Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers

Ayşegül Atalay

doi:10.63612/ijesp.1903180

Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers

Abstract

School principals are formally positioned as key organizational actors responsible for instructional leadership, administrative coordination, and relational governance. However, increasing accountability pressures combined with constrained decision-making authority have transformed the nature of their work. This qualitative study examines how professional neglect is experienced and constructed within contemporary school leadership contexts. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with nine principals representing primary, middle, and secondary schools, the study employs thematic analysis to explore how responsibility, authority, and emotional demands intersect in everyday leadership practice. The findings reveal three interrelated themes: (1) expanding responsibilities under structural constraints, (2) the paradoxical enactment of distributed leadership without substantive authority redistribution, and (3) emotional labour accompanied by professional loneliness. Participants described being held accountable for school outcomes while operating within centralized policy frameworks that limited autonomous decision-making. Delegation practices frequently involved task transfer without power redistribution, producing administrative bottlenecks rather than genuinely shared leadership. This paradox highlights a key critique of distributed leadership rhetoric: leadership may be formally dispersed while responsibility and risk remain concentrated in the principalship. These structural conditions intensified emotional labour, reinforced isolation, and undermined professional well-being. The study argues that principals’ experiences of neglect should not be reduced to individual coping limitations but understood as structurally embedded conditions shaped by organizational design and policy regimes. By conceptualizing professional neglect as a form of authority deprivation within accountability-driven systems, the study contributes to distributed leadership and school governance scholarship. The findings underscore the need for integrated leadership support frameworks that align responsibility with decision-making authority and address the emotional dimensions of leadership in systemic ways.

Keywords

References

Arnold, B., Rahimi, M., & Riley, P. (2025). The mental health of leaders in Australian government schools: Stress and burnout over a decade (2011–2020). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(6), 1502-1520. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231209713
Bailey, L., & Gibson, M. T. (2020). International school principals: Routes to headship and key challenges of their role. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 1007-1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219884686
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). Emotional reframing as a mediator of the relationships between transformational school leadership and teachers’ motivation and commitment. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 450-468.
Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, D., Han, P., Yu, C., & Liu, Y. (2025). Perceptions of the school climate’s effect on teacher burnout: The mediating roles of loneliness and emotional labor strategies. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10139-0
Cook, S. (2020). Put your big girl knickers on! The experiences of two female leaders in New Zealand primary schools turning schools around. Frontiers in Education 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00078

Coşkun, B., Katıtaş, S., & Eriçok, B. (2025). Emotional labor, job-related stress, and burnout in school leadership: insights from educational administrators. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02987-4
Crawford, M. (2009). An emotional journey. In Getting to the heart of leadership: Emotion and educational leadership. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220924.n1
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2013). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. Routledge.
Dor-Haim, P. (2022). Educational leaders' coping with loneliness: the unique perspective of school principals and vice-principals. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(3), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-11-2021-0068
Dor-Haim, P., & Oplatka, I. (2021). The implications of loneliness among school principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2020-0564
Drago-Severson, E., Maslin-Ostrowski, P., & Blum-Destefano, J. (2018). Looking behind the curtain: Principals' internal experiences of managing pressing challenges. Journal of School Leadership, 28(3), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461802800303
Edvik, A., & Muhonen, T. (2022). A work environment blind spot: Exploring school principals’ organisational and social work environments. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 26(4), 47-71.
Fullan, M. (2023). The principal 2.0: Three keys to maximizing impact. John Wiley & Sons.
Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13510020
Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5(3), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715009337770
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough?. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
Hirschman, A. O. (1972). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 728-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11402065
Jacobsen, A. J., & Buch, A. (2016). Management of professionals in school practices. Professions and Professionalism, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.1503
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Li, J. (2025). The dual principal leadership structure in international schools’ management: a study based on two schools in Mainland China. Frontiers in Education. 10:1683084. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1683084
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. (Vol75). Sage.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout. In Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior (pp. 351-357). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800951-2.00044-3
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
Ndlovu, N. (2023). Navigating Unchartered Waters: Lived Experiences of Novice Principals Leading in Deprived School Contexts (Doctoral Thesis of philosophy educational leadership, management, and policy). School of Education: College of Humanities University of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa https://hdl.handle.net/10413/22984
OECD. (2020). School leadership and policy reforms. OECD Publishing.
Oplatka, I. (2017). Principal workload: Components, determinants and coping strategies in an era of standardization and accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 552-568. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0071
Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving School Leadership, Volume 1: Policy and Practice. OECD Publishing.
Pretorius, A., & Plaatjies, B. O. B. (2023). Self-Awareness as a key emotional intelligent skill for secondary school principals’ leadership toolkit. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 5(2), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2023.9
Salo, P., Saarukka, S. (2024). In quest of principalship. In: Ahtiainen, R., Hanhimäki, E., Leinonen, J., Risku, M.,
Smeds-Nylund, AS. (Eds) Leadership in Educational Contexts in Finland. Educational Governance Research, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37604-7_3
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Rethinking schooling (pp. 208-242). Routledge.
Wang, F., Pollock, K. E., & Hauseman, C. (2018). School principals’ job satisfaction: The effects of work intensification. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration And Policy. 185, 73-90.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Education Management

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ayşegül Atalay ^*
0000-0003-3079-801X
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

April 30, 2026

Publication Date

May 12, 2026

Submission Date

March 5, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 30, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 7 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1903180

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA36CT84RR

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Atalay, A. (2026). Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, 7(2), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1903180

AMA

1.Atalay A. Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers. IJESP. 2026;7(2):269-288. doi:10.63612/ijesp.1903180

Chicago

Atalay, Ayşegül. 2026. “Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 7 (2): 269-88. https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1903180.

EndNote

Atalay A (May 1, 2026) Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 7 2 269–288.

IEEE

[1]A. Atalay, “Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers”, IJESP, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 269–288, May 2026, doi: 10.63612/ijesp.1903180.

ISNAD

Atalay, Ayşegül. “Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy 7/2 (May 1, 2026): 269-288. https://doi.org/10.63612/ijesp.1903180.

JAMA

1.Atalay A. Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers. IJESP. 2026;7:269–288.

MLA

Atalay, Ayşegül. “Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers”. International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, vol. 7, no. 2, May 2026, pp. 269-88, doi:10.63612/ijesp.1903180.

Vancouver

1.Ayşegül Atalay. Solo at The Helm: Neglected School Managers. IJESP. 2026 May 1;7(2):269-88. doi:10.63612/ijesp.1903180