ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NAMIBIA: EVIDENCE FROM ANNUAL DATA

Abstract

The driving objective of the study was to measure in quantitative terms the influence of foreign direct investment on economic growth through cointegration techniques. Namibia was used as a case study. Annual dataset stretching from 1990 to 2014 was also applied. The imperative findings arising from the study constitutes the following: The study found long-run relationships among all the variables under consideration in the econometric model. The estimated long-run equation also indicates a positive association between the explanatory variables and real gross domestic product. In particular, net foreign direct capital was found to have a stronger influence on economic growth compared to openness and real foreign exchange rate. Correspondingly, a unidirectional relationship running from real exchange rate to net foreign direct investments was found. In addition, amongst the three explanatory variables used in the model, openness and net foreign direct investment contributed more towards innovations in economic growth during the forecast horizon compared to real exchange rate variable. The research paper concludes by creating opportunities for further investigations

Keywords

• Co-integration, economic growth, innovation

References

1. Agrawal, G., and Khan, A. M (2011), “Impact of FDI on GDP Growth: A Panel
2. Data Study. European Journal of Scientific Research”, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 257- Ayanwale, Adeolu (2007), “FDI and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria”.
3. AERC Research, Paper 165. African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi. Bank of Namibia (2006), “The assessment of foreign direct investment versus domestic investment in Namibia”, Annual symposium report, No. 8, pp. 9-10.
4. Biswas, Romita (2002), “Determinants of foreign direct investment”, Review of
5. Development Economics, Vol. 6. No. 3, pp. 500-502. Blonigen, B. and Wang, M (2005), “Inappropriate Pooling of Wealthy and Poor
6. Countries in Empirical FDI Studies”, In Moran, T.H., Graham, E., & Blomstrom, M. (Eds.). Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Institute of International Economics Press, Washington, D. C. Chaitanya V, K. and Tamazian, A (2010), “Growth effects of foreign direct investment and economic policy reforms in Latin America”, MPRA Paper, No.
7. Emin, E. M (2011), “Growth, Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Inflation: An
8. Empirical Application on Turkey”. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, Euro Journals, Vol. 9, pp. 137-147. Farkas, B (2012), “Absorptive Capacities and Impact of FDI on Economic

9. Growth”, DIW Berlin German Institute for Economic Research, March, pp. 1-20. Government of Namibia (2012), Annual economic development report. John
10. Meinert Printing. Windhoek, pp. 87-131. Iamsiraroj, S. and Doucouliagos, H (2015), “Does Growth Attract
11. FDI?” http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles.pdf/2015-19
12. Date of access: 19 March 2016, pp. 1-5.
13. Karimi, M. S., and Zulkornain, Y (2009), “FDI and Economic Growth in
14. Malaysia”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive MPRA Paper No. 14999.
15. Li, X. and Liu, X (2005), “Foreign direct investment and economic growth: An increasingly endogenous relationship”, World Development, Vol. 33, No 3, pp. 407.
16. Ray, S (2012), “Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in
17. India: A Cointegration Analysis”, World Science Publisher, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 201. Ruxanda, G. and Muraru, A (2010), “FDI and economic growth: Evidence from simultaneous equation models”, Romanian J. Econ. Forecasting, Vol. 1, pp. 45
18. Vu, T.B. and Noy, I (2009), “Sectoral analysis of foreign direct investment and growth in the developed countries”, Journal of International Financial Markets
19. Institutions Money, Vol. 19, pp. 402-413.