BibTex RIS Cite

Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 466 - 475, 01.06.2013

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the capabilities of two generations of models such as those based on dynamic neural network (e.g., Nonlinear Neural network Auto Regressive or NNAR model) and a regressive (Auto Regressive Fractionally Integrated Moving Average model which is based on Fractional Integration Approach) in forecasting daily data related to the return index of Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). In order to compare these models under similar conditions, Mean Square Error (MSE) and also Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) were selected as criteria for the models’ simulated out-of-sample forecasting performance. Besides, fractal markets hypothesis was examined and according to the findings, fractal structure was confirmed to exist in the time series under investigation. Another finding of the study was that dynamic artificial neural network model had the best performance in out-of-sample forecasting based on the criteria introduced for calculating forecasting error in comparison with the ARFIMA model.

Year 2013, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 466 - 475, 01.06.2013

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA49DY44YZ
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Majid Delavari This is me

Nadiya Gandali Alikhani This is me

Esmaeil Naderi This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Delavari, M., Alikhani, N. G., & Naderi, E. (2013). Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 466-475.
AMA Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. IJEFI. June 2013;3(2):466-475.
Chicago Delavari, Majid, Nadiya Gandali Alikhani, and Esmaeil Naderi. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3, no. 2 (June 2013): 466-75.
EndNote Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E (June 1, 2013) Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3 2 466–475.
IEEE M. Delavari, N. G. Alikhani, and E. Naderi, “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”, IJEFI, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 466–475, 2013.
ISNAD Delavari, Majid et al. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3/2 (June 2013), 466-475.
JAMA Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. IJEFI. 2013;3:466–475.
MLA Delavari, Majid et al. “Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 3, no. 2, 2013, pp. 466-75.
Vancouver Delavari M, Alikhani NG, Naderi E. Do Dynamic Neural Networks Stand a Better Chance in Fractionally Integrated Process Forecasting?. IJEFI. 2013;3(2):466-75.