KOLORTA NURSING ATTITUDE SCALE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Year 2021, , 73 - 84, 28.04.2021

Yalçin Kanbay , Elif Işık , Özgür Aslan , Pınar Tektaş , Aysun Akçam

https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.793665

Abstract

In this study, for the purpose of determining the attitudes of nurses and nursing undergraduate students towards the nursing profession, the validity and reliability study was tried to be performed for the "Kolorta Nursing Attitude Scale." In the study, the experiment form consisting of 45 expressions was applied to a sample of 1034 participants, of which 76.3% were female, 43.4% were nurses, and 56.6% were nursing students. The scale validity and reliability study consisted of the steps of examination of the theoretical structure, obtainment of the work permit, the stage of item writing, the language and psychometric controls, the pilot application for the item selection, obtainment of an expert opinion, creation of the experiment form and its application to the sample, validity and reliability, and finalization of the scale. The validity of the scale was determined by examining the structural validity and internal validity of the scale. Factor analysis was used to determine the structural validity, and 27% subgroup and supergroup comparison was used to determine the internal validity. In order to test the reliability of the scale, the Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient and test-retest consistency were calculated. The developed “Kolorta nursing attitude scale” consists of 3 sub-dimensions and 23 items, and it can explain 61.6 of the total variance for nursing attitudes. The total score of the scale ranges from 23 to 115, and the increase in score means a positive attitude towards nursing. The general Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated as .90, which indicates high reliability. According to the results, it is observed that the “Kolorta nursing attitude scale,” of which validity and reliability study was performed for the purpose of measuring attitudes towards nursing, can perform measurements in a valid and reliable way.

Keywords

Nursing, Attitudes, Validity, reliability

References

• [1] Özcan A. Hemşire- Hasta İlişkisi ve İletişim, Sistem Ofset, Ankara,2006.
• [2] Khorshid L, Eşer İ, Zaybak A, Güneş ÜY, Çınar Ş. “Hemşirelik yüksekokulu mezunlarının aldıkları lisans eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri”. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 23 (1):1-14, 2007.
• [3] Eren E. Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi, Genişletilmiş (6.b), Beta Basım, İstanbul, 2000. [4] Uğur Gök A, Kocaman G. “Reasons for leaving nursing: A study among Turkish nurses”, Contemporary Nurse,39(1): 65–74,2011. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu. 2011.39.1.65 [5] World Health Organization (WHO). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030, viewed 26 August 2018, http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250368/9789241511131 eng.pdf?sequence=1.
• [6] Liu JX, Goryakin Y, Maeda A, Bruckner T, Scheffler R. “Global health workforce labor market projections for 2030”, Human Resources for Health,15(1); 11,2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0187-2
• [7] Rezaei-Adaryani M, Salsali M, Mohammadi E. “Nursing image: An evolutionary concept analysis”, Contemporary Nurse, 43(1), 81–89,2012. https://doi.org/ 10.5172/conu.2012.43.1.81
• [8] Tezbaşaran A. Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu, e kitap. 3. Sürüm, Mersin, 2008.
• [9] Altıntaş S, Baykal Ü. “İşe Karşı Tutum Ölçeği’nin Hemşireler İçin Uyarlanması”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi,11(1),2008.
• [10] Miligi E, Selim A. “Saudi Nursing Students’ Attitudes towards the Nursng Profession”, European Journal of Business and Management,6(29), 197-208,2014.
• [11] Taşkın Yılmaz F, Tiryaki Şen H, Demirkaya F. “Hemşirelerin ve Ebelerin Mesleklerini Algılama Biçimleri ve Gelecekten Beklentileri”. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetim Dergisi,3(1), 130-139,2014.
• [12] Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yaıncılık, 2008.
• [13] DeVellis R F. Ölçek Geliştirme, (3. B. Çev. Ed. Tarık Totan, Çev.) Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2014.
• [14] Erkuş A. Psikolojide Ölçme ve Ölçek Geliştirme-1, Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2014.
• [15] Turan İ, Şimşek Ü, Aslan H. “Eğitim araştırmalarında likert ölçeği ve likert-tipi soruların kullanımı ve analizi”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 186-203,2015.
• [16] Şeker H, Gençdoğan B. Psikolojide ve Eğitimde Ölçme Aracı Geliştirme, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2006.
• [17] Karasar N. Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2010.
• [18] Tan Ş. Öğretimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme KPSS El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık, 2014.
• [19] Pallant J. SPSS kullanma kılavuzu (Çev: Sibel Balcı, Berat Ahi), Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 2016.
• [20] Şencan H. Sosyal ve Davranışsal bilimlerde Bilimsel Araştırma, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2007.
• [21] Ho R. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and ınterpretation with SPSS, London&New York : Chapman & Hall / CRC Taylor and Francis Group, 2006.
• [22] Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları (3. b.), Ankara, Pegem Akademi, 2014.
• [23] Tavşancıl E. Tutumların lçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi (4. b.), Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2010.
• [24] Sönmez V, Alacapınar FS. Sosyal bilimlerde ölçme aracı hazırlama, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 2016.
• [25] Can A. SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi, Ankara: PEGEM Akademi, 2017.
• [26] Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2010.