BibTex RIS Cite

COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 63 - 70, 01.06.2010

Abstract

Turkey has created some opportunities for the organisations in the defense industry to generate a
suitable business and to ensure its sustainability. The domestic coverage ratio of defense system
need in 2010 is aimed as 50%. To achieve this target depends on the defense industry
competitiveness. In this study, the development plans, strategies and foreign trade are examined.
Its contribution which has an important place in the research and development investment, is not
at the level expected in Turkey’s economy. Turkey occupies 47th position in World Competitiveness
Scoreboard, and 61st position in Global Competitiveness Index in 2009. The index factors are
investigated to understand the competitiveness according to the Porter’s diamond model, applied
in Turkey for the first time. As a result, the competitiveness analysis of Turkish defense industry is
carried out and its global place and competitive advantage are exposed. Therefore, a framework is
made to introduce a guide for decision-making by using a widely-accepted model, and to
contribute to the plans and strategies.

References

  • CMMI (2010), Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Published Appraisal Results, http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/pars.aspx, [Accessed 17.05.2010]
  • CORDIS (2010), CORDIS – Partners DB, http://cordis.europa.eu/partners-service/search_en.html, Accessed 25.05.2010]
  • DPT (2006), The Ninth Development Plan 2007-2013, DPT, Ankara.
  • GCR (2009), Klaus Schwab, The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010, the World
  • Economic Forum, Switzerland. Grant, Robert M. (1991), “Porter’s ‘Competitive Advantage of Nations’: An Assessment”,
  • Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp.535-548. NAMSA (2010), Procurement, http://www.namsa.nato.int/suppliers/suppliers_e.htm, [Accessed 05.2010]
  • PIGM (2010), İstatistikler – Piyasa Faaliyetleri, Petrol İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü http://www.pigm.gov.tr/istatistikler.php, [Accessed 22.05.2010]
  • Porter, Michael E. (1998), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, NewYork,
  • SIPRI (2009), SIPRI Yearbook 2009 Armaments, Disarmament and International Security
  • Summary, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. SIPRI DB (2010), SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, http://milexdata.sipri.org/, [Accessed 05.2010]
  • SSM (2010), Turkish Defense Industry, http://www.ssm.gov.tr/home/Sayfalar/default.aspx, Accessed 17.05.2010]
  • TOBB (2009), Türkiye Savunma Sanayi Sektör Raporu, Ankara.
  • TUIK (2007), Electricity Generation and Distribution, 2006 IV. Quarter (October-November- December), TUIK, Press Release - No:44, March, 2007.
  • TUIK DB (2010), Veritabanları – Eğitim, Kültür, Spor, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/jsp/duyuru/upload/vt/vt.htm, [Accessed 22.05.2010]
  • WCR (2009), The IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2009.
Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 63 - 70, 01.06.2010

Abstract

References

  • CMMI (2010), Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon, Published Appraisal Results, http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/pars.aspx, [Accessed 17.05.2010]
  • CORDIS (2010), CORDIS – Partners DB, http://cordis.europa.eu/partners-service/search_en.html, Accessed 25.05.2010]
  • DPT (2006), The Ninth Development Plan 2007-2013, DPT, Ankara.
  • GCR (2009), Klaus Schwab, The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010, the World
  • Economic Forum, Switzerland. Grant, Robert M. (1991), “Porter’s ‘Competitive Advantage of Nations’: An Assessment”,
  • Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp.535-548. NAMSA (2010), Procurement, http://www.namsa.nato.int/suppliers/suppliers_e.htm, [Accessed 05.2010]
  • PIGM (2010), İstatistikler – Piyasa Faaliyetleri, Petrol İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü http://www.pigm.gov.tr/istatistikler.php, [Accessed 22.05.2010]
  • Porter, Michael E. (1998), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, NewYork,
  • SIPRI (2009), SIPRI Yearbook 2009 Armaments, Disarmament and International Security
  • Summary, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. SIPRI DB (2010), SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, http://milexdata.sipri.org/, [Accessed 05.2010]
  • SSM (2010), Turkish Defense Industry, http://www.ssm.gov.tr/home/Sayfalar/default.aspx, Accessed 17.05.2010]
  • TOBB (2009), Türkiye Savunma Sanayi Sektör Raporu, Ankara.
  • TUIK (2007), Electricity Generation and Distribution, 2006 IV. Quarter (October-November- December), TUIK, Press Release - No:44, March, 2007.
  • TUIK DB (2010), Veritabanları – Eğitim, Kültür, Spor, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/jsp/duyuru/upload/vt/vt.htm, [Accessed 22.05.2010]
  • WCR (2009), The IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2009.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA92ZF26UG
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hakki Bılgen This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bılgen, H. (2010). COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 2(1), 63-70.
AMA Bılgen H. COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. IJEFS. June 2010;2(1):63-70.
Chicago Bılgen, Hakki. “COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 2, no. 1 (June 2010): 63-70.
EndNote Bılgen H (June 1, 2010) COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 2 1 63–70.
IEEE H. Bılgen, “COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”, IJEFS, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2010.
ISNAD Bılgen, Hakki. “COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 2/1 (June 2010), 63-70.
JAMA Bılgen H. COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. IJEFS. 2010;2:63–70.
MLA Bılgen, Hakki. “COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2010, pp. 63-70.
Vancouver Bılgen H. COMPETITIVENESS OF DEFENSE INDUSTRY IN TURKEY. IJEFS. 2010;2(1):63-70.