BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 1321 - 1327, 01.09.2016

Abstract

Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks

Year 2016, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 1321 - 1327, 01.09.2016

Abstract

The fundamental function of banking remains unchanged throughout the the history of banking theory. The management of risk, asset and liability remain the core function of banking. The early signal of banking crisis can be observed from the volatility of liquidity risk. Hence, this study attempted to investigate the influence of external and internal factors affecting liquidity risk of Islamic and conventional banks. This study employs time series regression analysis of Islamic banks and conventional banks from 2000 to 2010. The study found that Islamic banks maintain higher liquidity compared to conventional banks. The multivariate regression analysis shows that four out of fourteen bank-specific factors and one macroeconomic factor significantly influence the liquidity risk of Islamic bank whereas conventional banks show that Five out of thirteen bank-specific factors are significant to liquidity risk.

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA78CS33CC
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Waeibrorheem Waemustafa This is me

Suriani Sukri This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 6 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Waemustafa, W., & Sukri, S. (2016). Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1321-1327.
AMA Waemustafa W, Sukri S. Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. IJEFI. September 2016;6(4):1321-1327.
Chicago Waemustafa, Waeibrorheem, and Suriani Sukri. “Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6, no. 4 (September 2016): 1321-27.
EndNote Waemustafa W, Sukri S (September 1, 2016) Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6 4 1321–1327.
IEEE W. Waemustafa and S. Sukri, “Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks”, IJEFI, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1321–1327, 2016.
ISNAD Waemustafa, Waeibrorheem - Sukri, Suriani. “Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 6/4 (September 2016), 1321-1327.
JAMA Waemustafa W, Sukri S. Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. IJEFI. 2016;6:1321–1327.
MLA Waemustafa, Waeibrorheem and Suriani Sukri. “Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 6, no. 4, 2016, pp. 1321-7.
Vancouver Waemustafa W, Sukri S. Systematic and Unsystematic Risk Determinants of Liquidity Risk Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. IJEFI. 2016;6(4):1321-7.