Effect of conventional and additive manufacturing reactors on hydrogen charging process

The original article was published on December 29, 2025. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijes/article/1745480

Erratum Note

In the article titled “Effect of conventional and additive manufacturing reactors on hydrogen charging process”, published in Volume 10, Issue 4 of the International Journal of Energy Studies, a formatting problem occurred in the published version of the manuscript. During the typesetting process, some bibliographic and publication information fields in the manuscript were incorrectly rendered due to formatting issues in the source document. In particular, the page number range in the article header section was displayed incorrectly as placeholder text in the published version. The editorial office reviewed the article and corrected the header information, in accordance with the journal’s template.

Abstract

In this study, experimental studies were conducted in conventional 304 stainless steel plain reactors and AlSi10Mg reactors with a simple lattice geometry. LaNi5 was selected as the hydrogen storage material. In experiments with a conventional stainless steel reactor, LaNi5 activated after five charge-discharge cycles, while in the additively manufactured AlSi10Mg bed, the material was activated in a short time after just one charge-discharge cycle. The open-pore structure of the lattice improved fluid flow and heat transfer, increasing the overall efficiency of the metal hydride bed. As a result of the experiment, 0.64 g of hydrogen was stored in the conventional and simple lattice geometry reactors.

Keywords

• Hydrogen storage
• Metal hydride
• Reactor types

References

1. [1] Çeçen H. An examination of Greenland’s position in combating climate change within the framework of European Union law. Paradigm: Journal of Economic and Administrative Research 2024; 13 (1): 129–139.
2. [2] Abboud MR. Assessment of renewable energy use in buildings in Morocco. Master’s thesis, İstanbul Kültür University, 2023.
3. [3] Alwazeer D. Engin T. Use of molecular hydrogen in food technologies. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 2022; 10(7): 1205–1213.
4. [4] Özdemir ZÖ. Mutlubaş H. Enerji taşıyıcısı olarak hidrojen ve hidrojen üretim yöntemleri. Bartın University International Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences 2019; 2(1): 16–34.
5. [5] Mekonnin AS. Wacławiak K, Humayun M, Zhang S, Ullah H. Hydrogen storage technology, and its challenges: A review. Catalysts 2025; 15(3): 260.
6. [6] Park CS, Jung K, Jeong SU, Kang KS, Lee YH, Park YS, Park BH. Development of hydrogen storage reactor using composite of metal hydride materials with ENG. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020 45(51), 27434–27442.
7. [7] He T, Cao H, Chen P. Complex hydrides for energy storage, conversion, and utilization. Advanced Materials 2019; 31(50): 1902757.
8. [8] Liu L, Ilyushechkin A, Liang D, Cousins A, Tian W, Chen C, Yin J, Schoeman L. Metal hydride composite structures for improved heat transfer and stability for hydrogen storage and compression applications. Inorganics 2023; 11(5): 181.

9. [9] Dewangan SK, Mohan M, Kumar V, Sharma A, Ahn B. A comprehensive review of the prospects for future hydrogen storage in materials‐application and outstanding issues. International Journal of Energy Research 2022; 46(12): 16150–16177.
10. [10] MacDonald BD, Rowe AM. Impacts of external heat transfer enhancements on metal hydride storage tanks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2006; 31(12): 1721–1731.
11. [11] Chung CA, Yang S W, Yang C Y, Hsu C W, Chiu P Y. Experimental study on the hydrogen charge and discharge rates of metal hydride tanks using heat pipes to enhance heat transfer. Applied Energy 2013; 103(1): 581–587.
12. [12] Chandra S, Sharma P, Muthukumar P, Tatiparti SSV. Modeling and numerical simulation of a 5 kg LaNi5-based hydrogen storage reactor with internal conical fins. International journal of hydrogen energy 2020; 45(15): 8794-8809.
13. [13] Gkanas EI, Makridis SS, Kikkinides ES, Stubos AK. Perforation effect on a rectangular metal hydride tank for the hydriding and dehydriding process by using COMSOL Multiphysics software. 2013; 1303-4512.
14. [14] Kumar SA, Prasad RVS. Basic principles of additive manufacturing: Different additive manufacturing technologies. In: Additive Manufacturing; 2021:17-35.
15. [15] Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B, Khorasani M. Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 2021.
16. [16] Salem H, Abouchadi H, El Bikri K. Design for additive manufacturing. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 2020; 98(19): 3043–3054.
17. [17] Jiménez M, Romero L, Domínguez I A, Espinosa MDM, Domínguez, M. Additive manufacturing technologies: An overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects. Complexity ; 2019: 9656938.
18. [18] Atalmis G, Toros S, Timurkutluk B, Kaplan Y. Effect of expanded natural graphite addition and copper coating on reaction kinetics and hydrogen storage characteristics of metal hydride reactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 53(1): 647-656.