The implications of Kantian Ethics for Non-rational Nature/Beings: A Study in Environmental Ethics

Abstract

This article will provide an introduction to Immanuel Kant’s ethical theory, which adopts a deontological perspective, as well as his viewpoint on non-rational beings. This work consists of two components. In the first section, we will extensively discuss Kant’s concepts of the categorical imperative and good will. Kant’s ethical philosophy is founded upon the concept of logical decision-making that is guided by a sense of responsibility. As per his perspective, all phenomena in the natural world operate in line with inherent rules, whereas only entities possessing rationality have the capacity to act in alignment with moral principles and possess the faculty of volition. In the following section, we will examine Immanuel Kant’s concept of moral duty towards things that lack rationality. According to Kant, individuals have responsibilities only to themselves and their fellow human beings. Humans are not morally obligated to fulfill any duties or responsibilities towards non-rational beings. Kant posited the notion that the act of murdering animals and the destruction of natural beauty were deemed immoral due to their consequential impact on an individual’s sense of self-accountability and the heightened probability of mistreating fellow human beings.

Keywords

• Environmental Ethics
• Kantian Ethics
• Non-rational Nature
• categorical imperative

References

1. Altman, M. C. 2011. Kant and applied ethics: The uses and limits of Kant's practical philosophy. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Anthony, G. B., & Essien, C. K. 2018a. Sustainable management of solid waste in Nigerian urban centres. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 15(3), 1-10.
3. Anthony, G. B., & Essien, C. K. 2018b. Environmental Awareness creation through the mass media: an important tool in sustainable forest management in Ogoja Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 15(4), 1-14.
4. Anthony, G. B., Essien, C. K., & Obibessong, V. M. 2019. Sustainable tourism development in Southern Senatorial District of Cross River State, Nigeria: the role of indigenous carnivals. Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 16(4), 131-140.
5. Insole, C. J. 2020. Kant and the divine: From contemplation to the moral law. Oxford University Press.
6. Kant, I. 1908. Critique of pure reason. 1781. Modern Classical Philosophers, Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 370-456.
7. Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
8. Kant, I. 2002. Critique of practical reason. Hackett Publishing.

9. Kant, I. 2013. Moral law: Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Routledge.
10. Korsgaard, C. M. 1996. Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press.
11. Korsgaard, C. M. 2013. Kantian ethics, animals, and the law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(4), 629-648.
12. Koukouzelis, K. 2015. Autonomy and Duties regarding Non-Human Nature1. Synthesis philosophica, 59(1), 61-72.
13. MacKinnon, B., & Fiala, A. (2014). Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues. Cengage Learning.
14. Moran, K. A. (Ed.). 2018. Kant on freedom and spontaneity. Cambridge University Press.
15. Nussbaum, M. C. 2011. Perfectionist liberalism and political liberalism. Philosophy & public affairs, 39(1), 3-45.
16. Paton, H. J. 1971. The categorical imperative: A study in Kant's moral philosophy (Vol. 1023). University of Pennsylvania Press.
17. Poma, A. 2012. The critical philosophy of Hermann Cohen. State University of New York Press.
18. Umotong, I. 2012. Religious Factor in African Politics. African Political Philosophy, 237-249.
19. Willaschek, M. 2006. Practical reason. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, C. Horn, Ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 121-139.
20. Wood, A. 2017. The final form of Kant’s practical philosophy. In Immanuel Kant (pp. 27-47). Routledge.
21. Wood, A. W. 1991. Unsociable sociability: The anthropological basis of Kantian ethics. Philosophical topics, 19(1), 325-351.