Research Article

Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images

Volume: 9 Number: 2 June 2, 2022
EN

Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images

Abstract

Many different disciplines use deep Learning algorithms for various purposes. In recent years, object detection by deep learning from aerial or terrestrial images has become a popular research area. In this study, object detection application was performed by training the YOLOv2 and YOLOv3 algorithms in the Google Colaboratory cloud service with the help of Python software language with the DOTA dataset consisting of aerial photographs. 43 aerial photographs containing 9 class objects were used for evaluation. Accuracy analyzes of these two algorithms were made according to Recall, Precision and F-score for 9 classes, and the results were compared accordingly. YOLOv2 gave better results in 5 out of 9 classes, while YOLOv3 gave better results in recognizing small objects. While YOLOv2 can detect objects in an average photograph in 43 seconds, YOLOv3 has achieved superior performance in terms of time by detecting objects in an average of 2.5 seconds.

Keywords

References

  1. Cepni, S., Atik, M. E., & Duran, Z. (2020). Vehicle detection using different deep learning algorithms from image sequence. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 8(2), 347-358.
  2. Atik, M. E., & Duran, Z. (2020, October). Deep Learning-Based 3D Face Recognition Using Derived Features from Point Cloud. In The Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart City Applications (pp. 797-808). Springer, Cham.
  3. Atik, S. O., & Ipbuker, C. (2021). Ship Detection from Satellite Images with Instance Segmentation (Uydu Görüntülerinden Örnek Segmentasyonu ile Gemi Tespiti). 18. Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 29-29 Mayıs 2021, Ankara.
  4. Atik, S. O., & Ipbuker, C. (2020). Instance Segmentation Of Crowd Detection In The Camera Images. In Proceeding of Asian Conference on Remote Sensing 2020 (ACRS 2020).
  5. Yang, M. Y., Liao, W., Li, X., Cao, Y., & Rosenhahn, B. (2019). Vehicle Detection in Aerial Images. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing: PE&RS, 85(4), 297-304.
  6. Chen, E., Gong, Y., Tie, Y. (2016). Advances in Multimedia Information Processing. Category Aggregation Among Region Proposals for Object Detection. China: 17th Pasific Rim Conference on Multimedia Xi’an, 210-211.
  7. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., & Girshick, R. (2017). Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 2961-2969).
  8. Girshick, R. (2015). Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 1440-1448).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 2, 2022

Submission Date

October 16, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 30, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Atik, M. E., Duran, Z., & Özgünlük, R. (2022). Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 9(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1010741
AMA
1.Atik ME, Duran Z, Özgünlük R. Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images. IJEGEO. 2022;9(2):87-93. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.1010741
Chicago
Atik, Muhammed Enes, Zaide Duran, and Roni Özgünlük. 2022. “Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9 (2): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1010741.
EndNote
Atik ME, Duran Z, Özgünlük R (June 1, 2022) Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9 2 87–93.
IEEE
[1]M. E. Atik, Z. Duran, and R. Özgünlük, “Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images”, IJEGEO, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 87–93, June 2022, doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.1010741.
ISNAD
Atik, Muhammed Enes - Duran, Zaide - Özgünlük, Roni. “Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 9/2 (June 1, 2022): 87-93. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1010741.
JAMA
1.Atik ME, Duran Z, Özgünlük R. Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images. IJEGEO. 2022;9:87–93.
MLA
Atik, Muhammed Enes, et al. “Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, vol. 9, no. 2, June 2022, pp. 87-93, doi:10.30897/ijegeo.1010741.
Vancouver
1.Muhammed Enes Atik, Zaide Duran, Roni Özgünlük. Comparison of YOLO Versions for Object Detection from Aerial Images. IJEGEO. 2022 Jun. 1;9(2):87-93. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.1010741

Cited By