INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY BEHAVIOURS ON THE CLIMATE SAFETY OF WORKERS ACCORDING TO PLANNED BEHAVIOUR THEORY

Year 2019, , 110 - 123, 27.08.2019

Necmettin Çiftçi Sonay Bilgin

https://doi.org/10.23884/ijhsrp.2019.4.2.05

Abstract

The study was conducted
to examine the relationship between safety climate and factors affecting
occupational health and safety behaviors of workers. The research was carried out at the Mus Sugar Factory in Mus city
center between July 2015 and December 2016. The researchers' universe was
formed by 321 workers in the Mus Sugar Factory. To collect data:
"Questions about socio-demographic characteristics of workers", ‘The
scale used to evaluate workers' behavior’ and ‘Security Climate Scale’ were
used. The average points of the scale used to evaluate behavior of the workers
was determined to be 122.04±21.840. The average points of workers' safety
climate was found to be 53.87 ± 11.430. It
was seen that the behavior of the workers was 
higher than the average of the total points, the gender, the family type
did not affect the behavior (p>0.05), the norms of the chefs, the norms of
the workmates and the security behavior affected the security climate
(p<0.05).

Keywords

Safety behavior, Safety climate, Planned behavior theory

References

• 1. Demirel S. Worker's Health and Work Safety, TURK-IS, Publications, 2001.
• 2. Arıcı K. Occupational Health and Safety Lessons, TES-İŞ, Trade Union, 1999.
• 3. Danna K, Griffin RW, “Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literatüre”, Journal of management, 25,357-84. 1999.
• 4. Bilir N. A “Contemporary Approach to Occupational Health and Safety: Risk Assessment and Risk Management”, Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 25, 9-11. 2005.
• 5. Mustafa Ö. Legal, “Criminal and Administrative Liability in Work Accidents”, Ankara Bar Association Magazine, 2, 216. 2015.
• 6. Fugas CS, Silva SA, Meliá JL, “Another look at safety climate and safety behavior: Deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45, 468-77, 2012.
• 7. Ünal D, Aycan N, “Manisa MAY Textile Industry in the Inc. Examining the reasons for the application of the working workers to the workplace health unit and their sociodemographic characteristics”, Journal of Nursing Forum, 6, 49-57, 2003.
• 8. Mearns KJ, Flin R “Assessing the state of organizational safety—culture or climate?”, Current Psychology, 18, 5-17, 1999.
• 9. Lawton R, Parker D, “Individual differences in accident liability: A review and integrative approach”, Human Factors, 40, 655-71, 1998.
• 10. Armitage CJ, Conner M, “Social cognition models and health behaviour: A structured review”, Psychology and health, 15, 173-89, 2000.
• 11. Ajzen I, “Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior”, Journal of applied social psychology, 32, 665-83, 2002.
• 12. Fishbein M, Ajzen I , “ Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and Research”, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10, 130-132, 1977.
• 13. Ajzen I, “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179-211, 1991.
• 14. Zohar D, “ Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications”, Journal of applied psychology, 65, 96, 1980.
• 15. Cooper MD, “Phillips RA. Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship”, Journal of safety research, 35, 497-512, 2004.
• 16. Clarke S, “The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 315-327, 2006.
• 17. Clarke S, “ An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta‐analysis”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational psychology, 83, 553-78, 2010.
• 18. Hofmann DA, Stetzer A.” The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events”, Academy of management journal, 41, 6, 644-57, 1998.
• 19. Erci B, Avcı İ, Hacıalioğlu N, Kılıç D, Tanrıverdi G. Public Health Nursing. Göktuğ Publishing, Ankara, 306-7, 2014.
• 20. Fugas CS, Meliá JL, Silva SA.” The “is” and the “ought”: how do perceived social norms influence safety behaviors at work?”, Journal of occupational health psychology, 16, 67-, 2011.21. Davis LE, Ajzen I, Saunders J, Williams T. “The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 810, 2002.
• 22. Conner M, McMillan B, “Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: Studying cannabis use”, British journal of social psychology, 38, 195-222, 1999.
• 23. Burke MJ, Sarpy SA, Tesluk PE, SMITH‐CROWE K. General safety performance: A test of a grounded theoretical model. Personnel Psychology, 55, 429-57, 2002.
• 24. Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP, Gerras SJ. “Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170, 2003.
• 25. Choudhry RM, Fang D, Lingard H. “Measuring safety climate of a construction company”, Journal of construction Engineering and Management, 135, 890-9, 2009.
• 26. Türen U, Gökmen Y, Tokmak İ, Bekmezci M. “The Reliability and Validity of Safety Climate Scale”, Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 19, 171-190, 2014.
• 27. Avcı C. Examining Employees’ Workplace Health And Safety Behaviours In The Scope Of The Safety Climate And The Theory Of Planned Behaviour: a Case Study Of Food and Beverage Departments at Accommodation Enterprices, Gazi University Graduate School Of Social Sciences, Ph D. Thesis, Ankara, 2014.
• 28. Demirbilek T. Business Safety Culture, legal publishing, İzmir, 2005.
• 29. Gyekye SA., Salminen S. “Age and workers' perceptions of workplace safety: A comparative study”, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 68, 171-84, 2009.
• 30. Sarı FÖ. “Effects of employee trainings on the occupational safety and health in accommodation sector”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1865-70, 2009.
• 31. Garcia A, Boix P, Canosa C. “Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers”, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61, 239-46, 2004.
• 32. Hahn SE, Murphy LR. “A short scale for measuring safety climate”, Safety Science, 46, 1047-66, 2008.
• 33. Külekçi B. An Assessment Research of Ship Building İndustry Workers' Occupational Health and Safety Perceptions, Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, Master Thesis, 2012.
• 34. Yegin A. The Effects of İndustrial Accidents to The Safety Culture, Gedik University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, Master Thesis, 2015.
• 35. Gül A. A Study on The Correlation Between Safety Climate Culture and Healthcare Workers' Safety Conditions: a Field Research, Atılım University, Institute of Social Sciences, Master Thesis, Ankara, 2015.
• 36. Ocaktan M.E. Assesment of Safety Culture in an Automotive Plant, Ankara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, Ph D, Thesis, 2009.
• 37. Koç T.S. The Effect of Occupational Health and Safety Practices on Organizational Trust and Job Satisfaction: A Study On Accommodation Enterprises İn Alanya, Akdeniz University, Institute of Social Sciences, Antalya, Master Thesis, 2015.
• 38. Tüzüner VL, Özaslan BÖ. “A research based on the evaluation of occupational safety and health applications in hospitals”, Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 40, 138-154, 2011.
• 39. Vinodkumar M, Bhasi M. Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry, Safety Science, 47, 659-67, 2009.
• 40. Üngüren E, Koç TS. “The ımpact of occupatıonal health and safety practıces ın the hospıtalıty busıness on organızatıonal trust”, ISGUC, The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 18, 123-156. 2016.