Investigation of the effects of installation parameters of bifacial PV systems on energy yield and determination of optimal tilt angle: A case study for Konya

Year 2026, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 1 - 24, 17.03.2026

Ömer Gönül

https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1782295

https://izlik.org/JA87SM82MR

Abstract

The application areas of photovoltaic (PV) systems that allow scalable modular design are becoming increasingly widespread, ranging from residential installations to utility-scale power generation. In recent years, bifacial PV (bPV) systems have gained widespread attention due to their capability to harvest solar irradiance from both the front and rear surfaces, thereby increasing energy yield per unit area. The technical potential of PV systems is location-specific and varies according to numerous climatic and geographical factors. In this study, a comparative technical analysis of bifacial and monofacial PV systems is conducted for Konya, one of the regions with the highest solar energy installation potential in Türkiye, using the System Advisor Model (SAM). Moreover, sensitivity analyses are performed for parameters such as albedo, ground clearance height, and ground coverage ratio (GCR), which affect the energy output of bifacial systems. According to the results, bPV systems provide 5.23% higher energy output compared to monofacial systems under commonly used PV installation conditions. However, it is possible to achieve up to 21.10% higher energy yield by adjusting parameters such as the albedo coefficient, ground clearance height, and GCR that influence bPV performance. These findings demonstrate that bPV systems can provide substantial energy gains under suitable design and site conditions, enabling more efficient utilization of solar energy resources

Keywords

Bifacial systems , Monofacial systems , Photovoltaic , Optimal tilt , Technical feasibility

References

• [1] International Energy Agency (IEA). Snapshot of Global PV Markets 2025. 2025.
• [2] Our World in Data. Solar photovoltaic module price. 2024.
• [3] IRENA. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023. 2024.
• [4] Kopecek R, Libal J. Towards large-scale deployment of bifacial photovoltaics. Nature Energy 2018;3:443–6.
• [5] Rodrigo PM, Mouhib E, Fernandez EF, Almonacid F, Rosas-Caro JC. Comprehensive ground coverage analysis of large-scale fixed-tilt bifacial photovoltaic plants. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024;192:114229.
• [6] Asgharzadeh A, Marion B, Deline C, Hansen C, Stein JS, Toor F. A Sensitivity Study of the Impact of Installation Parameters and System Configuration on the Performance of Bifacial PV Arrays. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2018;8:798–805.
• [7] Sun X, Khan MR, Deline C, Alam MA. Optimization and performance of bifacial solar modules: A global perspective. Applied Energy 2018;212:1601–10.
• [8] Konya Metropolitan Municipality. 2024 district-based solar power plant installed capacity data of Konya. Konya Open Data Portal 2024. https://acikveri.konya.bel.tr/en/dataset/ilce-mahalle-bazli-gunes-enerji-santralleri-ve-kurulu-guc-miktarlari/resource/4779a299-bb8c-46eb-a010-58f948c10de5.
• [9] Abdelaal AK, El-Fergany A. Estimation of optimal tilt angles for photovoltaic panels in Egypt with experimental verifications. Nature Scientific Reports 2023;13:3268.
• [10] Jing J, Zhou Y, Wang L, Liu Y, Wang D. The spatial distribution of China’s solar energy resources and the optimum tilt angle and power generation potential of PV systems. Energy Conversion and Management 2023;283:116912.
• [11] Mukisa N, Zamora R. Optimal tilt angle for solar photovoltaic modules on pitched rooftops: A case of low latitude equatorial region. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2022;50:101821.
• [12] Mansour RB, Khan MAM, Alsulaiman FA, Mansour RB. Optimizing the Solar PV Tilt Angle to Maximize the Power Output: A Case Study for Saudi Arabia. IEEE Access 2021;9:15914–28.
• [13] González-González E, Martín-Jiménez J, Sánchez-Aparicio M, Del Pozo S, Lagüela S. Evaluating the standards for solar PV installations in the Iberian Peninsula: Analysis of tilt angles and determination of solar climate zones. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2022;49:101684.
• [14] Ayodele TR, Ogunjuyigbe ASO, Nwakanma KC. Solar energy harvesting on building’s rooftops: A case of a Nigeria cosmopolitan city. Renewable Energy Focus 2021;38:57–70.
• [15] Yunus Khan TM, Soudagar MEM, Kanchan M, Afzal A, Banapurmath NR, Akram N, et al. Optimum location and influence of tilt angle on performance of solar PV panels. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2020;141:511–32.
• [16] Ullah A, Imran H, Maqsood Z, Butt NZ. Investigation of optimal tilt angles and effects of soiling on PV energy production in Pakistan. Renewable Energy 2019;139:830–43.
• [17] Abdallah R, Juaidi A, Abdel-Fattah S, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Estimating the Optimum Tilt Angles for South-Facing Surfaces in Palestine. Energies 2020;13.
• [18] Nicolás-Martín C, Santos-Martín D, Chinchilla-Sánchez M, Lemon S. A global annual optimum tilt angle model for photovoltaic generation to use in the absence of local meteorological data. Renewable Energy 2020;161:722–35.
• [19] Ali Morad AM, Shaker Al-Sayyab AK, Abdulwahid MA. Optimisation of tilted angles of a photovoltaic cell to determine the maximum generated electric power: A case study of some Iraqi cities. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 2018;12:484–8.
• [20] Bailek N, Bouchouicha K, Aoun N, EL-Shimy M, Jamil B, Mostafaeipour A. Optimized fixed tilt for incident solar energy maximization on flat surfaces located in the Algerian Big South. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2018;28:96–102.
• [21] Ferry A, Parenti M, Thebault M, Ménézo C, Fossa M. Optimal tilt angles for bifacial photovoltaic plants across Europe based on cumulative sky and Typical Meteorological Year data. Solar Energy 2025;293:113475.
• [22] Yakubu RO, Ankoh MT, Mensah LD, Quansah DA, Adaramola MS. Predicting the Potential Energy Yield of Bifacial Solar PV Systems in Low-Latitude Region. Energies 2022;15.
• [23] Berrian D, Libal J, Klenk M, Nussbaumer H, Kopecek R. Performance of Bifacial PV Arrays With Fixed Tilt and Horizontal Single-Axis Tracking: Comparison of Simulated and Measured Data. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2019;9:1583–9.
• [24] Radwan A, Mdallal A, Haridy S, Abdelkareem MA, Alami AH, Olabi AG. Optimizing the annual energy yield of a residential bifacial photovoltaic system using response surface methodology. Renewable Energy 2024;222:119914.
• [25] Baghel N, Manjunath K, Kumar A. Performance evaluation and optimization of albedo and tilt angle for solar photovoltaic system. Computer and Electrical Engineering 2023;110:108849.
• [26] Dong Q, Wu X, Song Y, Du Y, Qi J, Huang L, et al. Temperature behaviors of transparent solar PV panels under various operating modes: an experimental and numerical study. Renewable Energy 2025;250:123279.
• [27] Pelaez SA, Deline C, MacAlpine SM, Marion B, Stein JS, Kostuk RK. Comparison of Bifacial Solar Irradiance Model Predictions With Field Validation. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2019;9:82–8.
• [28] Perez R, Ineichen P, Seals R, Michalsky J, Stewart R. Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy 1990;44:271–89.
• [29] NREL. System Advisor Model n.d. https://sam.nrel.gov/.
• [30] DiOrio N, Deline C. Bifacial Simulation in SAM. Colorado: 2018.
• [31] Duffie JA, Beckman WA. Solar engineering of thermal processes. Fourth edi. Wiley, New Jersey, 2013.
• [32] Gilman P, Dobos A, DiOrio N, Freeman J, Janzou S, Ryberg D. SAM Photovoltaic Model Technical Reference Update. 2018.
• [33] Kalogirou SA. Solar energy engineering. Academic Press, 2013.
• [34] Marion B, MacAlpine S, Deline C, Asgharzadeh A, Toor F, Riley D, et al. A Practical irradiance model for bifacial PV modules. IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2017, p. 1537–42.
• [35] Sjerps-Koomen EA, Alsema EA, Turkenburg WC. A simple model for PV module reflection losses under field conditions. Solar Energy 1996;57:421–32.
• [36] Benbba R, Akhsassi M, El mouden H, Wifaya A, Outzourhit A. View factors approach for bifacial photovoltaic array modeling: Bifacial gain sensitivity analysis. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 2024;147.
• [37] Turkey Solar Energy Potential Atlas. Renew Energy Gen Dir 2010. http://www.yegm.gov.tr/MyCalculator/ (accessed January 7, 2020).
• [38] Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation. Development of Türkiye’s Installed Power by Years According to Primary Energy Resources (2006-2023). 2024.
• [39] Republic of Türkiye Electricity Market Regulatory Authority. April 2025 Electricity Market Sector Report. 2025.
• [40] NREL. NSRDB: National Solar Radiation Database n.d. https://nsrdb.nrel.gov/data-viewer.
• [41] Aksoy MH, Çalık MK. Performance investigation of bifacial photovoltaic panels at different ground conditions. Konya Journal of Engineering Sciences 2022;10:704–18.
• [42] Gul M, Kotak Y, Muneer T, Ivanova S. Enhancement of albedo for solar energy gain with particular emphasis on overcast skies. Energies 2018;11:2881.
• [43] Garrod A, Ghosh A. A review of bifacial solar photovoltaic applications. Frontiers in Energy Research 2023;17:704–26.
• [44] Merodio P, Martínez-Moreno F, Moretón R, Lorenzo E. Albedo measurements and energy yield estimation uncertainty for bifacial photovoltaic systems. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2023;31:1130–43.
• [45] Kazem HA, Chaichan MT, Al-Waeli AHA, Sopian K. Recent advancements in solar photovoltaic tracking systems: An in-depth review of technologies, performance metrics, and future trends. Solar Energy 2024;282:112946.