.
EndNote
Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E (June 1, 2013) Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting? International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3 2 466–475.
IEEE
[1]M. Delavari, N. G. Alikhani, and E. Naderi, “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”, IJEFI, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 466–475, June 2013, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM
ISNAD
Delavari, Majid - Alikhani, Nadiya Gandali - Naderi, Esmaeil. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3/2 (June 1, 2013): 466-475. https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM.
JAMA
1.Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting? IJEFI. 2013;3:466–475.
MLA
Delavari, Majid, et al. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2013, pp. 466-75, https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM.
Vancouver
1.Majid Delavari, Nadiya Gandali Alikhani, Esmaeil Naderi. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting? IJEFI [Internet]. 2013 Jun. 1;3(2):466-75. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA69MJ58DM