A Review of Shear Resistance of Rockfill Using Large Scale Shear Tests

Kaveh Dehghanian; Sayed Mansoor Zafar; Emrah Çaltılı; Beste Koçak Dinç; Hakan Murat Soysal

A Review of Shear Resistance of Rockfill Using Large Scale Shear Tests

Abstract

Earth and rockfill dams, because of their special characteristics compared to concrete dams, are Abstract: Earth and rockfill dams, because of their special characteristics compared to concrete dams, are widely used in construction throughout the world. Rockfill dams are more flexible, have capacity to absorb widely used in construction throughout the world. Rockfill dams are more flexible, have capacity to absorb large seismic energy, and adaptability to various foundation conditions. The use of modern earth and rock large seismic energy, and adaptability to various foundation conditions. The use of modern earth and rock equipment and locally available materials make such dams economical as well. Therefore, improving the equipment and locally available materials make such dams economical as well. Therefore, improving the knowledge of experts about the design and maintenance of these dams are vital. Different reports of knowledge of experts about the design and maintenance of these dams are vital. Different reports of settlement and deformation of operating rockfill dams depict the importance of technique improvements settlement and deformation of operating rockfill dams depict the importance of technique improvements and designing new test apparatus to monitor them. and designing new test apparatus to monitor them. The behavior of these materials, specifically their shear strength are not fully understood. Several types of The behavior of these materials, specifically their shear strength are not fully understood. Several types of laboratory devices have been developed to estimate the strength of these materials. Among these devices, laboratory devices have been developed to estimate the strength of these materials. Among these devices, direct shear test has been employed most commonly owing to its simplicity and low-cost compared to direct shear test has been employed most commonly owing to its simplicity and low-cost compared to triaxial and other methods. Traditional laboratory direct shear tests are not appropriate for investigation of triaxial and other methods. Traditional laboratory direct shear tests are not appropriate for investigation of rockfill materials which have large-sized particles. In this case, laboratory large scale direct shear tests are rockfill materials which have large-sized particles. In this case, laboratory large scale direct shear tests are required to be performed on these materials. In this paper, a brief review of parameters affecting shear required to be performed on these materials. In this paper, a brief review of parameters affecting shear resistance of these particles and a history of large scale tests are presented.

Keywords

References

Anagnosti, P. & Popovic, M., 1982. Evaluation of shear strength for coarse-grained granular materials. In Fouteenth Congres on Large Dams. Rio de Janeiro, 1982. ICOLD.
Asadzadeh M., “Direct shear testing on rockfill material”. Arabian journal for science and engineering, vol 34, number 2B October, pp 379-396, (2009). ASTM D3080/D3080M – 11, “Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions”, (2004).
Bagherzadeh A., “Numerical and experimental direct shear tests for coarse grained soils”. Journal of Particuology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 83-91, (2009).
Barton, N., and Kjanernsli., “Shear strength of rockfill”. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 107, No. 7, July 1981, pp. 873-891, (1981).
Barton, N.R. “Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints”. Engineering Geology, vol. 7, issue 4, pp. 287-332, (1973).
Barton, N.R. “The shear strength of rock and rock joints”. International Journal for Rock Mechanics, Mining Sciences and Geomechanical Abstracts, vol.13, No.9, pp. 255-279, (1976).
Cerato, A.B. & Lutenegger, A.J.,” Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands”. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 29(6), pp.1-10, (2006).
Cetin H. et al., “Settlement and slaking problems in the world’s fourth largest rock-fill dam, the Ataturk Dam in Turkey”. Engineering Geology, vol.56. pp. 225–242, (2000).

[ 10] Charles J.A., “The engineering behaviour of fill materials: the use, misuse and disuse of case histories”. Geotechnique 58, No. 7, 541–570, (2008).
[ 11] Charles, J.A. & Watts, S.K. The influence of confining pressure on the shear strength of compacted rockfill, Geotechnique, 30(4), pp.353-67, (1980).
[ 12] Frossard E. et al. “Rockfill shear strength evaluation: a rational method based on size effects”. Ge ́otechnique 62, No. 5, 415–427, (2012).
[ 13] Ghanbari A. et al., “An Experimental Study on the Behavior of Rockfill Materials Using Large Scale Tests”. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 13, Bundle G, (2008).
[ 14] Hamidi A., “Impact of gradation on the shear strength-dilation behavior of well graded sand-gravel mixtures”. Scientia Iranica, Volume 19, Issue 3, June 2012, pp. 393–402, (2012).
[ 15] Innachione A.T, Vallejo L.E., “Shear strength evaluation of clay- rock mixtures”. Book Chapter TA - Slope Stability 2000, (2000).
[ 16] Indraratna, B., “The effect of normal stress -friction angle relationship on the stability analysis of a rockfill dam”. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 12, pp.113- 21, (1994).
[ 17] Indraratna, B., Ionescu, D. and Christie, H.D. “Shear behaviour of railway ballast based on large- scale triaxial tests”.Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol.124 (5), pp. 439- 449, (1998).
[ 18] Indraratna, B., Wijewardena, L.S.S. and Balasubramaniam, A.S. “Large-scale triaxial testing of greywacke rockfill”. Geotechnique, 43 (1), pp. 37-51, (1993).
[ 19] Jewell, R. A. and Wroth, C. P., “Direct Shear Tests on Reinforced Sand”. Geotechnique, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 53–68, (1987).
[ 20] Kohgo, Y., I. Asano, and Y. Hayashida. ” Mechanical properties of unsatured low quality rockfills. Soils and Foundations 47(5), 947–959, (2007).
[ 21] Lee, D.S., Kim, K.Y., Oh, G.D. & Jeong, S.S, “Shear characteristics of coarse aggregates sourced from quarries”. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 46, pp.210-18, (2008).
[ 22] Leps, T.”Review of shearing strength of rockfill”. Journal of the Soils Mechanics and Foundations Division. ASCE 96(SM4), 1159–1170, (1970).
[ 23] Marachi, D.N., Chan, C.K. & Seed, B.H., “Evaluation of properties of rockfill materials”. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 98(SM1), pp.95-114, (1972).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kaveh Dehghanian ^* This is me
Türkiye

Sayed Mansoor Zafar This is me
Türkiye

Emrah Çaltılı This is me
Türkiye

Beste Koçak Dinç
Türkiye

Hakan Murat Soysal This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 1, 2019

Submission Date

October 5, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 11, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 9 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA52PD49BK

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Dehghanian, K., Zafar, S. M., Çaltılı, E., Koçak Dinç, B., & Soysal, H. M. (2019). A Review of Shear Resistance of Rockfill Using Large Scale Shear Tests. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 9(1), 1647-1656. https://izlik.org/JA52PD49BK