Assessment of thermal comfort preferences of industrial facility workers

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 849 - 865, 25.12.2024

İsmail Caner , Şükran Özbağ , Nadir İlten

https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1516469

Abstract

Ensuring thermal comfort in industrial facilities enhances worker productivity and well-being. Achieving optimal conditions necessitates efficient utilisation of HVAC systems. Therefore, ongoing monitoring and improvement are essential to maintain suitable thermal environments within workspaces. This study focused on evaluating the environmental conditions of a facility located in Bolu province about its workforce. Measurements and surveys were conducted to assess conditions separately during summer, winter, and spring. Evaluations considered factors such as age, gender, clothing, and activity levels of the workers. Further analysis of PMV values showed significant differences in thermal comfort, except during heating and autumn, with workers’ subjective perceptions aligning closely with their acceptance of thermal conditions. Individual preferences were especially influential, particularly outside of cooling periods. While no significant differences were found based on gender or age, activity levels significantly affected thermal comfort, highlighting the importance of considering these factors in industrial settings.

Keywords

Thermal comfort, PMV-PPD, Statistical analysis, Industrial facility

Ethical Statement

The necessary ethical approval document and permissions for the survey and measurements applied in the study were obtained from the company.

References

• [1] Omidvar A, Jungsoo K. Modification of sweat evaporative heat loss in the PMV/PPD model to improve thermal comfort prediction in warm climates. Building and Environment 2020; 176: 106868.
• [2] Wu Q, Jianhua L, Liang Z, Jiawen Z, Linlin J. Study on thermal sensation and thermal comfort in environment with moderate temperature ramps. Building and Environment 2020; 171: 106640.
• [3] ISO 7730. Ergonomics of the thermal environment-assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995.
• [4] ASHRAE-55 Standard. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. ANSI/ASHRAE, 55, 5, 2013.
• [5] Langevin J, Gurian P L, Wen J. Tracking the human-building interaction: a longitudinal field study of occupant behavior in air-conditioned offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2015; 42: 94-115.
• [6] Langevin J, Wen J, Gurian P L. Modeling thermal comfort holistically: bayesian estimation of thermal sensation, acceptability, and preference distributions for office building occupants. Building and Environment 2013; 69: 206-226.
• [7] Enescu D. A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 79: 1353-1379.
• [8] Ismail A R, Jusoh N, Nuawi M, Deros B, Makhtar N, Rahman A R. Assessment of thermal comfort at manual car body assembly workstation. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering 2009; 3: 690-694.
• [9] Altıntaş E. The evaluation of thermal comfort on the primarily school classrooms by thermal sensation scale. Msc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, 2008.
• [10] Humphreys M. Outdoor temperatures and comfort indoors. Batiment International Building Research and Practice 1978; 2: 92-92.
• [11] Yang Y, Baizhan L, Hong L, Meilan T, Runming Y. A study of adaptive thermal comfort in a well-controlled climate chamber. Applied Thermal Engineering 2015; 76: 283-291.
• [12] Cheung T, Stefano S, Thomas P, Peixian L, Gail B. Analysis of the accuracy on PMVPPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. Building and Environment 2019; 153: 205-217.
• [13] Rupp R F, Richard de D, Enedir G. Field study of mixed-mode office buildings in Southern Brazil using an adaptive thermal comfort framework. Energy and Buildings 2018; 158: 1475-1486.
• [14] Kula Kartal S, Mor Dirlik E. Historical development of the concept of validity and the most preferred technique of reliability: cronbach alpha coefficient. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education 2016; 16: 1865-1879.
• [15] Lance C E, Butts M M, Michels L C. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria what did they really say?. Organizational Research Methods 2006; 9: 202-220.
• [16] Caner İ. Optimization of heating and cooling load in hospitals in terms of thermal comfort and energy efficiency. PhD Thesis, Balikesir University, 2020.
• [17] Özbağ Ş. Thermal comfort analysis of heavy works environments in industrial facilities. Msc Thesis, Balikesir University, 2024.