The transformation from e-government to e-land administration in Türkiye: A SWOT-based assessment analysis

Year 2023, , 290 - 300, 15.10.2023

Derya Nur Bolat Pak Osman Sami Kırtıloğlu Mert Kayalık , Zeynel Abidin Polat

https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1152715

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The advantage of the developing information and communication technology in terms of both time and cost in service delivery has accelerated the use of these technologies in public administration. With this change, the concept of e-government has taken its place in the literature and has begun to be used in different fields (such as health, safety, tax, education) in many countries. Land management is one of these areas. The Land Registry and Cadastre Directorate and many other public institutions have started to provide many services through e-government within the scope of land management. Thus, the foundations of the transition to e-land administration began to be laid. This study aims to determine the necessary strategies for transition to e-land administration considering the role of the e-government platform in the provision of public services relating to land management in Turkey. Therefore, the current e-service structure related pertaining to land management has been analyzed with the SWOT technique. Thus, the strengths and weaknesses of the existing structure system were revealed. Besides, the opportunities and threats faced by this structure were identified. As a result of the analysis, various suggestions were made for the institutional policies that should be implemented in the transition to e-land administration.

Keywords

e-government, e-land administration, public manegement, SWOT analysis

References

• Şahin, A., & Örselli, E. (2003). E-Devlet anlayışı sürecinde Türkiye. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (9), 343-356.
• Öğüt, A. (2003). Bilgi Çağında Yönetim. Nobel Basımevi, Ankara.
• İşcan, F., & Ilgaz, A. (2017). Analysis of geographic/urban information system web presentations of local governments in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(3), 75-83.
• Ercan, O., & Toker, K. (2022). Assessment of the completion of the forest cadastre considering the legal grounds, collaboration, and the use of technology: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(1), 49-58.
• Roy, J. (2006). E-Governmnet in Canada: Transformation İfor Digital Age. Ottawa University: Ottawa Press.
• İşcan, F., & Vargeloğlu, F. (2019). Boru hattı kamulaştırma çalışmalarında karşılaşılan teknik, ekonomik, hukuki sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Geomatik, 4(3), 239-253.
• Yıldırır, H., & Karakurt, E. (2004). e-Devlet ve Uygulamaları. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 6(1).
• Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e‐government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality?. Public administration review, 62(4), 424-433.
• Başar, M. S., & Bölükbaş, A. (2010). Gelişmişlik göstergeleri ve e-devlet indeksi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 157-170.
• Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, S., Dridi, F., & Pernul, G. (2003). Security requirements for e-government services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy. Computer communications, 26(16), 1873-1883.
• Van der Molen, P., & Wubbe, M. (2007, November). E-government and E-Land Administration-As an example: The Netherlands. In 6th FIG Regional Conference, San Jose, Costa Rica (pp. 12-15).
• Marquardt, K., & Orhan, G. (2005). E-Devlet: Gerçek ya da Hayal içinde: E-Devlet: Kavramın Anlamı ve Kapsamı, (Editörler: Karl Marquardt ve Orhan Gökçe), Çizgi Kitapevi Yayınları, Konya, 1-25.
• Uğur, A. A., & Çütcü, İ. (2009). E-Devlet ve tasarruf etkisi kapsamında VEDOP Projesi. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 1-20.
• Uçkan, Ö. (2003). E-devlet, e-demokrasi ve e-yönetişim modeli: Bir ilkesel öncelik olarak bilgiye erişim özgürlüğü. Aylık Strateji ve Analiz E-Dergisi, 5(5), 1-19.
• Zakout, W., Wehrmann, B., & Törhönen, M., P. (2006). Good governance in land administration, The World Bank, FAO, Washington DC.
• Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University.
• Döner, F. (2021). Analysis of literature on 3D cadastre. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(2), 90-97.
• Dale, P. F., & McLaughlin, J. D. (1999). Land administration. sl New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2005). Toward e-land administration: Australian online land information services. In Proceedings of the SSC.
• Williamson, I., & Ting, L. (2001). Land administration and cadastral trends—a framework for re-engineering. Computers, environment and urban systems, 25(4-5), 339-366.
• Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2005). The role cadastral data modelling in e-Land administration. Coordinates, 1(4), 26-29.
• Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2006). An interoperability toolkit for e-Land administration. Sustainability and Land Administration Systems, Department of Geomatics, Melbourne, 213-222.
• Cho, B., & Yoo, J. (2015). Development of a unified land information system in the republic of korea. How Innovations in Land Administration Reform Improve on Doing Business: Cases for Luthuania, the Republich of Korea, Rwanda and the United Kingdom (Editors: Hilhorst, T., & Meunier, F.) Washington DC: The World Bank.
• Çarıkçı, O. (2010). Türkiyede e-devlet uygulamalari üzerine bir araştirma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (12), 95-122.
• Seferoğlu, S., Çelen, F., & Çelik, A. (2011). Türkiye’deki e-devlet uygulamaları: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri üzerine bir inceleme, Türkiye’de E-Öğrenme: Gelişmeler ve Uygulamalar II, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
• Güler, D., & Yomralıoğlu, T. (2021). Yapı Ruhsatlandırmadan Kat Mülkiyetine Giden Süreçlerin Dijitalleştirilmesi: Mevcut Durum Analizi ve Öneri. Geomatik, 6(2), 93-106.
• DPT, (2005), Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı, E-Devlet Proje Ve Uygulamaları.
• Demirhan, Y., & Türkoğlu, İ. (2014). Türkiye’de E-devlet uygulamalarının bazı yönetim süreçlerine etkisinin örnek projeler bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 10(22), 235-256.
• Akgül, E., A. (2015), E-devlet ve yurttaşlık ilişkisi üzerine sosyolojik bir değerlendime: Aydın ili örneği, Doktora Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
• Akça, H. (2005). Burdur ilinin kırsal turizm potansiyeli ve değerlendirilmesi. Burdur Sempozyumu, 16, 19.
• İnayet, Z., & Akbulak, C. (2010). Troia Tarihi Milli Parkı’ndaki turizm potansiyelinin SWOT analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. 11. Ulusal Turizm Kongresi, 2(5), 203-213.
• Ongun, U., Gövdere, B., & Çiçek, U. (2016). Yeşilova’nın kırsal turizm potansiyelinin Swot analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 7(16), 75-88.
• Taktak, F., & Mehmet, I. L. I. (2018). Güneş Enerji Santrali (GES) Geliştirme: Uşak Örneği. Geomatik, 3(1), 1-21.
• Kahraman, C., Demirel, N. Ç., & Demirel, T. (2007). Prioritization of e-government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Turkey. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 284-298.
• Kahraman, C., Demirel, N. Ç., Demirel, T., & Ateş, N. Y. (2008). A SWOT-AHP application using fuzzy concept: e-government in Turkey. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: theory and applications with recent developments, 85-117.
• Alshomrani, S., & Qamar, S. (2012). Hybrid SWOT-AHP analysis of Saudi Arabia E-government. International journal of computer applications, 48(2), 1-7.
• Avny, A. (2007). SWOT analysis of e-government. Universitatii Bucuresti. Analele. Seria Stiinte Economice si Administrative, 1, 43-54
• Damian, I. P. M., Segundo, J. S., & Merlo, E. M. (2014). SWOT analysis of the services provided by e-government sites in Brazil. Procedia Computer Science, 33, 130-135.
• Al Salmi, M. A. A., & Hasnan, N. B. (2015). SWOT and TOWS matrix e-government analysis review on Sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Learning and Development, 5(4), 13-23.
• Elsheikh, Y., & Azzeh, M. (2017). Prioritize E-government Strategies Using SWOT-Ranked Voting Analysis Technique: The Case of Jordan. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security (IJCSNS), 17(1), 1-7
• Rachid, G., & El Fadel, M. (2013). Comparative SWOT analysis of strategic environmental assessment systems in the Middle East and North Africa region. Journal of environmental management, 125, 85-93.
• Polat, Z. A., Alkan, M., & Sürmeneli, H. G. (2017). Determining strategies for the cadastre 2034 vision using an AHP-Based SWOT analysis: A case study for the turkish cadastral and land administration system. Land use policy, 67, 151-166.
• Yan, J., Xia, F., & Bao, H. X. (2015). Strategic planning framework for land consolidation in China: A top-level design based on SWOT analysis. Habitat International, 48, 46-54.
• Halla, F. (2007). A SWOT analysis of strategic urban development planning: The case of Dar es Salaam city in Tanzania. Habitat international, 31(1), 130-142.
• Steudler, D., & Williamson, I. P. (2005). Evaluation of national land administration system in Switzerland. Survey review, 38(298), 317-330.
• Paudel, G. S., & Thapa, G. B. (2001). Local Organizational Capability for Land Management: A SWOT Analysis of Organizations in the Hills of Nepal. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development, 11(2), 15-34.
• Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de e-devlet uygulamaları. Bilgi Toplumu ve E-Devlet. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. ISBN: 978-975-06-1958-8, 90-111.
• West, D. M. (2004). E‐government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public administration review, 64(1), 15-27.
• Şişman, A., Alkış, Z., & Maraş, E. E. (2011). E-Devlet ve M-Devlet’in Geliştirilmesinin Önündeki Engel; Sayısal Uçurum. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 3(1), 27-37.
• Akcagündüz, E. (2013). Türkiye’de e-Devlet sistemine farklı bir bakış: e-Devlet ve tasarruf ilişkisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(2), 127-140.
• Ateş, H., & Yavuz, Ö. (2019). Elektronik devletten mobil devlete geçiş: Fırsatlar, tehditler ve uygulama örnekleri. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 14(2), 155-177.