A Research on the Characteristics of the Inspiring Teacher

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to find out the characteristics of inspiring teachers who inspired teacher candidates to do teaching profession properly. In the study, “An Exploratory Sequential Design” a mixed method where qualitative and quantitative approaches are used concomitantly, was employed to determine the inspiring teacher characteristics. In this design, two steps were respectively followed by the researcher. In the first step grounded theory research design as a qualitative research design was used and in the second step survey research model as a quantitative research design was used. Inspiring Teacher Scale (ITS) was developed by the researchers to collect the data. In the second phase, the study group was extended to continue the quantitative studies. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used first to analyze the data. The results of analysis have demonstrated that the items loaded on four factors, which reflect inspiring teacher characteristics as “teacher communication”, “personal characteristics”, “professional development” and “supporting students in different ways”. Findings suggest that ITS, which has four-factor structures with 36 items, can be suggested as a valid and reliable instrument to determine the characteristics of inspiring teacher. Therefore, in this study the characteristics inspiring teachers were specified according to opinions of teacher candidates and presented to be o model for teacher candidates.

Keywords

• Education,teaching,inspiring teacher,teacher candidate,grounded theory

References

1. Beane, J. A., & Brodhagen, B. L. (2001). Teaching in middle schools. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 1157-1174). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4. Bilen, M. (1996). Plandan uygulamaya ogretim [Plan to practice]. Ankara: Aydan Publishing.
5. Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Deneysel Desenler [Experimental patterns]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
6. Buyukozturk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
7. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 14(3), 464-504.

9. Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mix methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7-12.
10. Celikten, M., Sanal, M., & Yeni, Y. (2005). Ogretmenlik meslegi ve ozellikleri [Teaching profession and features]. Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 19(2), 207-237.
11. Demirel, O. (1999). Planlamadan degerlendirmeye ogretme sanati [The art of teaching from planning to evaluation]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
12. Dowling, M. (1988). Education 3 to 5: A teachers’ handbook (pp.108-120). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
13. Erturk, S. (1998). Egitimde program gelistirme [Curriculum development in education] (10th Edition). Ankara: Meteksan.
14. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Soltis, J. F. (1998). Approaches to teaching (3rd Edition ). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Freeman, W., & Scheidecker, D. (2009). Becoming a legendary teacher to instruct and inspire. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16. Gao, L., & Watkins, D. A. (2001). Identifying and assessing the conceptions of teaching of secondary school physics teachers in China. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 443-469.
17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine.
18. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
19. Gurkan, T. (1986). Ogretmen tutumlarinin okuloncesi cocuklari uzerindeki etkileri [The effects of teacher attitudes on preschool children]. Ankara: Ya-pa 4. Seminar on School Education and Dissemination, 124-125.
20. Guven, S. (2016). Ogretmen adaylarinin bakis acisi ile egitim fakulteleri [Faculties of education with the perspective of prospective teachers]. Canakkale: VIII. International Educational Research Congress, 2020-2027.
21. Hergenhahn, B. R. ( 1988). An Introduction To Teories of Learning, (3th Ed.), New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
22. Karagozoglu, G. (2003). Egitim sistemimizde ogretmen yetistirme politikamiza genel bir bakis [An overview of our teacher training policy in our education system]. Paper Presented at the Reflections in Education: VII Cagdas Education Teacher Training Symposium, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
23. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
24. Ozden, Y. (1999). Egitimde donusum egitimde yeni degerler [New values in education in education transformation]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
25. Pratt, D. D., Arseneau, R., & Collins, J. B. (2001). Reconsidering "good teaching" across the continuum of medical education. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21, 70-81.
26. Raykov T, & Marcoulides GA.( 2006). Fundamentals of Structural Equation Modeling. A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Ed.) (pp.1-43). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Senemoglu, N. (1997). Gelisim Ogrenme ve Ogretim Kuramdan Uygulamaya [Development learning and teaching from theory to practice]. Ankara: Spot Publication.
28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Sullo, R. A. (1999). The inspiring teacher: New beginnings for the 21st century. The Inspired Classroom Series. National Education Association, Washington, DC.
30. Unal, L. I., Gumus, A., Gurbuz, C., Karsli, M. D., Guven, S., Yildizlar, … Ural, A. (2011). Turkiye’de ogretmen yetistirme [Teacher training in Turkey]. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
31. Ustunoglu, U. (1986). Okul oncesi ogretmenlerin uzaktan ogretim yontemi ile yetistirilmelerine yonelik program modeli [Program model for the training of preschool teachers by distance education method] (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
32. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2001). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin Publishing.
33. Varis, F. (1988). Program gelistirme teori ve teknikleri. [Program development theory and techniques]. Ankara: Ankara University Publishing.
34. Vieira, A. L. (2011). Preparation of the Analysis: Interactive LISREL in Practice (1st ed.) (pp.4-13). London: Springer.