Exploring Immigration Experiences in the USA: Evaluating Traditional Assimilation Theories with a Latinx Focus

Abstract

Classical assimilation theories avoided further exploration of the assimilation processes and operations of ethnic organizations. Thus, the current study adopts the format of an extended narrative review article, analyzing classical theoretical perspectives on assimilation. This paper sheds light on the complex interplay of factors influencing the process while critically evaluating the utility of classical assimilation theories in contemporary immigration settings. The present study embarks on a comprehensive exploration of immigrant experiences across different Latinx generations in the United States, with a focus on the role of ethnic enclaves. The results reveal the following: a) there have been multifaceted barriers that need to be evaluated related to immigrant integration, including language proficiency, disparities in educational attainment, income inequality, occupational segregation, socioeconomic status disparities, and residential choices; b) these can stem from experiences of discrimination and exclusion. Hence, concerns related to ill-treatment across immigrant generations might differ. In summary, this paper examines the limitations of traditional assimilation theories in explaining contemporary immigrant experiences and outcomes in the U.S.

Keywords

• Assimilation
• immigrant
• ethnic
• exclusion
• residential segregation
• integration

References

1. Abramitzky, R., Boustan, L. P., & Eriksson, K. (2014). A nation of immigrants: Assimilation and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration. Journal of Political Economy, 122(3), 467–506. https://doi.org/10.1086/67580
2. Abramitzky, R., Boustan, L., Jácome, E., & Pérez, S. (2021). Intergenerational mobility of immigrants in the United States over two centuries. American Economic Review, 111(2), 580- 608.
3. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. The International Migration Review, Winter, 1997, 31(4), 826-874.
4. Alba, Richard D., & Victor Nee. (2003). Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and the New Immigration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Anzaldúa, G. (2014). La conciencia de la mestiza: Towards a new consciousness. In Chicana Feminist Thought (pp. 271-274). Routledge.
6. Bean, F. D., & Stevens, G. (2003). America’s Newcomers and the Dynamics of Diversity, Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Brown, S. K., & Bean, F. D. (2006). Assimilation models, old and new: Explaining a long-term process. Migration Information Source, 10, 3-41.
8. Conzen, K. N. (1979). Immigrants, immigrant neighborhoods, and ethnic identity: Historical issues. The Journal of American History, 66(3), 603-615.

9. Duncan, B., & Trejo, S. J. (2015). Assessing the socioeconomic mobility and integration of US immigrants and their descendants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657(1), 108-135.
10. Flippen, Chenoa A. and Dylan Farrell-Bryan. (2021). New Destinations and the Changing Geography of Immigrant Incorporation, Annual Review of Sociology, 47,479–500.
11. Gans, H. J. (2007). Acculturation, assimilation and mobility. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(1), 152-164.
12. Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. Oxford University Press.
13. Hall, M. (2013). Residential integration on the new frontier: Immigrant segregation in established and new destinations. Demography, 50(5), 1873-1896.
14. Hugo Lopez, M., Gonzalez-Barrera, A., & Lopez, G. (2018). Hispanic identity fades across generations as immigrant connections fall away. Pew Hispanic Research Center.
15. Massey, D. S. & Denton, Nancy. (1985). Spatial Assimilation as a Socioeconomic Outcome, American Sociological Review, (50),94-106.
16. Noordzij, M., Dekker, F. W., Zoccali, C., & Jager, K. J. (2011). Sample size calculations. Nephron Clinical Practice, 118(4), 319-323.
17. Qadeer, M., & Kumar, S. (2006). Ethnic enclaves and social cohesion. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 15(2), 1-17.
18. Pew Research Center. (2016, March 31). 10 demographic trends that are shaping the U.S. and the world. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2016/03/31/10-demographic-trends-that-are-shaping-theu-s-and-the-world/.
19. Pew Research Center. (2021, April 29). Key facts about Asian Americans. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch. org/short-reads/2021/04/29/key-facts-about-asian-americans/.
20. Phillips, D. (2007). Ethnic and racial segregation: a critical perspective. Geography Compass, 1(5), 1138-1159.
21. Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (2015). The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants (pp. 221- 242). Routledge.
22. Reitz, J. G., & Sklar, S. M. (1997). Culture, Race, and The Economic Assimilation of Immigrants. In Sociological Forum (12(2), pp. 233-277). Kluwer Academic Publishers- Plenum Publishers.
23. South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Chavez, E. (2005). Geographic mobility and spatial assimilation among us Latino immigrants, The International Migration Review, 39(3), 577-607.
24. Shibutani, T., & Kwan, K. M. (2005). Assimilation into The Larger Society. Incorporating Diversity: Rethinking Assimilation in A Multicultural Age, New York: Routledge, 59-81.
25. Stepick, A., & Stepick, C. D. (2010). The complexities and confusions of segmented assimilation, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(7), 1149-1167.
26. Yancey, W. L., Ericksen, E. P., & Juliani, R. N. (1976). Emergent ethnicity: A review and reformulation. American Sociological Review, 391-403.
27. Yinger, J. M. (1981). Toward a theory of assimilation and dissimilation, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 4(3), 249-264.