BibTex RIS Cite

How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 651 - 656, 01.09.2014

Abstract

Given the rapid growth of financial markets over the past 20 years, along with the explosive development of financial derivatives, an ever-growing need for accurate and efficient volatility forecasting has emerged. Such forecasts have numerous financial applications, such as value-at-risk, hedge ratio, option price and portfolio selection. Recently, the broad availability of intraday trading data has inspired practitioners to investigate their information content in modeling and forecasting the volatility of financial markets. This study aims to propose the introduction of various volatility estimators (overnight volatility (Brooks et al., 2000), PK (Parkinson, 1980), GK (Garman and Klass, 1980), RS (Rogers and Satchell, 1991), RV (Andersen and Bollerslev, 1998), RBP (Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard, 2004), and VIX) into the conditional variance of GARCH(1,1) model to explore the information value of those estimators for improving out-of-sample volatility forecasts of Nasdaq-100 stock index returns at daily horizon over the period from 2005 to 2013. Empirical results indicate that the inclusion of each volatility estimator considered in this research shows an improvement in the GARCH model with certain degree, except for the overnight volatility (ONV) estimator. In addition, daily ranges (PK, GK, RS) and realized volatilities (RV, RBP) are far more informative than the volatility index (VIX).

Year 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 651 - 656, 01.09.2014

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA45JB86VN
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Jying-Nan Wang This is me

Yuan-Teng Hsu This is me

Hung-Chun Liu This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 4 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Wang, J.-N., Hsu, Y.-T., & Liu, H.-C. (2014). How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(3), 651-656.
AMA Wang JN, Hsu YT, Liu HC. How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index. IJEFI. September 2014;4(3):651-656.
Chicago Wang, Jying-Nan, Yuan-Teng Hsu, and Hung-Chun Liu. “How Useful Are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-Based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 4, no. 3 (September 2014): 651-56.
EndNote Wang J-N, Hsu Y-T, Liu H-C (September 1, 2014) How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 4 3 651–656.
IEEE J.-N. Wang, Y.-T. Hsu, and H.-C. Liu, “How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index”, IJEFI, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 651–656, 2014.
ISNAD Wang, Jying-Nan et al. “How Useful Are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-Based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 4/3 (September 2014), 651-656.
JAMA Wang J-N, Hsu Y-T, Liu H-C. How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index. IJEFI. 2014;4:651–656.
MLA Wang, Jying-Nan et al. “How Useful Are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-Based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 4, no. 3, 2014, pp. 651-6.
Vancouver Wang J-N, Hsu Y-T, Liu H-C. How useful are the Various Volatility Estimators for Improving GARCH-based Volatility Forecasts? Evidence from the Nasdaq-100 Stock Index. IJEFI. 2014;4(3):651-6.