Performans Ölçümü Yoluyla Günışığı Aydınlatma Dersinde Deneyimsel Öğrenme

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, günışığı tasarımı için performans ölçümleri üzerine yapılan araştırma çalışmalarını eğitime uyarlamaktır. Bir Orta Batı Üniversitesi'nde deneysel bir ders açılmış ve müfredat geleneksel öğrenme ortamının yanında aktif öğrenmeyi de içerecek şekilde geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmada şematik tasarım ve tasarım geliştirme aşamalarında kullanılan parametreler sunulmuş, müfredat konuları ve uygulama deneyimleri açıklanmıştır. Özellikle performans ölçümleri ders ödevleri ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Müfredat sonuçları ödev sonuçları ile niteliksel, anketler ile niceliksel olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Güncel ve gelişmekte olan ölçümler laboratuvar ödevlerine dahil edilmiştir ve ders değerlendirmelerinin sonuçları, günışığı teknolojisindeki gelişmekte olan ölçümlerin ve pratik deneyimin katılımcılar üzerinde çekiciliği olduğunu göstermektedir. İki örnek dersin değerlendirilmesi sonucunda, lisans ve lisansüstü düzeyde verilebilecek derslere ilişkin farklılıklar ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu farklılıklar geleneksel ders öğrenme ortamları ve deneyimsel öğrenme ortamları olarak gruplandırılmıştır. Ders müfredatlarının öğrenme çıktıları, lisans mezuniyetini hedefleyen öğrenci için tasarım uygulayıcısı düzeyinde, yüksek lisans düzeyini hedefleyen öğrenci için ise araştırma topluluğu düzeyinde teknik iletişim kurma bilgi ve becerisinin kazandırılması olarak özetlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Günışığı
• performans ölçümü
• deneyimsel öğrenme
• ders müfredatı

Experiential Learning in Daylighting Course through Performance Measurements

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to adapt research studies on performance measurements for daylighting design to education. An experimental course has been introduced in Missouri University of Science and Technology, and the curriculum was developed by including active learning beside the traditional learning environment. The parameters used in the schematic design and design development stages are presented, and the curriculum topics and practical experience are explained in the study. Particularly performance measurements are associated with course assignments. Curriculum results are evaluated qualitatively with assignment results and quantitatively with surveys. Current and emerging metrics are included in lab assignments and results of course assessments show that emerging metrics in daylighting technology and practical experience had attraction over participants. As a result of the evaluation of two sample courses, differences emerge regarding the courses that can be given at undergraduate and graduate levels. These differences are grouped into traditional lecture learning environments and experiential learning environments. The learning outcomes of the course curricula are summarized as gaining the knowledge and skills to communicate technically at the level of design practitioner for the student aiming for undergraduate graduation and at the level of the research community for the student aiming for graduate level.

Keywords

• Daylighting
• Performance measurement
• Experiential learning
• Course curricula

References

1. [1] Zaikina, V., (2016). Light modelling in architectural spaces; luminance-based metrics of contour, shape and detail distinctness of day-lit 3D objects. PhD Dissertation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art, Department of Architectural Design, Form and Colour Studies.
2. [2] Wimmers, G., (2009). Passive design toolkit for homes. Light House Sustainable Building Centre, Vancouver. [Online] Available: http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/passive-home-design.pdf
3. [3] Reinhart, C. F., Weissman, D. A., (2012). The daylit area: Correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics. Journal of Building and environment, 50 (2012), pp.155-164. Published by Elsevier.
4. [4] Reinhart, C. F, (2014). Daylighting handbook I; fundamentals designing with the sun. Published in USA.
5. [5] Osser, R. E., (2007). Development of two heliodon systems at MIT and recommendations for their use. Master of Science Thesis in Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6. [6] Horvat, M., Wall, M., (2012). Solar design of buildings for architects: Review of solar design tools. Solar Heating & Cooling Programme, International Energy Agency. [Online] Available: http://www.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/publications/T41B3_approved-Jul12.pdf
7. [7] Wymelenberg, K. V. D, Inanici M. (2014). A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. LEUKOS. 2014; 10:145–164.
8. [8] Solar radiation as external thermal force acting on the building. [Online] Available: http://www.cpas-egypt.com/pdf/ Ahmed_Safwat/M.Sc/004%20%20%20%20%20 CHAPTER2.pdf

9. [9] Prinsloo, G., Dobson, R., (2015). Solar tracking. Published by Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
10. [10] Solar position calculator. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL). [Online] Available: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/solcalc/azel.html
11. [11] Oh, J. K. W., Haberl, J. S., Degelman, L., (2000). Enhanced software for displaying orthographic, stereographic, gnomic and cylindrical projections of the sun path diagram and shading mask protractor. Proceeding of the twelfth symposium on improving building systems in hot and humid climates, San Antonio, TX.
12. [12] Heavenly mathematics & cultural astronomy. [Online] Available:http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/teaching /heavenly.html
13. [13] Reinhart, C. F., Wienold, J., (2011). The daylighting dashboard: A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Journal of Building and environment, 46 (2011), No.2, pp.386-396. Published by Elsevier.
14. [14] Nedhal, A-T., Syed, F. S. F., Adel, A., (2016). Relationship between window-to-floor area ratio and single-point daylight factor in varied residential rooms in Malaysia. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9(33), Sept. 2016.
15. [15] Meek, C. M., Wymelenberg, K. V. D., (2014). Daylighting and integrated lighting design. Pocket architecture: technical design series 2014; published by Routledge.
16. [16] Boubekri, M., (2014). Daylighting design: planning strategies and best practice solutions. Published by Birkhauser Verlag GmbH.
17. [17] Pasific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), 2010. SunPath Software. [Online] Available: http://www.pge.com/myhome/edusafety/workshopstraining/pec/toolbox/tll/sunpath.shtml
18. [18] Pilkington, (2001). The Pilkington sun angle calculator. [Online] Available: http://www.pilkington.com/north-america/usa/english/building+products/tools+and+calculators/sun+angle+calculator.htm
19. [19] Grynning, S., Time, B., Matusiak, B., (2014). Solar shading control strategies in cold climates – Heating, cooling demand and daylight availability in office spaces. Journal of Solar Energy, Vol. 107, pp. 182-194. Published by Elsevier.
20. [20] Kota, K., Haberl, J. S., Clayton, M. J., Yan, W., (2014). Building Information Modeling (BIM)-based daylighting simulation and analysis. Journal of Energy and Buildings, Vol. 81, pp. 391-403. [21] Velux, (2016). Velux daylight visualizer. [Online] Available: http://www.velux.com/article/2016/daylight-visualizer
21. [22] Kumaragurubaran, V., (2012). High dynamic range image processing toolkit for lighting simulations and analysis. Master of Science Thesis, University of Washington.
22. [23] LEED, (2009). LEED reference guide for green interior design and construction. US. Green Building Council (USGBC). [Online] Available: http://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs9377.pdf
23. [24] Stein, B., McGee, J., Campbell, J (2013). The (false) color world - there’s more to the world than meets the eye…Educational resources, AmericaView. [Online] Available: https://americaview.org/program-areas/education/education-resource-portal-single-post/?custom_postID=879
24. [25] Compagnon, R., (1997). Radiance: a simulation tool for daylighting systems. The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies University of Cambridge Department of Architecture, UK. [Online] Available: http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/refer/rc97tut.pdf
25. [26] Inanici, M., Galvin, J., (2004). Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance mapping technique. Lighting Research Group, Building Technologies Department Environmental Energy Technologies Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. [Online] Available: https://eetd.lbl.gov/node/51237
26. [27] Kontogianni, G., Stathopoulou, E. K., Georgopoulos, A., Doulamis, A., (2015). HDR imaging for feature detection on detailed architectural scenes. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-5/W4, 2015 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures, 25-27 February 2015, Spain.
27. [28] Ntregkaa, A., Georgopoulosa, A., Santana Quinterob, M., (2013). Photogrammetric exploitation of HDR images for cultural heritage. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume II-5/W1, 2013 XXIV International CIPA Symposium, 2 – 6 September 2013, Strasbourg, France.
28. [29] Au, P., Donn, M., (2012). HDR luminance measurement: comparing real and simulated data. The architectural science association (ASA), Conference, 2012, New Zealand.
29. [30] Beltran, L., Mogo, B. M., (2005). Assessment of luminance distribution using hdr photography. ISES solar world congress, Orlando, FL, August 7-12, 2005.
30. [31] Rowlands, S., (2010). Ohanaware’s guide to HDR Photography. [Online] Available: http://www.ohanaware.com/hdrtist/CompleteHDRGuide2010.pdf
31. [32] Cameras versus the human eye. [Online] Available: http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/cameras-vs-human-eye.htm
32. [33] Wilson, D. HDR Photography. [Online] Available: http://www.davewilsonphotography.com/tutorials/
33. [34] Light and photography: exposure and tonal range considerations. [Online] Available: https://photography.tutsplus.com/articles/light-photography-exposure-and-tonal-range-considerations--photo-5685
34. [35] Chai, H., (2013). High dynamic range photogrammetry for light and geometry measurement. ASCE Architectural Engineering (AEI) Conference 2013.
35. [36] Horvat, M., Dubois, M., C., Snow, M., & Wall, M. (2011). International survey about digital tools used by architects for solar design. Report T.41.B.2. IEA SHC Programme Task 41: Solar Energy and Architecture.
36. [37] Cheung, K. P., Chung, S. L., (2002). A tabletop heliodon with a moving light source for use in an architect’s office. International Journal on Architectural Science, Volume 3, Number 2, p.51-60, 2002.
37. [38] Dolan, D., Bucher, G., Carter, L., Hamilton, J., Hubilla, R., (2015). Cal Poly heliodon. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California. [Online] Available: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1281&context=mesp
38. [39] LI-Cor, (2012). Photometric illuminance sensor. LI-Cor Environmental Division. [Online] Available: http://www.licor.com/env/pdf/light/210.pdf
39. [40] Lechner, N. A Guide for making and using demonstration models for heliodons. Auburn University. [Online] Available: http://www.auburn.edu/~lechnnm/heliodon/model%20manual.pdf
40. [41] Horus, (2011). Horus sundial user guide. [Online] Available: http://www.horussundials.com/dial.html
41. [42] Shadows. How to create and use a sundial. [Online] Available: http://www.shadowspro.com/en/index.html