DO INFORMAL METHODS TO CONTROL POLLUTION WORK? A CASE OF INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION IN PAKISTAN.

Abstract

The formal environmental pollution control and regulatory system in Pakistan has failed to achieve the policy objectives and targets to control growing pollution levels in Pakistan. The ineffectiveness of the regulatory system underscores the need to explore the potential use of informal approaches to control industrial pollution. The focus group discussion with the stakeholders in the Korangi industrial area revolve around a broad theme of environmental supply and environmental demand indicators that form the basis for exploring the potential use of informal regulations to complement a regulatory system, alongside community activism.

Keywords

• Regulatory framework, Informal approaches, Community activism

References

1. Afsah, Shakeb, Benoit Laplante, David Wheeler (1996), “Controlling Industrial
2. Pollution: A New Paradigm Policy” World Bank Policy Research Paper 1672.
3. Washington D.C.: World Bank. Birdsall, Nancy, & David Wheeler (1993), “Trade policy and industrial pollution in
4. Latin America: Where are the pollution havens?”Journal of Environment and Development, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 137–149. Dasgupta, Susmita, David Wheeler, (1997), Citizen Complaints as Environmental
5. Indicators: Evidence from China, World Bank Working Paper 1704, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
6. Hartman, R., Mainul Huq and David Wheeler (1995) “Why Paper Mills Clean-up:
7. Results from a four-country survey in Asia”, Policy Research Department Working Paper, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, DC. Hettige, Mala and David Witzel, (1996), “Pollution Control Priorities for
8. Mexico”, World Bank,Policy Research Department (mimeo). Huq, Mainul and David Wheeler (1993), Pollution reduction without formal regulation: Evidence from Bangladesh. In: Environment Department Working

9. Paper, No. 1993-39, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
10. Mookherjee, Dilip & Png, I P L, (1992), "Monitoring vis-a-vis Investigation in
11. Enforcement of Law," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, Vol. 82, No.3, pp 556-65. Mookherjee, Dilip & Png, I P L (1995), "Corruptible Law Enforcers: How Should
12. They Be Compensated?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Vol.105, No 428, pp 145-59. Murty, Narasimha. and Ramana Prasad (1999), “Emissions Reduction and Influence of Local Communities in India”, in M.N. Murty, A.J. James and Smita
13. Misra (eds.), Economics of Industrial Pollution Abatement: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Indian Experience, Delhi: Oxford University Press Pargal, Sheoli and David Wheeler, (1995), Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. In: Policy Research
14. Department Working Paper, No. 1416, Washington D.C.: World Bank.
15. Pargal, Sheoli and David Wheeler, (1996), "Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104 No.6, pp.1314-27.
16. Pargal, Sheoli., Mala Hettige, Manjula Singh, and David Wheeler (1997b),
17. “Formal and Informal Regulation of Industrial Pollution: Comparative Evidence from Indonesia and the United States”, World Bank Economic Review, Vol.11 No.5, pp. 433-50. David Wheeler, et al. (2000), Greening Industry: New Roles for Communities,
18. SRO required all production units to immediately comply with the new standards after July 1994. Under the PEPA, , NEQS were revised with full consultation with the private sector, industrialists, trade and business associations and NGOs. The municipal and liquid industrial effluent standards cover 32 parameters. The standards for industrial gaseous emissions specify limits for 16 parameters and the standards for motor vehicles prescribe maximum permissible limits for smoke, carbon monoxide and noise.
19. Revised standards cover discharge limits of effluents into inland water, sewage treatment plants (operational) and the sea. SMRS was introduced in 1998 which takes into account the resources and interests of both the regulators and industries.
20. Table B: Socio-economic and environmental characteristics of KIA Korangi Industrial Area (KIA) Established in mid sixties, the KIA became operational in 1970. It is situated in the southeast of Karachi and spreads over 3,500 hectares. About 3,000 industrial and commercial units are currently in operation in the Karachi Industrial and Trading Estates (KITE)
21. (US$ 27 million) a day. Total gross exports for 8 from KIA amount to approx US65 million 4. Data obtained from the members of Korangi Association of Trade and Industry 2007
22. Korangi Association of Trade and Industry 2007
23. Table C: Category wise industries operating in KIA S.No Textile and Allied Leather and Allied Engineering works Food, Tobacco and Beverages Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals Plastic products Ice factories Paper products Chicken feed factories Wood and Allied Petrochemicals Rubber products Power plants Others Total Units Source: Korangi Association of Trade and Industry 2007 Appendix 4