The need for renewal of the cadastral maps on the territory of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia

Abstract

The objective of this research is to establish a ranking of five cadastral municipalities within the administrative municipality of Pancevo in order to determine the priority for the renewal of cadastral maps. To facilitate ranking of cadastral municipalities, the VIKOR method, a multi-criteria optimization technique, was employed. For the optimization of cadastral map renewal in the study area, a list of eight criterion functions (fi), six sub-criteria (kij), and four different combinations of weights (ωi) were adopted to express the varying relative importance of criterion functions. The results obtained, in the form of ranking lists for each combination of weights, facilitated the development of a hierarchy indicating the urgency for initiating cadastral map renewal works. Based on the results, the cadastral municipality of Dolovo is recommended as the optimal compromise solution according to the first combination of weight values. It holds the top position on the compromise ranking list, enjoying a 64.8% advantage over the alternative in second place. For the second combination of weight values, the proposal consists of two alternatives: Dolovo and Omoljica. Dolovo occupies the top position on the compromise ranking list, with a 17.8% advantage over Omoljica in second place. Furthermore, Dolovo also secures the top position on the QR and QS ranking lists, thus representing the optimal compromise solution. The proposal for the third combination of weight values suggests a compromise between Pancevo and Dolovo. Pancevo holds the top position on the compromise ranking list, enjoying a 6.1% advantage over Dolovo in second place. However, Dolovo, with a 35.5% advantage over the alternative in third place, satisfies the condition of a significant advantage. In the fourth combination, Dolovo exhibits a 44.3% advantage over the second alternative.

Keywords

• Graphical geodetic survey
• Real estate cadastre
• Multi-criteria optimization
• VIKOR
• Digital cadastral maps

References

1. 1. Cvijetinović, Z., Avramović, M., & Mihajlović, D. (2015). Digital cadastral map as foundation of coordinate based cadastre of Serbia. Survey Review, 47(343), 241-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000131
2. 2. Ilić, Z., Marinković, G., Lazić, J., & Božić, M. (2021). Current status of real estate cadastre in the republic of Serbia in relation to historical conditions in different regions of the country. 12th International Scientific Conference: Science and Higher Education of Sustainable Development.
3. 3. Ninkov, T., Govedarica, M., & Trifković, M. (2012). One method of renewal of stereographic survey data in Čoka municipality. Geodetski list, 66(2), 101-112.
4. 4. Naod, S., Odalović, O., Brajović, L., & Savanović, R. (2021). History of geodetic works in Vojvodina (Northern Serbia) and use of old maps in Serbian national spatial data infrastructure. Survey Review, 54(383), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2021.1886546
5. 5. Ashok Deo Bardhan, Edelstein, R. H., & Kroll, C. A. (2012). Global housing markets: crises, policies, and institutions. Hoboken, Nj: Wiley.
6. 6. Savanović, R. (2005) The study of graphic survey points coordinates transformation model from the stereographic into Gauss-Krüger projection in Vojvodina. (Unpublished Thesis) University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
7. 7. Bennett, R., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2010, April). Cadastral Futures: Building a New Vision for the Nature and Role of Cadastres. Paper presented at the FIG Congress, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rohan-Bennett/publication/242488652_Cadastral_Futures_Building_a_New_Vision_for_the_Nature_and_Role_of_Cadastres/links/0deec52a18598d0391000000/Cadastral-Futures-Building-a-New-Vision-for-the-Nature-and-Role-of-Cadastres.pdf
8. 8. Demir, O., Köse, F., Yıldız, O., & Çoruhlu, Y. E. (2017). Determining and finding solutions to the sectoral problems of cadastre in Turkey. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 35(4), 679–693. https://sigma.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1635946814-en.pdf

9. 9. Bacior, S. (2023). Austrian cadastre still in use – Example proceedings to determine the legal status of land property in southern Poland. Land Use Policy, 131, 106740–106740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106740
10. 10. Pivac, D., Roić, M., Križanović, J., Paar, R. (2021). Availability of Historical Cadastral Data. Land, 10, 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10090917
11. 11. Vasiljević, D., Radulović, B., Babović, M., & Todorović, S. (2018). Land consolidation as unused potential. National Alliance for Local Economic Development – NALED. https://upz.minpolj.gov.rs/download/Land_Consolidation%20Study-%20Serbia.pdf
12. 12. Rodić, V., Bošnjak, D., & Vukelić, N. (2007, June). Sustainability of agricultural land management in the autonomous province of Vojvodina. Paper presented at the 100th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Novi Sad, Serbia. Retrieved from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162353
13. 13. Bu´sko, M., Zyga, J., Hudecová, L’., Kysel’, P., Balawejder, M., & Apollo, M. (2022). Active Collection of Data in the Real Estate Cadastre in Systems with a Different Pedigree and a Different Way of Building Development: Learning from Poland and Slovakia. Sustainability, 14, 15046. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su142215046
14. 14. Ercan, O. (2023). The impact of European Union legislation on cadastral surveyors: a comparative analysis and results in the Europea and Türkiye. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(4), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1366444
15. 15. Šeremešić, S., Marinković, D., Manojlović, M., Jovović, Z., Ćirić, V., Vasin, J., & Vojnov, B. (2021). Soil organic matter pools and aggregate fractions in organic and conventional winter wheat cropping in Vojvodina province of Serbia. Agriculture and Forestry, 67(3). https://doi.org/10.17707/agricultforest.67.3.15
16. 16. Forcan, D., Ivić, M., Đuranović, D., & Vuković, V. (2016). Sustainable development of rural areas: Case studies Vojvodina - Serbia. Škola Biznisa, (2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5937/skolbiz2-11666
17. 17. Dodić, S. N., Vučurović, D. G., Popov, S. D., Dodić, J. M., & Zavargo, Z. Z. (2010). Concept of cleaner production in Vojvodina. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(6), 1629-1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.004
18. 18. Rulebook on cadastral surveying, cadastral renewal and geodetic works in the maintenance of the real estate cadastre. Republic Geodetic Authority. (2020). Retrieved from URL: http://demo.paragraf.rs/demo/combined/Old/t/t2020_03/SG_26_2020_004.htm
19. 19. Valizadeh Kamran, K., & Khorrami, B. (2022). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for the assessment of forest health applying hyper spectral imageries: A case study from Ramsar forest, North of Iran. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(3), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.940166
20. 20. Şentürk, E., & Erener, A. (2017). Determination of temporary shelter areas in natural disasters by GIS: a case study, Gölcük/Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(3), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.317314
21. 21. Law on State Survey and Cadastre. National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia. (2023). Retrieved from URL: https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_drzavnom_premeru_i_katastru.html
22. 22. Regulation on digital geodetic map. Government of Republic of Serbia. (2008). Retrieved from URL: http://www.pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/eli/rep/sgrs/vlada/uredba/2003/15/1/reg/
23. 23. Geodetski normativi. (1990). Belgrade: Business Association "Jugogeodet".
24. 24. Ploskas, N., & Papathanasiou, J. (2019). A decision support system for multiple criteria alternative ranking using TOPSIS and VIKOR in fuzzy and nonfuzzy environments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 377, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2019.01.012
25. 25. Govedarica, O., Dašić, T., Stanić, M., Rajaković-Ognjanović, V., & Đukić, A. (2020). Analiza i izbor optimalne metode omekšavanja vode primenom VIKOR i AHP metode – studija slučaja. Vodoprivreda, 52(2020), 235-247. https://www.vodoprivreda.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/7-Ognjen-Govedarica-i-saradnici.pdf
26. 26. Opricović, S. (1998). Višekriterijmska optimizacija sistema u građevinarstvu. Beograd, Srbija: Građevinski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
27. 27. Onder, E., & Yildirim, B. F. (2014). VIKOR method for ranking logistic villages in Turkey. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 12(23), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.11611/JMER236
28. 28. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
29. 29. Žepinić, T. (2019). Multiple attribute decision making in development planning of distribution networks. Zbornik radova Fakulteta tehničkih nauka, 34(09) 1590-1593. https://doi.org/10.24867/04BE22Zepinic