GIS-Based Estimation of Corrected Standard Penetration Number Using the Best Semi-Variogram Model for Naogaon Sadar

Abstract

The objective of this study is to calculate the corrected standard penetration number (SPT-Nc) and generate SPT-Nc thematic maps using the best-fitting semi-variogram model. The study is based on 79 standard penetration tests (SPTs) carried out at five SPT measurements per test on each borehole, at depths of 3 m, 6 m, 9 m, 12 m, and ~15 m from the ground surface. A number of factors, such as density, GW table, and overburden pressure, in addition to other correction factors, were introduced to obtain SPT-Nc values. The SPT-Nc at each depth was then computed with Microsoft Excel. Maps obtained as a result of this procedure were subjected to GIS-based thematic maps; for each map a different color was used to indicate the value of SPT-Nc. Maps were generated using ordinary kriging interpolation and tested with six semi-variogram models to find the best-fitting model. Among the six models, the stable, k-bessel and Gaussian semi-variogram models were selected for having the least nugget-to-sill ratio. Since underground consists of clay soil at shallow depths, SPT-Nc was less than 24 and 32 at 3 m and 6 m, respectively. At a depth of 9 m, SPT-Nc ranged from 21 to 35, covering 70.23% of the area measured. At a depth of 12 m, SPT-Nc reached a maximum of 47 due to the decrease in clay content. The greatest values were recorded at 15 m, with 82.6% of the area with SPT-Nc between 38 and 51.

Keywords

• GIS
• Standard Penetration Number
• Semi-Variogram Model
• Naogaon Sadar

References

1. [1] Baker, R. (1984). Modeling soil variability as a random field. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 16(5), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01886325
2. [2] ASTM D1586. (2011). Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT) and split-barrel sampling of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
3. [3] Decourt, L. (1989). The standard penetration test, state-of-the-art report. Proc. 12th ICSMFE, Rio De Janeiro, 4, 2405-2416.
4. [4] Liao, S. S., & Whitman, R. V. (1986). Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 112(3), 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(373)
5. [5] Ghafghazi, M., DeJong, J. T., Sturm, A. P., & Temple, C. E. (2017). Instrumented Becker penetration test. II: iBPT-SPT correlation for characterization and liquefaction assessment of gravelly soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 143(9), 04017063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001718
6. [6] Rahman, M. M., Hossain, M. B., & Roknuzzaman, M. (2023, April). Effect of peak ground acceleration (PGA) on liquefaction behavior of subsoil: A case study of Dinajpur Sadar Upazila, Bangladesh. In American Institute of Physics Conference Series (Vol. 2713, No. 1, p. 030002). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0129770
7. [7] Hossain, M. B., Roknuzzaman, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2022). Liquefaction potential evaluation by deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(7), 1459-1481. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-07-010
8. [8] Rahman, M. M., Thakur, S., Ahmed, S. T., & Yasmin, R. (2025). GIS-based development of liquefaction hazard and soil distribution maps for Dinajpur Sadar, Bangladesh. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 11(2), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1662672

9. [9] Rahman, M. M. (2025). GIS based allowable bearing capacity thematic maps of shallow foundation for Bogura District, Bangladesh. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 10(3), 329-338. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1589939
10. [10] Rahman, M. M., & Sarder, M. (2026). GIS-based semi-variogram model selection for the preparation of Modified Mercalli Intensity map of Dinajpur Sadar, Bangladesh. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 11(1), 136-148. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1656666
11. [11] Hossain, M. B., & Rahman, M. M. (2025). Seismic microzonation and probability of ground failure assessment caused by liquefaction for Bogura District, Bangladesh. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 13(2), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2024.34111.2086
12. [12] Rahman, M. M., Nuhash, M. M. R., & Ray, S. (2025, December). Effect of Land Use/land Cover (LULC) Changes on Land Surface Temperature for Chuadanga, Bangladesh. In Proceedings of International Conference on Civil Engineering Research & Innovations (Vol. 12, p. 14).
13. [13] Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.B., Islam, M.A., & Rahaman, M.S. (2024). Evaluation of Ground Failure Probability Caused by Soil Liquefaction for Bogura Sadar, Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development.
14. [14] Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2007). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. John Wiley & Sons.
15. [15] Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford university press.
16. [16] Li, J., & Heap, A. D. (2014). Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 53, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008
17. [17] Chen, C., Hu, K., Li, W., Li, Z., & Li, B. (2015). Three-dimensional mapping of clay content in alluvial soils using hygroscopic water content. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(8), 4339-4346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3720-9
18. [18] Basarir, H., Kumral, M., Karpuz, C., & Tutluoglu, L. (2010). Geostatistical modeling of spatial variability of SPT data for a borax stockpile site. Engineering Geology, 114(3-4), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.04.012
19. [19] Gomez-Hernandez, J. J., & Journel, A. G. (1990, September). Stochastic characterization of grid-block permeabilities: from point values to block tensors. In ECMOR II-2nd European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery (pp. cp-231). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201411102
20. [20] Hooshmand, A., Delghandi, M., Izadi, A., & Aali, K. A. (2011). Application of kriging and cokriging in spatial estimation of groundwater quality parameters. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(14), 3402-3408. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.027
21. [21] Sitharam, T. G., & Samui, P. (2007). Geostatistical modelling of spatial and depth variability of SPT data for Bangalore. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, 2(4), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020701678851
22. [22] Balasubramani, D. P., & Dodagoudar, G. R. (2022). Modelling the spatial variability of Standard Penetration Test data for Chennai City using kriging and product-sum model. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 17(1), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1707884
23. [23] Vessia, G., Di Curzio, D., & Castrignanò, A. (2020). Modeling 3D soil lithotypes variability through geostatistical data fusion of CPT parameters. Science of the Total Environment, 698, 134340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134340
24. [24] Wang, C. H., Harken, B., Osorio-Murillo, C. A., Zhu, H. H., & Rubin, Y. (2016). Bayesian approach for probabilistic site characterization assimilating borehole experiments and Cone Penetration Tests. Engineering Geology, 207, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.002
25. [25] Cabalar, A. F., Karabas, B., Mahmutluoglu, B., & Yildiz, O. (2021). An IDW-based GIS application for assessment of geotechnical characterization in Erzincan, Turkey. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(20), 2129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08481-6
26. [26] Hossain, M. B., & Rahman, M. M. (2025). Seismic microzonation and probability of ground failure assessment caused by liquefaction for Bogura District, Bangladesh. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 13(2), 222-247. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2024.34111.2086
27. [27] Skempton, A. W. (1986). Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation. Geotechnique, 36(3), 425-447. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425.
28. [28] Peck, R. B., Hanson, W. E., & Thornburn, T. H. (1991). Foundation engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
29. [29] Skempton, A. W. (1986). Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation. Geotechnique, 36(3), 425-447. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425
30. [30] Bolton Seed, H., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., & Chung, R. M. (1985). Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 111(12), 1425-1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)07339410(1985)111:12(1425)
31. [31] Rahman, M. M. (2019). Foundation design using standard penetration test (spt) n-value. Researchgate, 5, 1-39.
32. [32] Gibbs, H. (1957). Research on determining the density of sands by spoon penetration testing. 4th International Conference on SMFE, 35–39.
33. [33] BNBC. (2015). Bangladesh National Building Code.
34. [34] Bowles, J. (1998). Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.
35. [35] Guo, X. D., Fu, B. J., Ma, K. M., & Chen, L. D. (2001). Utility of semivariogram for spatial variation of soil nutrients and the robust analysis of semivariogram. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 13(4), 453-458.
36. [36] Silveira, E. M. D. O., Mello, J. M. D., Acerbi, F. W., Reis, A. A. D., Withey, K. D., & Ruiz, L. A. (2017). Characterizing landscape spatial heterogeneity using semivariogram parameters derived from NDVI images. Cerne, 23(4), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723042370
37. [37] Kawser, U., Nath, B., & Hoque, A. (2022). Observing the influences of climatic and environmental variability over soil salinity changes in the Noakhali Coastal Regions of Bangladesh using geospatial and statistical techniques. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100429