Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study

Nurhayat Kocatürk Kapucu; Bilal Duman; Müge Adnan

doi:10.63612/ijesp.1835329

Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study

Abstract

Digital competences represent essential skills for adapting to 21st-century conditions; encompassing the safe and critical use of information society technologies for work, daily life, and communication. Determining the digital competence levels of individuals is crucial to guide interventions aimed at enhancing these competences. This study presents the development process of a Digital Competence Scale for Faculty Members (DCS-FM), designed specifically to assess the digital competence levels of higher education instructors. The data collection process took place during the 2020–2021 academic year among faculty members working at ... University in ... province of Türkiye. Researchers collected the data themselves to ensure consistency and reliability throughout the process. As part of the validity studies, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, yielding a six-factor structure. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the six-factor structure demonstrated good model fit indices. In the process of developing the scale and conducting validity and reliability studies, data were collected from a total of 740 unique faculty members. The scale development process involved two pilot applications and one main application, with exploratory factor, confirmatory factor, and item analyses conducted throughout. Confirmatory factor analysis of the collected data yielded a 30-item scale encompassing six factors. These factors align with the European Framework for Digital Competence of Educators (known as ‘DigCompEdu’) developed by the European Commission Joint Research Centre. Based on the validity and reliability analysis results and findings, it can be concluded that the scale possesses the sufficient psychometric properties sought in the literature.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This study includes a part of the TUBITAK 1002 Project numbered 122K043.

Project Number

TÜBİTAK 1002 Project (Number: 122K043)

Ethical Statement

This research was conducted in accordance with the decision of the Mugla Sitki Koçman University Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee dated March 12, 2021, and numbered 210066/93. The authors have no personal or financial conflicts of interest related to the research discussed in this article. This study is based on a part of Nurhayat Kocatürk Kapucu's doctoral thesis prepared under the supervision of Bilal Duman and Müge Adnan.

Thanks

We would like to thank the MSKU faculty members whose opinions were consulted during the research process. We would like to thank TÜBİTAK for the project support.

References

Akkoyunlu, B., Yılmaz-Soylu, M. & Çağlar, M. (2010). Development of a “numeracy competency scale” for university students. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 39, 10-19.
Artun, H. & Günüç, S. (2016). Student perception scale for instructors’ technology integration competence: validity and reliability study. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Faculty of Education 13(1): 544-566. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yyuefd/issue/25853/272560
Aslan, S., Alanoğlu, M., & Karabatak, S. (2025). Enhancing 21st-century teaching competencies: The key role of digital literacy in connecting pre-service teachers’ TPACK. Information Development, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251315841
Baran, E., Correia, A. P., Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education. Volume 32, 3, ISSN 0158-7919.
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in digital age: guidelines for designing teaching and learning. https://openlibrary-repo.ecampusontario.ca/jspui/handle/123456789/276
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Handbook of data analysis for social sciences. 13th edn. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A. Barroso-Osuna, J. (2020). Development of the teacher digital competence validation of digcompedu check-in questionnaire in the university context of andalusia (Spain). Sustainability, 12(15) 6094 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156094
Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. & Punie, Y. (2017). Digcomp 2.1: the digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. JRC Working Papers. Joint Research Centre.

Cheetham, G. & Chivers, G.E. (2005). Professions, competence and informal learning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Child, D. (2006). The Essentials of Factor Analysis. London & New York: Continuum.
Cleveland-Innes, M. (2012). Teaching in an online community of inquiry: Faculty role adjustment in the new higher education. In Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch019
DeVellis, R.F. (2017). Scale development: theories and applications. Translated by T. Tozan. Istanbul: Nobel Publications.
Dias-Trindade, S. & Albuquerque, C. (2022). University teachers’ digital competence: a case study from Portugal. Social Sciences. 11(10), 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100481
Duman, B. (2011). Chapter 1: Basic concepts related to education and teaching. B. Duman (Ed.) Principles and methods of teaching. (4th Edition) Anı Publishing.
Elçi, A. & Vural, M. (2017). Instructor 4.0: the changing role of the instructor and technology-enriched learning. In: Mediterranean International Conference on Social Sciences (eds R Aydın and H Yıldız), Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 12-22 May 2017, pp. 494-498. Sarajevo: Dobra Knjiga.
Erkuş, A. (2014). Measurement and scale development in psychology - basic concepts and procedures. 2nd edn. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
European Commission (2022). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on a European strategy for universities. https://education.ec.europa.eu/document/commission-communication-on-a-european-strategy-for-universities
European Union. (2006). Recommendation of The European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006H0962
Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: an analysis of frameworks. Technical Report by The Joint Research Centre of The European Commission. Publications Office of The European Union. https://ifap.ru/library/book522.pdf
Gezer, B. & Sevim, Y. (2006). The effect of internet usage on the professional development of teachers working in secondary education institutions (the case of Elazığ province). Fırat University Journal of Eastern Studies, 5 (1), 79-84. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fudad/issue/47092/59236
Göktaş, Y., Yıldırım, Z., Yıldırım, S. (2008). The status of information and communication technologies in education faculties: deans' views. Education and Science, 33, 149.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. Anderson, R. and Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. 6th Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kampylis, P., Punie, Y. & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting effective digital-age learning: a European framework for digitally-competent educational organisations. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC98209/jrc98209_r_digcomporg_final.pdf
Karakaya-Özyer, K. (2021). Scale development and reliability analyses: jamovi practice. Turkish Academic Research Review 6(5): 1330-1384. https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.1004560
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3rd Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Laanpere, M. (2019). Recommendations on assessment tools for monitoring digital literacy within UNESCO’s digital literacy global framework. UNESCO Information Paper 56 (UIS/2019/LO/IP/56). Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366740
Leech, N.L., Barrett, K.C. & Morgan, G.A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mora-Cantallops, M., Inamorato Dos Santos, A., Villalonga-Gómez, C. et al. (2022). The digital competence of academics in Spain: a study based on the European frameworks DigCompEdu and OpenEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/541915
Nişancı, M. (2005). E-learning at higher education: A roadmap for Turkish higher education institutions in their efforts to offer online courses (PhD Thesis No:167458) YÖK National Thesis Center.
Özdamar, K. (2013). Statistical data analysis with package programmes: MINITAB 16-IBM SPSS 21. Eskişehir: Nisan Publishing.
Pallant, J. (2015). SPSS Survival manual. Open University Press.
Redecker, C. & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. EUR 28775 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/159770
Saracaloğlu, A.S. & Günay, G. (2020). Chapter 1: History and Future Outlook of Higher Education. Panorama of Higher Education in Türkiye. Nobel Academic Publishing.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online. 8(2): 23-74.
Schumacker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Seçer, G. (2015) Psychological test development and adaptation process. Ankara: Anı Publication.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Fourth edn. Boston: Ally and Bacon.
Timur, B., Timur, S. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2014). Determining the numerical competency levels of teacher candidates. Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 33, 41-59.
Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023). The HeDiCom framework: Higher education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5
Yazon, A. D., Ang-Manaig, K., Buama, C. A. C., Tesoro, J. F. B., (2019). Digital Literacy, Digital Competence and Research Productivity of Educators. Universal Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 1734 - 1743. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070812.
Yorgancı, O.K. & Baş, B. (2022) Digital technological competencies of lecturers teaching Turkish as a foreign language. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 14(4): 1125-1136. https://iojes.net/?mod=makale_tr_ozet&makale_id=64622

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Scale Development, Instructional Technologies, Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Nurhayat Kocatürk Kapucu ^*
0000-0002-6872-6612
Türkiye

Bilal Duman
0000-0002-1282-8425
Türkiye

Müge Adnan
0000-0003-3256-7418
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

February 26, 2026

Publication Date

February 26, 2026

Submission Date

December 3, 2025

Acceptance Date

January 26, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 7 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1835329

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA84DT36EA

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kocatürk Kapucu, N., Duman, B., & Adnan, M. (2026). Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, 7(2), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1835329

AMA

1.Kocatürk Kapucu N, Duman B, Adnan M. Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study. IJESP. 2026;7(2):103-119. doi:10.63612/ijesp.1835329

Chicago

Kocatürk Kapucu, Nurhayat, Bilal Duman, and Müge Adnan. 2026. “Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 7 (2): 103-19. https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1835329.

EndNote

Kocatürk Kapucu N, Duman B, Adnan M (May 1, 2026) Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 7 2 103–119.

IEEE

[1]N. Kocatürk Kapucu, B. Duman, and M. Adnan, “Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study”, IJESP, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 103–119, May 2026, doi: 10.63612/ijesp.1835329.

ISNAD

Kocatürk Kapucu, Nurhayat - Duman, Bilal - Adnan, Müge. “Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 7/2 (May 1, 2026): 103-119. https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1835329.

JAMA

1.Kocatürk Kapucu N, Duman B, Adnan M. Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study. IJESP. 2026;7:103–119.

MLA

Kocatürk Kapucu, Nurhayat, et al. “Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, vol. 7, no. 2, May 2026, pp. 103-19, doi:10.63612/ijesp.1835329.

Vancouver

1.Nurhayat Kocatürk Kapucu, Bilal Duman, Müge Adnan. Measuring the Digital Competency Levels of Faculty Members: A Scale Development Study. IJESP. 2026 May 1;7(2):103-19. doi:10.63612/ijesp.1835329