Research Article

Turkey's Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty

Volume: 8 Number: 3 September 5, 2021
EN

Turkey's Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty

Abstract

The Arctic Ocean's becoming open wider to international navigation for most of the time in parallel with global warming has attracted the attention of the world to this region. As the Covid-19 pandemic reveals the necessity to deliver products to the global market as quickly as possible, the possibility of intense use of the Arctic Ocean is increasing. This study aims to emphasize the increasing importance of the Arctic region from a maritime economics perspective and on the other hand to discuss the possible effects of being a party for Turkey to the Svalbard (originally Spitsbergen) Treaty. It is expected that the increase in global temperatures will result in important outcomes in the region especially regarding the new emerging navigational routes and sharing of the natural resources in the region. Analysis has been made on the impact of new security concerns on the sustainable maritime economy likely to arise in the Arctic region. As a result, the importance of mutual international efforts to maintain stability was emphasized and the importance of being a party to the Svalbard Treaty for Turkey was highlighted.

Keywords

References

  1. ACIA. (2004). Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Aksenov, Y., Popova, E., Yool, A., Nurser, A., Williams, T., Bertino, L., & Bergh, J. (2017). On The Future Navigability of Arctic Sea Routes: High-Resolution Projections of The Arctic Ocean and Sea Ice. Marine Policy, 75, 300-317.
  3. AMAP. (1998). AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway.
  4. AMAP. (2017). Snow, Water, Ice, and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA) 2017. Oslo, Norway. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).
  5. AMAP. (2019). AMAP Climate Change Update 2019: An Update to Key Findings of Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA) 2017. Oslo, Norway. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).
  6. The Arctic region (2021). Map (Figure 1). Retrieved (26 January 2021) from https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arktik_Okyanusu Ayrault, J. M. (2016). The Great Challenge of the Arctic National Roadmap for the Arctic, Paris: Press and Communication Directorate of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development of France.
  7. Chater, A. and Greaves, W. (2014). Security Governance in the Arctic. In Jim Sperling (Ed.), Handbook on Governance and Security, Edward Elgar Publishing, p.123-147.
  8. Cheng, L., Abraham, J., Hausfather, Z., & Trenberth, K. (2019). How fast are the oceans warming? Science, 363(6423), p.128-129.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Human Geography

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 5, 2021

Submission Date

February 26, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 11, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Çetin, O., & Büyüksağnak, Y. B. (2021). Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 8(3), 350-358. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.887540
AMA
1.Çetin O, Büyüksağnak YB. Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. IJEGEO. 2021;8(3):350-358. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.887540
Chicago
Çetin, Oktay, and Yaşar Barbaros Büyüksağnak. 2021. “Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: The Possible Effects of Being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8 (3): 350-58. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.887540.
EndNote
Çetin O, Büyüksağnak YB (September 1, 2021) Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8 3 350–358.
IEEE
[1]O. Çetin and Y. B. Büyüksağnak, “Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty”, IJEGEO, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 350–358, Sept. 2021, doi: 10.30897/ijegeo.887540.
ISNAD
Çetin, Oktay - Büyüksağnak, Yaşar Barbaros. “Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: The Possible Effects of Being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8/3 (September 1, 2021): 350-358. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.887540.
JAMA
1.Çetin O, Büyüksağnak YB. Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. IJEGEO. 2021;8:350–358.
MLA
Çetin, Oktay, and Yaşar Barbaros Büyüksağnak. “Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: The Possible Effects of Being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty”. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2021, pp. 350-8, doi:10.30897/ijegeo.887540.
Vancouver
1.Oktay Çetin, Yaşar Barbaros Büyüksağnak. Turkey’s Interest in the Arctic Region: the Possible Effects of being a Party to the Svalbard Treaty. IJEGEO. 2021 Sep. 1;8(3):350-8. doi:10.30897/ijegeo.887540

Cited By