BibTex RIS Cite

QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA

Year 2012, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 149 - 158, 01.06.2012

Abstract

The services sector in Malaysia is slowly liberalising in terms of equity
ownership. However, trade and investment barriers in the services sector are
difficult to measure since it is not easily quantifiable. Previous studies were
mainly macro-level, multi-country cross-sectional assessments while there are no
country level studies over time. This paper has two objectives. The first is to
measure barriers to trade in services carried out through commercial presence
(Mode 3) in Malaysia in several industries over time. The second objective is to
assess the policy implications of the measurement obtained. Based on available
data, the industries covered in this study include communications, construction,
distribution, higher education, financial, healthcare, tourism and transportation
and logistics services from 2001-2010. This assessment is important as Malaysia
hopes to attract more foreign direct investment (FDI) into its services sector.
Information is gathered through surveys, focus group discussions and content
analysis of secondary sources. Restrictive policies on FDI are transformed into an
index to measure the extent of liberalisation for each subsector. Based on the
index, it can be seen that the liberalisation process is still slow. To facilitate
further progress in liberalising the services sector, it is important to liberalise
barriers beyond mere equity ownership

References

  • Cavana, Robert, Brian Delahaye and Uma Sekaran (2001), Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dee, Philippa and Dinh, Huong (2009), “Barriers to Trade in Health and Financial Services in ASEAN”, ERIA Discussion Paper Series ERIA-DP-2009-11, Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
  • Dee, Philippa (2005), "A Compendium of Barriers to Services Trade", Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  • Dee, Philippa, Kevin Hanslow and Tien Phamduc (2003), "Measuring the Cost of Barriers to Trade in Services", (in: Ito, Takatoshi and Anne Krueger, Ed. Trade in Services in the Asia Pacific Region), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11-46. Dunning, John (2001), The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, International Journal of the Economics of Business 8 (2), London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 173-190.
  • Dunning, John and Sarianna Lundan (2008), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, 2nd Edition, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Golub, Stephen (2003), Measures of Restrictions on Inward Foreign Direct Investment for OECD Countries, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Golub, Stephen and Takeshi Koyama (2006), “OECD's FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index: Revision and Extension to More Economies”, Working Papers on International Investment 2006/4, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Hardin, Alexis and Leanne Holmes (1997), “Service Trade and Foreign Direct Investment”, Australian Productivity Commission Working Paper, Canberra: Productivity Commission.
  • Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (1993), Industrialising Malaysia: Policy, Performance, Prospects, London: Routledge.
  • Malaysia (2011), Companies Act 1965 (Act 125), Petaling Jaya: International Law Book Services.
  • Malaysia (2011), Tenth Malaysia Plan 20011-2015, Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department.
  • McGuire, Greg (2002), “Trade in Services – Market Access Opportunities and the Benefits of Liberalization for Developing Economies”, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 19, New York: The United Nations.
  • Ochiai, Ryo (2006), "An Investigation into the Measures Affecting the Integration of ASEAN’s Priority Sectors (Phase 2): Overview: Impediments to Trade in the Priority Services Sector", REPSF Project 06/001a: Final Report, Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
  • UNCTAD (2006), “Measuring Restrictions on FDI in Services in Developing Countries and Transition Economies”, UNCTAD Current Studies on FDI and Development, Geneva: The United Nations.
  • WTO, (1994), General Agreement on Trade in Services and Related Instruments, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • WTO, (2001), Trade Policy Review Malaysia 1996-2000, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • WTO, (2005), Trade Policy Review Malaysia 2001-2005, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • WTO, (2010), Trade Policy Review Malaysia 2006-2010. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
Year 2012, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 149 - 158, 01.06.2012

Abstract

References

  • Cavana, Robert, Brian Delahaye and Uma Sekaran (2001), Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dee, Philippa and Dinh, Huong (2009), “Barriers to Trade in Health and Financial Services in ASEAN”, ERIA Discussion Paper Series ERIA-DP-2009-11, Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
  • Dee, Philippa (2005), "A Compendium of Barriers to Services Trade", Washington D.C.: World Bank.
  • Dee, Philippa, Kevin Hanslow and Tien Phamduc (2003), "Measuring the Cost of Barriers to Trade in Services", (in: Ito, Takatoshi and Anne Krueger, Ed. Trade in Services in the Asia Pacific Region), Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11-46. Dunning, John (2001), The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future, International Journal of the Economics of Business 8 (2), London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 173-190.
  • Dunning, John and Sarianna Lundan (2008), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, 2nd Edition, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Golub, Stephen (2003), Measures of Restrictions on Inward Foreign Direct Investment for OECD Countries, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Golub, Stephen and Takeshi Koyama (2006), “OECD's FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index: Revision and Extension to More Economies”, Working Papers on International Investment 2006/4, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Hardin, Alexis and Leanne Holmes (1997), “Service Trade and Foreign Direct Investment”, Australian Productivity Commission Working Paper, Canberra: Productivity Commission.
  • Jomo, Kwame Sundaram (1993), Industrialising Malaysia: Policy, Performance, Prospects, London: Routledge.
  • Malaysia (2011), Companies Act 1965 (Act 125), Petaling Jaya: International Law Book Services.
  • Malaysia (2011), Tenth Malaysia Plan 20011-2015, Putrajaya: Prime Minister’s Department.
  • McGuire, Greg (2002), “Trade in Services – Market Access Opportunities and the Benefits of Liberalization for Developing Economies”, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 19, New York: The United Nations.
  • Ochiai, Ryo (2006), "An Investigation into the Measures Affecting the Integration of ASEAN’s Priority Sectors (Phase 2): Overview: Impediments to Trade in the Priority Services Sector", REPSF Project 06/001a: Final Report, Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
  • UNCTAD (2006), “Measuring Restrictions on FDI in Services in Developing Countries and Transition Economies”, UNCTAD Current Studies on FDI and Development, Geneva: The United Nations.
  • WTO, (1994), General Agreement on Trade in Services and Related Instruments, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • WTO, (2001), Trade Policy Review Malaysia 1996-2000, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • WTO, (2005), Trade Policy Review Malaysia 2001-2005, Geneva: World Trade Organization.
  • WTO, (2010), Trade Policy Review Malaysia 2006-2010. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA59NV34DJ
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Nirwan Noh This is me

Tham Siew Yean This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Noh, N., & Yean, T. S. (2012). QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 4(1), 149-158.
AMA Noh N, Yean TS. QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA. IJEFS. June 2012;4(1):149-158.
Chicago Noh, Nirwan, and Tham Siew Yean. “QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 4, no. 1 (June 2012): 149-58.
EndNote Noh N, Yean TS (June 1, 2012) QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 4 1 149–158.
IEEE N. Noh and T. S. Yean, “QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA”, IJEFS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 149–158, 2012.
ISNAD Noh, Nirwan - Yean, Tham Siew. “QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 4/1 (June 2012), 149-158.
JAMA Noh N, Yean TS. QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA. IJEFS. 2012;4:149–158.
MLA Noh, Nirwan and Tham Siew Yean. “QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA”. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012, pp. 149-58.
Vancouver Noh N, Yean TS. QUANTIFYING BARRIERS TO TRADE IN SERVICES THROUGH COMMERCIAL PRESENCE: SELECTED SERVICES IN MALAYSIA. IJEFS. 2012;4(1):149-58.