Proposed Framework for Daylight-Focused Homes during Design Development

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 77 - 82, 30.06.2023

Semih Göksel Yıldırım , Stuart Baur , Thomas G. Yarbrough Matthew Nıeters

https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.1261335

https://izlik.org/JA83HM87LR

Abstract

Solar decathlon is held biannually, and participant universities have a unique chance to locate solar houses on campus as a living lab after the contest. A variety of performance criteria are evaluated during the contest and daylighting is one among them. Complicated analysis tools, design solutions, and their effectiveness are major challenges during the design development of new solar houses. This challenge definition leads to developing a daylighting guideline for new solar house design. To provide a roadmap of validity of emerging daylighting metrics, demonstration of the daylighting performance of built-up solar houses, and daylighting guideline for design parameters with recent technology on new solar house design are the specific objectives of this study. The manuscript aims to examine the existing daylighting design tools while proposing a roadmap for how to use emerging metrics over solar house design. Three solar decathlon entries of a Midwest Public University are selected for post-occupancy evaluation to verify selected design tools. After analyze method, tools and final products are introduced which can be used on case studies, impact on research and education is discussed in the paper. Experiential method proposal for daylighting design have three phases and these are; the daylight metrics, the daylight performance and impact on research and education. It would be beneficial in the future to have this as a design guide, especially for any residential buildings rather than just solar houses.

Keywords

solar house , daylighting , design tools , performance measurement

Proposed Framework for Daylight-Focused Homes during Design Development

https://izlik.org/JA83HM87LR

Abstract

Solar decathlon is held biannually, and participant universities have a unique chance to locate solar houses on campus as a living lab after the contest. A variety of performance criteria are evaluated during the contest and daylighting is one among them. Complicated analysis tools, design solutions, and their effectiveness are major challenges during the design development of new solar houses. This challenge definition leads to developing a daylighting guideline for new solar house design. To provide a roadmap of validity of emerging daylighting metrics, demonstration of the daylighting performance of built-up solar houses, and daylighting guideline for design parameters with recent technology on new solar house design are the specific objectives of this study. The manuscript aims to examine the existing daylighting design tools while proposing a roadmap for how to use emerging metrics over solar house design. Three solar decathlon entries of Missouri University of Science and Technology are selected for post-occupancy evaluation to verify selected design tools. After analyze method, tools and final products are introduced which can be used on case studies, impact on research and education is discussed in the paper. Experiential method proposal for daylighting design have three phases and these are; the daylight metrics, the daylight performance and impact on research and education. It would be beneficial in the future to have this as a design guide, especially for any residential buildings rather than just solar houses.

Keywords

Solar house , daylighting , design tools , performance measurement

References

• Osser, R. E., Andersen, M., Norford, L., (2007). Development of two heliodon systems and recommendations for their use. Proceeding of Solar 2007; sustainable energy puts America work. Cleveland, July 7-12, 2007. [Online] Available: https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/153684
• Wimmers, G., (2009). Passive design toolkit for homes. Light House Sustainable Building Centre, Vancouver. [Online] Available: http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/passive-home-design.pdf
• Reinhart, C. F., Weissman, D. A., (2012). The daylit area: Correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics. Journal of Building and environment, 50 (2012), pp.155-164. Published by Elsevier. [Online] Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132311003817
• Zaikina, V., (2016). Light modelling in architectural spaces; luminance-based metrics of contour, shape and detail distinctness of day-lit 3D objects. PhD Dissertation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art, Department of Architectural Design, Form and Colour Studies. [Online] Available: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2391667
• LEED, (2009). LEED reference guide for green interior design and construction. US. Green Building Council (USGBC). [Online] Available: http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs9377.pdf
• Skripac, B., (2011). BIM for advanced daylighting analysis. Autodesk University. [Online] Available: https://sustainabilityworkshop.autodesk.com/sites/default/files/core-page-files/bimforadvanceddaylighting_skripac_au2011.pdf
• Heschong Mahone Group (HMG), (1999). Daylighting in schools; an investigation into the relationship between daylighting and human performance. Pacific Gas and Electric Company. [Online] Available: http://h-m-g.com/downloads/Daylighting/schoolc.pdf
• Reinhart, C. F, (2014). Daylighting handbook I; fundamentals designing with the sun. Published in USA.
• Boubekri, M., (2008). Daylighting, architecture and health; building design strategies. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
• Boubekri, M., (2014). Daylighting design: planning strategies and best practice solutions. Published by Birkhauser Verlag GmbH.
• Strong, D., (2014). Health, happiness, wellbeing & daylight. 3rd Annual GHA Conference, London. [Online] Available: http://www.goodhomes.org.uk/down-loads/events/David%20Strong.pdf
• Ander, G. D., (2003). Daylighting performance and design. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2nd edition, 2003, New Jersey.
• Horvat, M., Wall, M., (2012). Solar design of buildings for architects: Review of solar design tools. Solar Heating & Cooling Programme, International Energy Agency. [Online] Available: http://www.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/publications/T41B3_approved-Jul12.pdf
• Reinhart, C. F., Wienold, J., (2011). The daylighting dashboard: A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Journal of Building and environment, 46 (2011), No.2, pp.386-396. Published by Elsevier. [Online] Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132310002441
• IES, (2012). Approved method: spatial daylight autonomy (sDA), annual sunlight exposure (ASE). Illuminating engineering society (IES). New York.
• Mardaljevic, J., Nabil, A., (2006). The useful daylight illuminance paradigm: a replacement for daylight factors. Energy and Buildings, 38 (7), pp. 905-913. [Online] Available: http://www.climate-based-daylighting.com/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=academic:mardaljevic_udi_lux2005.pdf
• U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon [Online] Available: http://www.solardecathlon.gov/