Associations between Personality Traits and the Quality of Sibling Relationships

Year 2018, , 22 - 31, 27.12.2018

Hamide Gözü , Joan Newman

https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.487774

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Sibling
relationship is one of the longest relationships in human life and play a major
role since some skills such as nurturance,
caretaking, and meeting their own needs and those of other people around them
(e.g. spouse, children, and parents) are fostered through sibling
interaction. Several studies have been conducted among adults to identify the
factors associated with sibling relationships. Despite its seeming importance,
only a few researchers have focused on the role of personality type in sibling
relationships. The current study examined whether Big-Five personality traits
were associated with the quality of sibling relationships among young adults.
Participants included 552 university students living in the United States of
America (54% female and 46% male) aged 18 to 25 years. Participants completed
the Lifespan Sibling Relationship Scale and the Big Five Inventory. A series
regression analyses revealed that all personality traits were significantly
associated with the quality of sibling relationships after controlling
participant’s gender and gender constellation. Of the personality traits, agreeableness
was the strongest predictor of quality of sibling relationships. The current
study’s strengths and limitations and the implications future research are
discussed.

Keywords

Sibling relationships, personality, young adults

References

• Ahmetoğlu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between love, personality, and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39, 1181-1190. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9515-5.
• Asendorpf, J. B. & Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531–1544. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1531
• Bono, J. E., Boles, T. L., Judge, T. A., & Lauver, K. J. (2002). The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. Journal of Personality, 70, 311-344. doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05007
• Brody, G. H. (1998). Sibling relationship quality: Its causes and consequences. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 1-24. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.1
• Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z. & Burke, M. (1987). Child temperaments, maternal differential behavior, and sibling relationships. Developmental Psychology, 23, 354–362. doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.354
• Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
• DeYoung, C. G. (2014). Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In M. L. Cooper and R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (V. 4, pp. 369–399). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Dunn, J. & Munn, P. (1986). Siblings and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 265-284. doi.org/10.1177/016502548600900301
• Engel, G., Olson, K. R., & Patrick, C. (2002). The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 839–853. doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00090-3.
• Fisher, T. D. & McNulty, J. K. (2008). Neuroticism and marital satisfaction: The mediating, role played by the sexual relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 112-122. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.112.
• Furman, W. & Lanthier, R. (1996). Personality and sibling relationships. In Gene H. Brody (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their causes and consequences. Norword, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42. doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
• Howe N. & Recchia H. (2006). Sibling relations and their impact on children’s development. In: R. E. Tremblay, R. G. Barr, & R. De V. Peters (Eds). Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development [online] (pp1-8). Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development. Available at: http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/documents/Howe-RecchiaANGxp.pdf.
• Howe, N., Ross, H. S., & Recchia, H. (2011). Sibling relations in early and middle childhood. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.). The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development (pp. 356-372). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Jenkins, J. & Dunn, J. (2009). Siblings within families: Levels of analysis and patterns of influence. In L. Kramer & K. J. Conger (Eds.), Siblings as agents of socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (pp.79–93). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss and N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 261-271). New York: Springer-Verlag.
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• John, O. P., & Srivasta, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin and O.P.
• John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd Ed.) (pp.102-138). New York: Guilford.
• Lamb, M. E. (1982). Sibling relationships across the lifespan: An overview and introduction. In M.E. Lamb & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the lifespan (pp. 1-11). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Lanthier, R. P. (2007). Personality traits and sibling relationships in emerging adults. Psychological Reports, 100, 672-674. doi: 10.24hh/PR0.100.2.672674
• McCoy, K. J., Brody, G. H., & Stoneman, Z. (2002). Temperament and the quality of best friendships: Effect of same-sex sibling relationships. Family Relations, 51, 248-255. doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00248.x
• Meunier, J. C., Roskam, I., Stievenart, M., van de Moortele, G., Browne, D. T., & Kumar, A. (2011). Externalizing behavior trajectories: The role of parenting, sibling relationships and child personality. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 20–33. doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.09.006
• Milevsky, A., Smoot, K., Leh, M., & Ruppe, A. (2005). Familial and contextual variables and the nature of sibling relationships in emerging adulthood. Marriage and Family Review, 37, 123-141. doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n04_07
• Neale, C. W. (2003). Perceived sibling compatibility and the effects of personality. Unpublished Master’s thesis. University of Georgia, GA.
• Newman, J. (1991). College students’ relationships with siblings. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 629-644.
• Pollet, T. V. & Nettle, D. (2009). Birth order and adult family relationships: Firstborns have better sibling relationships than laterborns. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1029-1046. doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347940.
• Riggio, H. R. (2000). Measuring attitudes toward adult sibling relationships: The Lifespan Sibling Relationship Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 707-728. doi.org/10.1177/0265407500176001
• Spitze, G. & Trent, K. (2006). Gender differences in adult sibling relations in two-child families. Journal of Marriage and Family 68, 977–992. doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00308.x
• Stocker, C. M., Lanthier, R. P., & Furman, W. (1997). Sibling relationships in early adulthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 210-221. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.11.2.210