Simulation of a PV module at different set-up and operating conditions to give I-V and P-V curves

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 1 - 13, 24.03.2023

Anas Bala Jamilu Ya'u Muhammad , Kadawa Ibrahim Ali Richard Balthia Mshellia

https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1147678

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Solar energy is among the source of energy that is reliable, available and non-harmful to the society. The output of solar photovoltaic system can be improved by means of solar tracking system either mechanically or electrically. The low conversion efficiency of PV modules, which is significantly impacted by operational conditions, is the primary constraint of PV systems. The financial risk of installing a system for maximum power output is increased by improper assessment of PV module at various configurations and operating conditions and the performance of solar modules strongly depends on the temperature of the solar modules. This present work investigates the effect of temperature on PV module using Scilab XcosTM simulation software at different setups and operating conditions to give I-V and P-V curves in order to evaluate its output performance. The results of the simulations show that the voltage across the PV module at open circuit and current produced at short circuit increased with increasing the solar irradiance harnessed by the solar module from 700W/m2 to 1000W/m2 at constant temperature of 25 oC thereby increasing the maximum output power of the PV module. The results also revealed that using standard test condition (STC) parameters at different operating conditions of PV module the increment of short circuit current is more significant as open circuit voltage than current produced at short circuit.

Keywords

Crystalline silicon, Current, Insolation, Solar PV modules, Voltage

References

• [1] Grätzel M. Perspectives for dye-sensitized nano-crystalline solar cells. Progress Photovoltaic Research and Applications 2000; 8(1): 171-183.
• [2] Xue J, Uchida S, Rand BP, Forrest SR. Asymmetric tandem organic photovoltaic cells with hybrid planar-mixed molecular hetero-junctions. Applied Physics Letter 2004; 85(23): 5757.
• [3] Green MA. Third generation photovoltaic: advanced solar energy conversion. Springer, 2003.
• [4] Alsema EA. Energy pay-back time and CO2 emissions of PV systems. Progress Photovoltaic Research and Applications 2000; 8(1): 17.
• [5] Zhang X, Shen J, Xu P, Zhao X, Xu Y. Socio-economic performance of a novel solar photovoltaic/loop-heat-pipe heat pump water heating system in three different climatic regions. Energy 2014; 135: 20-34.
• [6] Natarajan S, Mallick T, Katz M, Weingaertner S. Numerical investigations of solar cell temperature for photovoltaic concentrator system with and without passive cooling arrangements. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2011; 50: 2514-2521.
• [7] Fthenakis V, Alsema E. Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and external costs: 2004-early 2005 status. Progress Photovoltaic Research and Applications 2006; 14(3): 275.
• [8] Keoleian GA., McD, Lewis G. Application of life-cycle energy analysis to photovoltaic module design. Progress Photovoltaic Research and Applications 1997; 5(4): 287.
• [9] Keshner MS, Arya R. Study of potential cost reductions resulting from super large-scale manufacturing of PV modules. NREL report NREL/SR-520-36846, 2004.
• [10] King RR. Pathways to 40% efficient concentrator photovoltaic. Proceeding of the 20th European Photovoltaic Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 2005.
• [11] Green MA, Emery K, King DL, Hishikawa Y, Warta W. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 28). Progress Photovoltaic Research and Applications 2006; 14(5): 455.
• [12] Chander S, Purohit A, Sharma A, Arvind, Nehra SP, Dhaka MS. A study on photovoltaic parameters of`monocrystalline silicon solar cell with cell temperature. Energy Reports 2015; 1: 104-109.
• [13] Dash PK, Gupta NC. Effect of Temperature on Power Output from Different Commercially available Photovoltaic Modules. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 2015; 5(1): 148-151.
• [14] Temaneh-Nyah C, Mukwekwe L. An Investigation on the Effect of Operating Temperature on Power Output of the Photovoltaic System at University of Namibia Faculty of Engineering and I.T Campus. 3rd International Conference on Digital Information, Networking, and Wireless Communications, Namibia, 2015.
• [15] Suwapaet N, Boonla P. The investigation of produced power output during high operating temperature occurrences of monocrystalline and amorphous photovoltaic modules. Energy Procedia 2014; 52: 459-465.
• [16] Shukla A, Khare M, Shukla KN. Modeling and Simulation of Solar PV Module on MATLAB/Simulink. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 2015; 4(1): 18516-18527.
• [17] Kumar MP, Debnath K, Md. Habibur R. Modeling and Simulation of a PV Module Based on Power System using MATLAB/Simulink. Dhaka University Journal of Science 2014; 62(2): 127-132.
• [18] Pradhan A, Ali SM, Jena C. Analysis of Solar PV cell Performance with Changing Irradiance and Temperature. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science 2013; 2(1): 214-220.
• [19] Mustapha I, Dikwa MK, Musa BU, Abbagana M. Performance evaluation of polycrystalline solar photovoltaic module in weather conditions of Maiduguri, Nigeria. Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and Environment 2013; 9: 69-81.
• [20] Shaari S, Sopian K, Amin N, Kassim MN. The Temperature Dependence Coefficients of Amorphous Silicon and Crystalline Photovoltaic Modules using Malaysian Field Test Investigation. American Journal of Applied Science 2009; 6(4): 586-593.