Modern Technologies in Remediation of Heavy Metals in Soils
Abstract
Environmental pollution becomes
an important paradigm in our society to reservation of the environment.
Worldwide, concerns have been voiced about numerous soil and water
contaminants. The concern comes from the fact that the magnification of very
small amounts of these pollutants have resulted in adverse effects on bio-systems.
The increasing use of heavy metal-contaminated sewage sludge as agricultural
fertilizer, these elements may pass into the soil solution where plant uptake
or leaching to groundwater can contaminate the food chain. Several cleanup
methods have been investigated, which can be divided into two groups: those
that remove contaminants and those that transform pollutants into harmless
forms (immobilization) by fixation, oxidation, etc. These cleanup technologies
can be applied on- or off-site, utilizing three kinds of remediation
treatments: biological, physical, and chemical techniques. It is most
convenient to divide them into three major categories: first, electro kinetic methods, second chemical
methods such as solidification, precipitation, or ion exchange, and third, biological methods, which use
plants or microorganism to remove heavy metals. In the past few years,
innovative approaches such as passive treatment technologies
for soil and groundwater contaminations have been developed. The following
state of art introduces the various remediation technologies applied in
contaminated soil systems with comments about the best of these technologies
should be applied under Egyptian conditions to minimize their injures.
Keywords
References
- [1] Yalcin B. A. and N. Alshawabkeh (2009) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol., (27): 2638-2647.
- [2] Zhemin, S; J. Bingxin; C. Xuejun and W. Wang (2008). Relations between sorption behaviour and Electrokinetic remediation effect in soils contaminated with heavy metals. Australian J. Soil Research (46): 485-491.
- [3] Yuan, S.H.; C. Wu, J.Z. Wan and X.H. Lu, (2008) Electromigration of cadmium in contaminated soils driven by single and multiple primary cells. Journal of Hazardous Materials (151): 594-602.
- [4] Songhu Y.; Z. Zheng; J. and C. X. Lu. (2009). Use of solar cell in electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials (162): 1583–1587
- [5] Ching Y. and T. Chiang (2008). Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic spiked soil by chemical reagents. Journal of Hazardous Materials (152) 309–315
- [6] Maja P. and D. Lestan (2008). EDTA leaching of Cu contaminated soil using electrochemical treatment of the washing solution. Journal of Hazardous Materials (165) 533-539. [7] Do-Hyung K.; B. Gon Ryua; S.W. Parka, C. Seoa, and b. Kitae Baeka. (2008). Electrokinetic remediation of Zn and Ni-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials (16): 501-505.
- [8] Sajida B. (2003). Field validation of bentazon phytoremediation. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Environmental Studies, Louisiana State University, USA.
- [9] Lesage, E; E. Meers; P. Vervaeke and S. Lamsal (2005). Enhanced phytoextraction: II. Effect of EDTA and citric acid on heavy metals uptake by Hellanthus Annuus from a calcareous soil. Inter. J. Phytoremediation (7): 426-437.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Environmental Sciences
Journal Section
Review
Publication Date
January 2, 2019
Submission Date
January 2, 2019
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 2 Number: 1