Beyond Functionality: Morphological Design Tools for Users’ Satisfaction in Housing

Abstract

Various factors can affect an individual’s satisfaction level. While studying residential satisfaction and assessing it, subjective perceptions have the most significant influence. An essential element in ensuring satisfaction in housing is to consider the design of spaces that cater to individuals’ specific desires and needs that change over time. Housing was frequently constructed considering the specific subjective needs of individuals, before the era of industrialization. As industrialization rises, housing gradually transformed into a commodity. Certain researchers propose that studying traditional built environments and harnessing the data gained from such analyses can be advantageous for contemporary housing production. Notably, Habraken is a prominent researcher who sought to ensure users’ satisfaction in housing by devising the “Support System” rooted in his analysis of Dutch houses. Traditional house plans in Türkiye exhibit resemblances to the morphological arrangements observed by Habraken in Dutch houses, yet with some distinctive characteristics. In modern times, designers often prioritize function as the primary consideration. However, there have been attempts, such as Habraken’s, to shift towards prioritizing morphology instead. This paper will explain links between users’ satisfaction and their ability to change their immediate environments through morphologies that accommodate diverse functions.

Keywords

• sectors
• potentiality
• users' satisfaction in housing
• traditional houses in Türkiye
• morphology

Abstract

Various factors can affect an individual’s satisfaction level. While studying residential satisfaction and assessing it, subjective perceptions have the most significant influence. An essential element in ensuring satisfaction in housing is to consider the design of spaces that cater to individuals’ specific desires and needs that change over time. Housing was frequently constructed considering the specific subjective needs of individuals, before the era of industrialization. As industrialization rises, housing gradually transformed into a commodity. Certain researchers propose that studying traditional built environments and harnessing the data gained from such analyses can be advantageous for contemporary housing production. Notably, Habraken is a prominent researcher who sought to ensure users’ satisfaction in housing by devising the “Support System” rooted in his analysis of Dutch houses. Traditional house plans in Türkiye exhibit resemblances to the morphological arrangements observed by Habraken in Dutch houses, yet with some distinctive characteristics. In modern times, designers often prioritize function as the primary consideration. However, there have been attempts, such as Habraken’s, to shift towards prioritizing morphology instead. This paper will explain links between users’ satisfaction and their ability to change their immediate environments through morphologies that accommodate diverse functions.

Keywords

• Sectors
• Potentiality
• Users’ Satisfaction in Housing
• Traditional Houses in Türkiye
• Morphology

References

1. [1] E. Diener, “Subjective well-being”, Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 95 No:3, pp. 542–575.
2. [2] A. Petruccioli, “Vernacular architecture and typology”, A|Z ITU Journal of The Faculty of Architecture, 13(1), pp. 5–13. doi: 10.5505/itujfa.2016.60252.
3. [3] L. Sousa, S. Lyubomirsky, “Life satisfaction”, Worell, J. (Ed.), Encylopedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact of society on gender. Vol: 2, pp. 667-676.
4. [4] S. Weidemann, J. R. Anderson, “A Conceptual Framework for Residential Satisfaction”, Altman, I. and Werner, C.M. (Ed.), Home Environments (Human Behavior and Environment), Plenum Press, New York and London, pp. 153-182, 1985.
5. [5] C. Aigbavboa, W. Thwala, Residential Satisfaction and Housing Policy Evolution, Taylor & Francis Group, London: Routledge, 2018.
6. [6] S. Anderson, On Streets: Streets as Elements of Urban Structure, The MIT Press, 1986.
7. [7] N. J. Habraken, Variations: The Systematic Design of Supports, Laboratory of Architecture and Planning at MIT, Cambridge, Mass, 1976.
8. [8] D. Kuban, Türk Ev Geleneği Üzerine Gözlemler, Türk ve İslâm Sanatı Üzerine Denemeler, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları. İstanbul, 1982.

9. [9] Ö. Küçükerman, Kendi Mekanının Arayışı İçinde Türk Evi-Turkish House in Search of Spatial Identity, TTOK. İstanbul, 1985.
10. [10] S.H Kendall, J. R. Dale (Eds.), The Short Works of John Habraken: Ways of Seeing / Ways of Doing (1st ed.). Routledge, 2023, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003011385
11. [11] J. Akbar, “Accretion of Decisions: A Design Strategy”, Theories and Principles of Design in the Architecture of Islamic Societies, Proceedings of a Symposium held at Harvard U. and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, edited by M. B. Sevcenko; Cambridge, Mass., 1988, pp. 107-114.
12. [12] C. Balestra, J. Sultan, “Home Sweet Home: The Determinants of Residential Satisfaction and its Relation with Well-being”, OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2013/05, OECD Publishing, Paris.
13. [13] N. J. Beutell, “Life Satisfaction in Relation to Work and Family”, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259486067_Life_Satisfaction_in_Relation_to_Work_and_Family, 2006 (accessed 16 April 2023)
14. [14] N. J. Habraken, “Tools of The Trade, Thematic Aspects of Designing”, available at: https://www.habraken.com/html/downloads/tools_of_the_trade_final.pdf, 1996 (accessed 16 April 2023)
15. [15] R. Veenhoven, “Satisfaction and social position: within nation differences compared across nations”, available at: https://personal.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub1990s/96g-full.pdf, 1996 (accessed 16 April 2023).