Research Article

Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions

Volume: 3 Number: 2 June 28, 2017
EN

Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions

Abstract

Thermal insulation improves the strength and longevity of buildings by reducing energy consumption, and as a related result, improved energy use. The selection of insulation material is governed by important parameters, including the average outdoor air temperature, the thermal conductivity of the buildings and the cost of the insulation material. Increases in the thickness of the insulation material will gradually decrease the energy consumption for heating; however, the insulation thickness has an optimum value that minimises the total investment cost, and determination of this optimum value is critical for economic analysis. In this paper, a life-cycle cost analysis is presented to show the optimum insulation thickness, energy savings over a lifetime of 15 years and payback periods for six different fuels and insulation materials for four cities in Turkey selected from climate regions identified by the Turkish Thermal Insulation Standard (TS 825). Muğla (1st region), Kocaeli (2nd region), Ankara (3rd region) and Ardahan (4th region) were selected for analysis of a sandwich-type wall constructed from the following six insulation materials: extruded polystyrene, expanded polystyrene, glass wool, rock wool, polyisocyanurate and polyurethane. The calculations were also made on the basis of six different fuels, such as motorin, natural gas, propane (LPG), electricity, coal (imported), and fuel-oil No. 4. As a consequence, results demonstated that the optimum insulation thickness vary between 2.8 cm and 45.1 cm, with energy savings between 16.4 /m2 and 479 /m2, and payback periods fluctuating between 0.078 and 0.860 years, depending on the city, the insulation material, and the cost of fuel.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Aytac & U.T. Aksoy, Enerji Tasarrufu iç ve Dış Duvarlarda Optimum Yalıtım Kalınlığı ve Isıtma Maliyeti ilişkisi, J. Gazi Univ. Fac. Eng. Archit., vol. 21, pp. 753–758, 2006.
  2. T. Keskin, "Enerji Verimliliği Kanunu ve Uygulama Süreci", Mühendis ve Makina vol. 569, pp. 106-112, 2007.
  3. N. Evcil, "Isı İzolasyonu ve Dış Duvarların Enerji Etkin Yenilenmesi", Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2000.
  4. İzocam Tic. San. A.Ş., Isı-Teknik-Ses-Yangın Yalıtımı, İzocam Ticaret ve Sanayi A.Ş. Yayınları, İstanbul, 2002.
  5. A. Dombaycı, M. Gölcü & Y. Pancar, "Optimization of insulation thickness forexternal walls using different energy-sources", Applied Energy, vol. 83, pp. 921–928, 2006.
  6. K. Çomaklı & B. Yüksel, "Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving", Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 473–479, 2003.
  7. A. Bolattürk, "Optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degree-hours in the warmest region of Turkey", Building and Environment, vol. 43, pp. 1055-1064, 2008.
  8. O. Kaynaklı, "A study on residential heating energy requirement and optimum insulation thickness", Renewable Energy, vol. 33, pp. 1164-1172, 2008.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Cenker Aktemur
Eastern Mediterranean, University
Türkiye

Uğur Atikol This is me
Eastern Mediterranean, University
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 28, 2017

Submission Date

April 20, 2017

Acceptance Date

June 21, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Aktemur, C., & Atikol, U. (2017). Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 3(2), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.307239
AMA
1.Aktemur C, Atikol U. Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions. IJET. 2017;3(2):72-82. doi:10.19072/ijet.307239
Chicago
Aktemur, Cenker, and Uğur Atikol. 2017. “Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 3 (2): 72-82. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.307239.
EndNote
Aktemur C, Atikol U (June 1, 2017) Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 3 2 72–82.
IEEE
[1]C. Aktemur and U. Atikol, “Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions”, IJET, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 72–82, June 2017, doi: 10.19072/ijet.307239.
ISNAD
Aktemur, Cenker - Atikol, Uğur. “Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 3/2 (June 1, 2017): 72-82. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.307239.
JAMA
1.Aktemur C, Atikol U. Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions. IJET. 2017;3:72–82.
MLA
Aktemur, Cenker, and Uğur Atikol. “Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, vol. 3, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 72-82, doi:10.19072/ijet.307239.
Vancouver
1.Cenker Aktemur, Uğur Atikol. Optimum Insulation Thickness for the Exterior Walls of Buildings in Turkey Based on Different Materials, Energy Sources and Climate Regions. IJET. 2017 Jun. 1;3(2):72-8. doi:10.19072/ijet.307239

Cited By

88x31.png Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)