Creation of surface model using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry in cultural heritage areas: The example of Kilistra Ancient City

Abstract

Historic buildings have been damaged by natural events and human hands for centuries. For this reason, the importance of studies on the preservation, documentation and restoration of historical buildings is increasing worldwide. In addition, technological opportunities are also becoming necessary for carrying out more comprehensive studies on the sustainability of historical buildings. Studies on modelling many cultural heritage (CH) works worldwide continue. Precise data about the structure must be obtained to evaluate these models in reconstruction studies. In parallel with technological developments, the measurement sensitivity of devices in this field has also increased. In addition, different technological tools that will assist in measurement activities are entering our lives daily. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems are one of them. 3D data from UAVs and photogrammetric systems are sensitive data obtained quickly and cheaply. This data provides the opportunity to be used in interdisciplinary studies. This study investigates the use of UAVs in the digital documentation study of the Ancient City of Kilistra in Konya/Gökyurt. The study showed that UAVs are more practical and effective than traditional measurement techniques. It has been revealed that, if appropriate conditions are provided, UAVs can be a suitable alternative in terms of time and cost in documenting CH sites. Finally, it has been determined that the high-resolution digital maps obtained not only speed up the process of documenting large areas but also provide advantages in accuracy and precision.

Keywords

• Photogrammetry
• Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
• Cultural Heritage
• recreation areas
• documentation

References

1. Yücel Batmaz, N., & Biçici, G. (2021). Türkiye'de somut kültürel mirasın korunması üzerine bir alan araştırması: Kırıkkale Delice örneği. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 4(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.827589
2. Varol, F. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kültürel miras yönetimi: Turizm paydaşlarına yönelik bir araştırma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(4), 1140-1156. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.803393
3. Tunçer, M. (2017). Dünden bugüne kültürel miras ve koruma. Gazi Kitabevi.
4. Mendoza, M.A.D., De La Hoz Franco, E., & Gómez, J.E.G. (2023). Technologies for the preservation of cultural heritage-a systematic review of the literature. Sustainability, 15, 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021059
5. UNESCO (1972). Convention concerning protecting the world's cultural and natural heritage (Adopted by the general conference at its seventeenth session Paris), 16 November 1972. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf
6. T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı (2023). Arkeolojik Mirasın Korunmasına İlişkin Avrupa Sözleşmesi https://teftis.ktb.gov.tr/TR-263663/arkeolojik-mirasin-korunmasina-iliskin-avrupa-sozlesmesi.html
7. Bang Ping Mah, O., Yan, Y., Song Yi Tan, J., Tan, Y., Qi Ying Tay, G., Jian Chiam, D., Wang, Y., Dean, K., & Feng, C. (2019). Generating a virtual tour for the preservation of the (in)tangible cultural heritage of Tampines Chinese Temple in Singapore. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 39, 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.004.
8. Ünal, Z.G. (2014). Kültürel mirasın korunması. İSMEP Rehber Kitaplar Beyaz Gemi Sosyal Proje Ajans Yayınları.

9. Çetin, T. (2010). “Cumalıkızık Köyü’nde Kültürel Miras ve Turizm Algısı”. Milli Folklor Dergisi, 22: 181-190.
10. Çomak, H., & Gökalp Kutlu, A. (2014). Uluslararası Güvenlik Kongresi, Bildiler Kitabı. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Yayınları.
11. Varol, F., Ulvi, A., & Yakar, M. (2018). Kültürel Mirasın Dokümantasyonunda Yersel Fotogrametri Tekniğinin Kullanılması: Sazak Köprüsü Örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(57), 986-991. http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2018.2508
12. Yakar, M., & Doğan, Y. (2017). Mersin Silifke Mezgit Kale Anıt Mezarı fotogrametrik rölöve alımı ve üç boyutlu modelleme çalışması. Geomatik, 2(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.296763
13. Mekonnen, H., Bires, Z., & Berhanu, K. (2022). Practices and challenges of cultural heritage conservation in historical and religious heritage sites: evidence from North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Heritage Science, 10, 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00802-6
14. Yakar, M., & Dogan, Y. (2019). 3D Reconstruction of Residential Areas with SfM Photogrammetry. In Advances in Remote Sensing and Geo Informatics Applications: Proceedings of the 1st Springer Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences (CAJG-1), Tunisia 2018 (pp. 73-75). Springer International Publishing.
15. Bilici, E., Uğur Uzun, Y., & Erdal, C. (2023). Dijital halkla ilişkiler uygulamalarında kültürel miras ögelerinin yeri: Göbeklitepe'nin Türkiye imajına ve itibarına katkısı. A.B. Darı (Edt.), Dijital çağda halkla ilişkiler (ss. 109-128). Paradigma Akademi Yayınları.
16. Koçak, B., & Can, H. (2018). Kültürel mirasın korunmasında belediye birliklerinin rolü: Koca Yusuf Projesi örneği. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14), 148-164.
17. Kuban, D. (2000). Tarihi çevre korumanın mimarlık boyutu. Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.
18. Smith, B.J., Warke, P.A., & Curran, J.M. (2004). Implications of climate change and increased “time-of-wetness” for the soiling and decay of sandstone structures in Belfast, Northern Ireland. R. Prikryl (Edt.). Dimension stone (pp. 9-14). Taylor&Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203024492.ch1
19. Ioannides, M., Chatzigrigoriou, P., Bokolas, V., Nikolakopoulou, V., & Athanasiou, V. (2016). Educational use of 3D models and photogrammetry content: the Europeana space project for Cypriot UNESCO monuments. In Fourth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2016) (Vol. 9688, pp. 284-292), SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2247936
20. Mırdan, O., & Yakar, M. (2017). Tarihi eserlerin insansız hava aracı ile modellenmesinde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Geomatik, 2(3), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.306914
21. Şasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2017). Photogrammetric modelling of Sakahane Masjid using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 1(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.316675
22. Yilmaz, H. M., Yakar, M., Gulec, S. A., & Dulgerler, O. N. (2007). Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 8(4), 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.07.004
23. Rahaman, H., & Champion, E. (2019). To 3D or not 3D: choosing a photogrammetry workflow for cultural heritage groups. Heritage, 2(3), 1835-1851. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2030112
24. Yakar, M., Kabadayı, A., Yiğit, A. Y., Çıkıkcı, K., Kaya, Y., & Catin, S. S. (2016). Emir Saltuk Kümbeti fotogrametrik rölöve çalışması ve 3 boyutlu modellenmesi. Geomatik, 1(1), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.294073
25. Colomina, I., & Molina, P. (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 92, 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013
26. Themistocleous, K. (2020). The use of UAVs for cultural heritage and archaeology. Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes: Best Practices and Perspectives Across Europe and the Middle East, 241-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10979-0_14
27. Yakar, M. (2011). Using close range photogrammetry to measure the position of inaccessible geological features. Experimental Techniques, 35, 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2009.00583.x
28. Koçyiğit, F. U. (2020). Arkeolojik alanlarda insansız hava aracı (iha) kullanarak coğrafi bilgi sistemi (cbs) için veri tabanı oluşturma: Anemurium Antik Kent örneği [Doktora tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi], YÖK Tez Merkezi.
29. Lo Brutto, M., Garraffa, A., & Meli, P. (2014). UAV platforms for cultural heritage survey: first results. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, (p. 227-234), Volume II-5, 2014 ISPRS Technical Commission V. Symposium, 23–25 June, Riva del Garda, Italy.
30. Barba, S., Barbarella, M., Di Benedetto, A., Fiani, M., Gujski, L., & Limongiello, M. (2019). accuracyassessment of 3d photogrammetric modelsfrom an unmannedaerial vehicle. Drones, 3(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3040079
31. Tzvetkov, J. (2020). Spatial modeling of archaeological landscapes with UAV and digital photogrammetry. Aerospace Research in Bulgaria, 32, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.3897/arb.v32.e04
32. Bakirman, T., Bayram, B., Akpinar, B., Karabulut, M. F., Bayrak, O. C., Yigitoglu, A., & Seker, D. Z. (2020). Implementation of ultra-light UAV systems for cultural heritage documentation. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 44, 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.01.006
33. Orihuela, A.; Molina-Fajardo, M.A. (2021). UAV photogrammetry surveying for sustainable conservation: The Case of Mondújar Castle (Granada, Spain). Sustainability, 13, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010024
34. Ünel, F. B., Kuşak, L., Çelik, M., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2020). Kıyı çizgisinin belirlenerek mülkiyet durumunun incelenmesi. Türkiye Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi, 2(1), 33-40.
35. Gasparini, M., Moreno-Escribano, J. C., & Monterroso-Checa, A. (2020). Photogrammetric acquisitions in diverse archaeological contexts using drones: Background of the ager mellariensis project (North of Córdoba-Spain). Drones, 4(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030047
36. Karataş, L.,Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64.
37. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Alyilmaz, C., & Alyilmaz, S. (2017). Using the close range photogrammetry technique in 3-dimensional work: History of obrukhan sample. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 17, 347-355
38. Villi, O. & Yakar, M. (2022). İnsansız hava araçlarının kullanım alanları ve sensör tipleri. Türkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.51534/tiha.1189263
39. Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64
40. Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). Cultural heritage modelling using UAV photogrammetric methods: a case study of Kanlıdivane archeological site. Advanced UAV, 1(1), 24-33
41. Kahveci, M., & Can, N. (2017). İnsansız hava araçları: Tarihçesi, tanımı, dünyada ve Türkiye’deki yasal durumu. Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.15317/Scitech.2017.109
42. Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü (2024). Türk sivil havacılık kanunu (1983). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.2920.pdf
43. Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü (2018). İnsansız hava aracı sistemleri talimatı. https://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/mevzuat/sektorel/talimatlar/2020/SHT-IHA_Rev-04.pdf
44. T.C. Anayasa Mahkemesi (2024). T.C. Anayasası (1982). https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.2709.pdf
45. T.C. Adalet Bakanlığı (1981). Kişisel verilerin otomatik işleme tabi tutulması karşısında bireylerin korunması sözleşmesi. https://inhak.adalet.gov.tr/Resimler/Dokuman/2712020140848108_tur.pdf
46. Yakar, M., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y., & Alptekin, A. (2023). Discontinuity set extraction from 3D point clouds obtained by UAV photogrammetry in a rockfall site. Survey Review, 55(392), 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2022.2119747
47. Yiğit, A. Y., & Uysal, M. (2023). Dijital ikiz oluşturmada nokta bulutlarına dayalı analiz. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 318-329. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1200941
48. Şenol, H. İ., Polat, N., Kaya, Y., Memduhoğlu, A., & Ulukavak, M. (2021). Digital documentation of ancient stone carving in Şuayip City. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.899157
49. Şasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2018). Photogrammetric modelling of hasbey dar'ülhuffaz (masjid) using an unmanned aerial vehicle. International journal of engineering and geosciences, 3(1), 6-11.
50. Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., Karataş, L., & Yakar, M. (2022). The use of UAV photogrammetry in modeling ancient structures: A case study of “Kanytellis”. Advanced UAV, 2(2),
51. Zeybek, M., & Kaya, A. (2020). Tarihi yığma kiliselerde hasarların fotogrametrik ölçme tekniğiyle incelenmesi: Artvin Tbeti Kilisesi örneği. Geomatik, 5(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.568584
52. Yiğit, A. Y., & Uysal, M. (2021). Tarihi eserlerin 3B modellenmesi ve artırılmış gerçeklik ile görselleştirilmesi. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 1032-1043. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.1011064
53. Fonstad, M. A., Dietrich, J. T., Courville, B. C., Jensen, J. L., & Carbonneau, P. E. (2013). Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth surface processes and Landforms, 38(4), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3366
54. Carrivick, J. L., & Smith, M. W. (2019). Fluvial and aquatic applications of structure from motion photogrammetry and unmanned aerial vehicle/drone technology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 6(1), e1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1328
55. Yakar, M., Yilmaz, H. M. & Mutluoglu, O. (2010). Close range photogrammetry and robotic total station in volume calculation. International Journal of the Physical Sciences. 5(2), 086-096
56. Fidan, Ş., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y., Hamal, S. N. G., & Yakar, M. (2023). Combination of terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry for heritage building ınformation modeling: A Case Study of Tarsus St. Paul Church. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 89(12), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.23-00031R2
57. Senkal, E., Kaplan, G., & Avdan. U. (2021). Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 6(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.696001
58. Browning Jr, D. C. (2024). Close-range photogrammetry for analysis of rock relief details: An investigation of symbols purported to be Jewish Menorahs in Rough Cilicia. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 6 (1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1434605
59. Kabadayı, A. (2023). Kültürel mirasın dijital arşivlenmesi: Emirci Sultan Türbesi ve Camii örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 5(2), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.53030/tufod.1401899
60. Phillips, N., Blauvelt, C., Ziba, M., Sherman, J., Saka, E., Bancroft, E., & Wilcox, A. (2016). Costs associated with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles for transportation of laboratory samples in Malawi. VillageReach.
61. Djimantoro, M. I., & Suhardjanto, G. (2017). The advantage by using low-altitude UAV for sustainable urban development control. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 109, No. 1, p. 012014). IOP Publishing.
62. Villi, O., & Yakar, M. (2024). Sensor technologies in unmanned aerial vehicles: types and applications. Advanced UAV, 4(1), 1-18.
63. Choi, J. O., & Kim, D. B. (2019). A new UAV-based module lifting and transporting method: Advantages and challenges. In 36th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2019), 21-24 May, Canada.
64. Marangoz, A. M., Karakış, S., & Numan, A. B. (2019). Geleneksel Fotogrametri ile İnsansız Hava Aracı (İHA) Verilerinin Kullanılan Kamera ve Sonuç Ürünleri Bakımından Karşılaştırılması. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 17. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 25-27 Nisan, Ankara.
65. Aicardi, I., Chiabrando, F., Grasso, N., Lingua, A. M., Noardo, F., & Spanò, A. (2016). UAV photogrammetry with oblique images: First analysis on data acquisition and processing. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 835-842. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B1-835-2016
66. Şasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2017). Photogrammetric modelling of sakahane masjid using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 1(2), 82-87.
67. Yiğit Avdan, Z., Mızık, E. T., Göncü, S., Çömert, R. & Avdan, U. (2024). Virtual geographical environment (VGEs) by incorporation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery and acoustic profile for Pond Borabey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9 (3), 406-417. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1475023
68. Memduhoglu, A. (2023). Identifying impervious surfaces for rainwater harvesting feasibility using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery and machine learning classification. Advanced GIS, 3(1), 01-06.
69. Uzar, M., Öztürk, Ş., Bayrak, O. C., Arda, T., & Öcalan, N. T. (2021). Performance analysis of YOLO versions for automatic vehicle detection from UAV images. Advanced Remote Sensing, 1(1), 16-30.
70. Oruç, M. E. (2021). The possibilities of data usage obtained from UAV. Advanced UAV, 1(1), 15-23.
71. Erdoğan, A., Görken, M., & Kabadayı, A. (2022). Study on the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in open mine sites: A case study of Ordu Province Mine Site. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 35-40.
72. Güngör, R., Uzar, M., Atak, B., Yılmaz, O. S., & Gümüş, E. (2022). Orthophoto production and accuracy analysis with UAV photogrammetry. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 4(1), 01-06. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1122615
73. Tabakoglu, C. (2024). A Review: Detection types and systems in remote sensing. Advanced GIS, 4(2), 100-104.
74. Önder, M., Güntel, A., & Kaya, Ö. Y. (2022). A geographical information systems (GIS) perspective on European green deal and sustainability. Advanced GIS, 2(1), 33-37.
75. Fiumi, L. (2023). Remote sensing analysis on Rome’s squares. Advanced Remote Sensing, 3(2), 79-89.
76. Çetin, Ş. B. (2023). Real-ESRGAN: A deep learning approach for general image restoration and its application to aerial images. Advanced Remote Sensing, 3(2), 90-99.