EN
To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders' Reactions to Errors
Abstract
Errors are present in every organization, or structure involving people. They are inevitable in schools where school leaders, teachers, students, and parents maintain close contact. School leaders are key persons in managing errors effectively. By managing errors, they can turn them into positive consequences like learning, change at school. Error management is not about preventing errors, but about avoiding the negative consequences of errors and reducing their effects. In this regard, this study aims to reveal the views of school leaders regarding error management and strategies in schools through qualitative research administering semi-structured interviews with ten school leaders. Findings indicate that school leaders' dominant perspective on error is that it is accepted, though a few ignore or deny errors. There are individual (neglect, lack of knowledge and skill, state of well-being) and collective (lack of communication, unclear legislation, school culture) sources of errors. The findings of this study have revealed that error management strategies can be categorized before an error (detailed explanation, setting rules, sharing past errors), after an error (immediate intervention, ignorance, enforcing legislation, mediating, taking advice and warning), and in terms of both cases (communicating, tolerant school culture). The participants regard errors as learning, benefit, and change at school. The study concludes that errors can be managed easily when they are seen as a part of human nature.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
The ethics application for the study was made on 30/07/2021 and the research was carried out with the approval of Trakya University Ethics Commission dated 08/09/2021 and numbered 07/07 (E-29563864-050.04.04-117952).
References
- Abay, J. R., & Clores, M. A. (2022). Beliefs, attitudes, and practices of high school teachers in handling students’ errors: Implications for error-tolerant mathematics classrooms. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 6, 101-118.
- Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
- Akgun, A. E., Keskin, H., Aksoy, Z., Samil Fidan, S., & Yigital, S. (2023). The mediating role of organizational learning capability and resilience in the error management culture-service innovation link and the contingent effect of error frequency. The Service Industries Journal, 43(7-8), 525-554.
- Akuzum, C., ve Ozmen, F. (2013). Okul yöneticilerinin okul ortamında yaşanan örgütsel hatalara yönelik tavır alışları [Attitudes of school administrators towards organizational errors in the school environment]. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 332-351.
- Arenas, A., Briones, E., & Tabernero, C. (2023). Error orientation in a decision-making simulation program: differences between promotion vs. prevention focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1057634.
- Biggerstaff, D. L., & Thompson, A. R. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 173-183.
- Carayon, P., & Wood, K. E. (2010). Patient safety: The role of human factors and systems engineering. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 153, 23–46.
- Creswell, J. W. (2015). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods] (2. Baskı) (Çev. Edt. M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir). Siyasal Kitabevi.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Education Management
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Early Pub Date
March 25, 2025
Publication Date
May 19, 2025
Submission Date
November 30, 2024
Acceptance Date
March 20, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 1
APA
Kurum Tiryakioğlu, G. (2025). To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, 6(1), 106-123. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15075697
AMA
1.Kurum Tiryakioğlu G. To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors. IJESP. 2025;6(1):106-123. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15075697
Chicago
Kurum Tiryakioğlu, Gül. 2025. “To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 6 (1): 106-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15075697.
EndNote
Kurum Tiryakioğlu G (May 1, 2025) To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 6 1 106–123.
IEEE
[1]G. Kurum Tiryakioğlu, “To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors”, IJESP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 106–123, May 2025, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15075697.
ISNAD
Kurum Tiryakioğlu, Gül. “To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 6/1 (May 1, 2025): 106-123. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15075697.
JAMA
1.Kurum Tiryakioğlu G. To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors. IJESP. 2025;6:106–123.
MLA
Kurum Tiryakioğlu, Gül. “To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, May 2025, pp. 106-23, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15075697.
Vancouver
1.Gül Kurum Tiryakioğlu. To Accept or to Ignore: School Leaders’ Reactions to Errors. IJESP. 2025 May 1;6(1):106-23. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15075697