Evaluation of a CeO2 candidate material for nuclear experimental applications through thermal-hydraulic analysis with COBRA-TF in VVER-1200 reactor

Abstract

Uranium dioxide (UO₂) has long been used as the standard fuel in pressurized water reactors (PWRs) such as the VVER-1200. However, its radioactive nature, high fabrication cost, and regulatory constraints present significant challenges for experimental studies. In this work, cerium dioxide (CeO₂), a non-fissile and chemically stable ceramic, is investigated as a potential surrogate for UO₂ in thermal-hydraulic experiments. Using the COBRA-TF (CTF) subchannel analysis code, a VVER-1200 fuel assembly was modeled to simulate the thermal behavior of both UO₂ and CeO₂ under steady-state and transient conditions, including reactivity insertion and loss-of-flow accidents.

Simulation results indicate that CeO₂’s lower thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity lead to higher fuel centerline temperatures—up to 200 ℃ higher during normal operation and approximately 120 ℃ during transient events. While these elevated temperatures reflect conservative predictions, the fuel surface and cladding temperatures remain comparable to UO₂, supporting CeO₂'s suitability for experimental investigations such as cladding oxidation or material testing. Additionally, similar Critical Heat Flux Ratio (CHFR) values in both materials confirm CeO₂'s applicability in replicating coolant thermal conditions. These findings suggest that CeO₂ can serve as a viable experimental substitute to study key fuel and cladding behaviors without the complexities of handling radioactive UO₂.

Keywords

• CeO2
• VVER-1200
• COBRA-TF
• LOFA
• RIA

References

1. [1] IAEA. IAEA Safeguards Serving Nuclear Non-Proliferation, IAEA Department of Safeguards, Vienna, 2012.
2. [2] Suzuki K, Kato M, Sunaoshi T, Uno H, Carvajal-Nunez U, Nelson AT, McClellan KJ. Thermal and mechanical properties of CeO2, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, cilt 102, 2018.
3. [3] Stennett MC, Corkhill CL, Marshall LA, Hyatt NC. Preparation, characterisation and dissolution of a CeO2 analogue for UO2 nuclear fuel, Journal of Nuclear Materials, cilt Volume 432, no. Issues 1–3, pp. Pages 182-188, 2013.
4. [4] Kurt J Lesker Company. Cerium Oxide CeO2 Evaporation Process Notes, [Çevrimiçi]. Available:https://www.lesker.com/newweb/deposition_materials/deposition-materials-notes.cfm?pgid=ce2#. [Erişildi: 4 July 2025].
5. [5] US NRC. COBRA/TRAC- A Thermal-Hydraulics Code for Transient Analysis of Nuclear Reactor Vessels and Primary Coolant Systems, U.S. NRC, 1983.
6. [6] Zhao X, Wysocki A, Shirvan K, Salko R. Assessment of the Subchannel Code CTF for Single- and Two-Phase Flows, Nuclear Technology, cilt 205, pp. 338-351, 2019.
7. [7] Toth I. The VVER Code Validation Matrix and VVER Specificities, Seminar on the transfer of competence, knowledge and experience gained through CSNI activities in the field of thermal-hydraulics(THICKET2008), Pisa, Italy, 2008.
8. [8] Harding J, Marting D. A recommendation for the thermal conductivity of UO2, Journal of Nuclear Materials, pp. 223-226, 1989.

9. [9] Fink JK, Petri MC. Thermophysical Properties of Uranium Dioxide, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA, ANL/RE-97/2, Feb. 1997.
10. [10] Nelson AT, Rittman DR, White JT, Dunwoody JT, Kato M, McClellan KJ. An Evaluation of the Thermophysical Properties of Stoichiometric CeO2 in Comparison to UO2 and PuO2, Journal of the American Ceramic Society Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 97, no. 11, 2014, Available: https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.13170. [Accessed 4 July 2025].
11. [11] Asmolov V, Gusev I, Kazanskiy V, Povarov V, Statsura D. New generation first-of-the kind unit – VVER-1200 design features, Nuclear Energy and Technology, cilt Volume 3, no. Issue 4, pp. Pages 260-269, 2017.
12. [12] IAEA. Status Report-VVER-1200 (V-392), IAEA, Vienna, 2021.
13. [13] Hafez N, Shahbunder H, Amin E, Elfiki SA, Abdel-Latif A. Study on criticality and reactivity coefficients of VVER-1200 reactor, ScienceDirect, Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197020303401. [Accessed 4 July 2025]., 2021.
14. [14] Amil M, Jamil M. Fuel Performance Comparison of Uranium Nitride and Uranium Carbide in VVER-1200 using OpenMC, MATEC Web of Conferences," in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381698162_Fuel_Performance_Comparison_of_Uranium_Nitride_and_Uranium_Carbide_in_VVER-1200_using_OpenMC, 2024.
15. [15] Kim YK, Sah I, Kim ES. UO₂ Spheres Produced by External Gelation Process, Korean J. Mater.: vol. 30, no. 10, doi: 10.3740/MRSK.2020.30.10.533., Oct. 2020.
16. [16] Faghihi F, Mirvakili SM, Safaei S, Bagheri S. Neutronics and sub-channel thermal-hydraulics analysis of the Iranian VVER-1000 fuel bundle, Prog. Nucl. Energy, vol. 87, Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197015301001, 2016.
17. [17] Louis HK. Neutronic Analysis of the VVER-1200 under Normal Operating Conditions, Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics, cilt Volume: 11(3), pp. Pages: 53-66, 2021.
18. [18] EE L. Nuclear Power Reactor Safety, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1977.
19. [19] Todreas NE, Kazimi MS. Nuclear Systems, Volume 1: Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals, Second Edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York: Pp. [37-40,61,118,198,201,375,548 787-789 and 966], ISBN 978-1-4398-0888-7., 2011.
20. [20] Vitz E, Moore JW, Shorb J, Prat-Resina X, Wendorff T, Hahn A. Nuclear Power Plants," Chemical Education Digital Library (ChemEd DL). [Çevrimiçi]. Available: https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Exemplars_and_Case_Studies/Exemplars/Physics_and_Astronomy/Nuclear_Power_Plants. [Erişildi: 3 July 2025].
21. [21] Murat O, Sanchez-Espinoza V, Wang S, Stuckert J. Preliminary validation of ASTEC V2.2.b with the QUENCH-20 BWR bundle experiment, Nuclear Engineering and Design, cilt 370, no. ISSN 0029-5493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110931., 2020.
22. [22] Mercan AK, Gabrielli F, Sanchez-Espinoza VH. Validation of Astec2.1 using Quench-12 for VVER-Reactors, Nuclear Engineering and Design, cilt 395, no. 111840, ISSN 0029-5493, 2022.
23. [23] Lassmann K. TRANSURANUS: a fuel rod analysis code ready for use, Journal of Nuclear Materials, cilt Vol: 188, no. ISSN 0022-3115, pp. Pages 295-302, 1992.