REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES FOLLOWING FROZEN-THAWED EMBRYO TRANSFER IS SUPERIOR WITH THE TRANSFER OF BLASTOCYSTS EXPANDED ON DAY 5 THAN ON DAY 6

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 190 - 199, 27.08.2021

Serkan Oral , Bulat Aytek Şık , Özkan Özdamar , Yaşam Kemal Akpak , Yılda Arzu Aba

https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.867448

Abstract

Abstract: To compare pregnancy and live birth rates between D5 and D6 transfer of frozen-thawed blastocysts in women undergoing ‘freeze-all’ cycles. This retrospective cohort study included 209 single autologous frozen–thawed blastocyst transfers. This cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the day of blastocyst expansion: (i) D5 blastocysts and (ii) D6 blastocysts. A ‘freeze-all’ strategy was adopted using GnRH antagonist cycles and vitrification as the method of freezing. Pregnancy rate was higher in D5 group as compared to D6 group, although not statistically significant (72.6% vs. 59.6%, respectively, p=0.078). Live birth rate was significantly higher in D5 group than in D6 group (66.9% vs. 48.1%, respectively, p=0.015). The rates of abortus, biochemical pregnancy and preterm birth were comparable between the groups. Live birth rate is superior when blastocysts expanded on D5 are used in frozen–thawed cycles, compared to those expanded on D6. The day of the blastocyst expansion appears to be an important predictor of pregnancy outcome and, thus, taken into account as well as D5 embryos should be given priority in frozen-thawed transfer cycles.

Keywords

frozen embryo transfer, live birth rate, Day 5 versus Day 6, blastocyst vitrification

References

• [1] Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: A prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders. Fertil Steril 2011;96:516–8.
• [2] Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;99:156–62.
• [3] Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Cost-effectiveness of the freeze-all policy. JBRA Assist Reprod 2015;19:125–30.
• [4] Hill MJ, Royster GD, Healy MW, Richter KS, Levy G, DeCherney AH, et al. Are good patient and embryo characteristics protective against the negative effect of elevated progesterone level on the day of oocyte maturation? Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1477-84.e1-5.
• [5] Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev 2006;27:170–207.
• [6] Stanger JD, Yovich JL. Follicle recruitment determines IVF productivity rate via the number of embryos frozen and subsequent transfers. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:286–296.
• [7] Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, Yeh JS, Price TM, Goldfarb JM, Muasher SJ. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2014;101:967–973.
• [8] Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in-vitro fertilisation treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012;98:368–77.
• [9] Alur-Gupta S, Hopeman M, Berger DS, Gracia C, Barnhart KT, Coutifaris C, Senapati S. Impact of method of endometrial preparation for frozen blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcome: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2018; 10(4):680-686.
• [10] Papanikolaou EG, D’Haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3198–3203.
• [11] Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1139–1146.
• [12] Fernandez-Shaw S, Cercas R, Bran a C, Villas C, Pons I. Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32: 177–184.
• [13] Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;30: CD002118.
• [14] Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril 2001;75:1126–1130.
• [15] Barrenetxea G, López de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jiménez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril 2005;83:49–53.
• [16] El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, Singh A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, Braude P. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles. BJOG 2011;118:1551–1556.
• [17] Poulsen V, Ingerslev HJ, Kirkegaard K. Elective embryo transfers on Day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on Day 5. Hum Reprod 2017;32:1238–1243.
• [18] Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Ross R. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):20–6.
• [19]GroenewoudER,CohlenBJ,MacklonNS.Programming the endometrium for deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos: hormone replacement versus modified natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):768-774.
• [20] Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril 2006;86:20–26.
• [21] Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L, Attaran M, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1370–1378.
• [22] Haas J, Meriano J, Laskin C, Bentov Y, Barzilay E, Casper RF,Cadesky K. Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:1553–1557.
• [23] Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, Santulli P, Barraud-Lange V, Le Foll N, Maignien C, Chapron C, de Ziegler D, Wolf JP, Pocate-Cheriet K. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocystsexpanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):390-398.
• [24] Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki AA. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril 2002;77:697–699.
• [25] Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Hennessy S, James AN, Yauger BJ, Larsen FW. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2138–2143.
• [26] Wang X, Zhen J, Sun Z, Yu Q, Deng C, Zhou Y, Wang H, He F. Effects of fifth day (D5) or sixth day (D6) frozen-thawed blastocysts on neonatal outcomes. Zygote 2016;24:684–691.
• [27] Kaye L, Will EA, Bartolucci A, Nulsen J, Benadiva C, Engmann L. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017;34:913–919.
• [28] Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1999;11:307–311.
• [29] Elgindy E, Elsedeek MS. Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(10):1111–5.
• [30] Yang H, Yang Q, Dai S, Li G, Jin H, Yao G, Sun Y. Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:865–872.
• [31] Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1173–1181.
• [32] Sunkara SK, Siozos A, Bolton VN, Khalaf Y, Braude PR, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1906–1915.
• [33] Tubbing A. Shaw-Jackson C, Ameye L, Colin J, Rozenberg S, Autin C. Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017;33:1553–1557.
• [34] Machtinger R, Racowsky C. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(3):210-21.