Research Article

Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models

Volume: 11 Number: 1 March 17, 2026
EN

Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models

Abstract

This study investigates the short-term photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting problem using real field data and comparatively evaluates the performance of different forecasting approaches. The study utilizes active power and meteorological data from a 1 MW installed capacity PV plant located in Çanakkale province, northwest Turkey, with a 15-minute sampling interval. The dataset covers the period from August 2022 to August 2024, and only daytime data with solar irradiance above 20 W/m² were considered to minimize the negative impact of zero production on the model. Forecasting performance was analyzed for 15-minute (h = 1) and 60-minute (h = 4) forward forecasting horizons.In the comparative analysis, the persistence method was used as the basic reference model; Ridge regression, support vector regression (SVR), and LSBoost model were used as machine learning-based methods; Long-short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks were evaluated as deep learning-based methods. Additionally, a hybrid VMD+LSTM model combining Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) with an LSTM network was investigated as a current signal decomposition-based approach. The models were evaluated using RMSE, MAE, normalized RMSE (nRMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²) metrics on a dataset separated by 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% testing ratios without time-order distortion.The results showed that the persistence model offered competitive performance at a very short prediction horizon (h = 1), but the accuracy of this approach decreased significantly as the prediction horizon increased. For 60-minute forward prediction, deep learning models produced more successful results; the optimized LSTM model achieved the best performance with 9.69% nRMSE and an R² value of 0.884. In contrast, while the VMD+LSTM hybrid model produced promising results during the validation phase, it exhibited poor generalization performance on the test set. This finding reveals that decomposition-based hybrid approaches are not superior in all conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Aydın A, Dindar T, Alp E. Investigating the performance impact of solar panels; a sample application in Izmir province with the PVsyst program. International Journal of Energy Studies, 2025; 10(3): 951-962.
  2. [2] International Energy Agency (IEA). Renewables 2023: Analysis and Forecast to 2028. IEA Publications, Paris, France, 2023.
  3. [3] Lauret P, David M, Pinson P. Verification of solar irradiance probabilistic forecasts. Solar Energy 2019; 194: 254–271.
  4. [4] Mellit A, Kalogirou SA. Artificial intelligence techniques for photovoltaic applications: A review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 2008; 34: 574–632.
  5. [5] Ahmed R, Sreeram V, Mishra Y, Arif MD. A review and evaluation of the state-of-the-art in PV solar power forecasting: Techniques and optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020; 124: 109792.
  6. [6] Reikard H. Predicting solar radiation at high resolutions: A comparison of time series forecasts. Solar Energy 2009; 83: 342–349.
  7. [7] Chen C, Duan S, Cai T, Liu B. Online 24-h solar power forecasting based on weather type classification using artificial neural network. Solar Energy 2011; 85: 2856–2870.
  8. [8] Shi J, Lee WJ, Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang P. Forecasting power output of photovoltaic systems based on weather classification and support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 2012; 48: 1064–1069.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Electrical Energy Generation (Incl. Renewables, Excl. Photovoltaics), Photovoltaic Power Systems

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 17, 2026

Submission Date

January 9, 2026

Acceptance Date

January 17, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 11 Number: 1

APA
Esen, V. (2026). Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models. International Journal of Energy Studies, 11(1), 417-435. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1860168
AMA
1.Esen V. Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models. Int J Energy Studies. 2026;11(1):417-435. doi:10.58559/ijes.1860168
Chicago
Esen, Vedat. 2026. “Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Hybrid Models”. International Journal of Energy Studies 11 (1): 417-35. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1860168.
EndNote
Esen V (March 1, 2026) Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models. International Journal of Energy Studies 11 1 417–435.
IEEE
[1]V. Esen, “Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models”, Int J Energy Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 417–435, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.58559/ijes.1860168.
ISNAD
Esen, Vedat. “Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Hybrid Models”. International Journal of Energy Studies 11/1 (March 1, 2026): 417-435. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1860168.
JAMA
1.Esen V. Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models. Int J Energy Studies. 2026;11:417–435.
MLA
Esen, Vedat. “Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Hybrid Models”. International Journal of Energy Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2026, pp. 417-35, doi:10.58559/ijes.1860168.
Vancouver
1.Vedat Esen. Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting in Çanakkale, Türkiye: A comparative study of machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models. Int J Energy Studies. 2026 Mar. 1;11(1):417-35. doi:10.58559/ijes.1860168