Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review

Volume: 7 Number: 4 December 1, 2018
  • Oluwasegun Ishaya Adelaiye
  • Aminat Showole
  • Silas Ageebee Faki

Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review

Abstract

Advanced Persistent Threat APT is a targeted attack method used by a sophisticated, determined and skilled adversary to maintain undetected access over an extended period for exfiltration of valuable data. APT poses high threat levels to organizations especially government organizations. 60% of the problem is the inability to detect penetration using traditional mitigation methods. Numerous researches indicate that vulnerabilities exists in most organizations and when exploited will have major fininacial implications and also affect the organization’s reputation. Traditional methods for mitigating threats against security breaches have proved ineffective. This project aims at evaluating the utilization and effectiveness of Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation techniques using existing literature and thereby providing a synopsis on APT. A method-based approach is adopted, reviewing the researches and a comparative analysis of the methods used in the mitigation of APT. The study compares 25 researches, which proposed methods in mitigating the threat, were filtered separating mitigation methods from review articles, identifying the threats etc. from a wide range of research reports between 2011 and 2017. These 25 researches were analysed to show the effectiveness of 12 mitigation methods utilized by the researchers. In mitigating APT multiple methods are employed by 72% of the researchers. The major methods used in mitigating APT are Traffic/data analysis 30% , Pattern recognition 21% and anomaly Detection 16% . These three methods work inline with providing effective internal audit, risk management and cooperate governance as highlighted in COBIT5 an IT management and governance framework by ISACA.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Merete Ask, Petro Bondarenko, John Erik Rekdal, Andre´ Nordbø, Pieter Bloemerus, and Dmytro Piatkivskyi. Advanced persistent threat (apt) beyond the hype. Project Report in IMT4582 Network Security at Gjøvik University College, Springer, 2013.
  2. [2] Parth Bhatt, Edgar Toshiro Yano, and Per Gustavsson. Towards a framework to detect multi-stage advanced persistent threats attacks. In 2014 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering. IEEE, apr 2014.
  3. [3] Beth Binde, Russ McRee, and Terrence J OConnor. Assessing outbound traffic to uncover advanced persistent threat. SANS Institute. Whitepaper, page 16, 2011.
  4. [4] Ross Brewer. Advanced persistent threats: minimising the damage. Network Security, 2014(4):5–9, apr 2014.
  5. [5] Guillaume Brogi and Valerie Viet Triem Tong. TerminAPTor: Highlighting advanced persistent threats through information flow tracking. In 2016 8th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS). IEEE, nov 2016.
  6. [6] Bulgurcu, Cavusoglu, and Benbasat. Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quarterly, 34(3):523, 2010.
  7. [7] Christian Cachin, Marko Vukolic Sorniotti, and Thomas Weigold. Blockchain, cryptography, and consensus, 2016.
  8. [8] J Vijaya Chandra, Narasimham Challa, and Mohammed Ali Hussain. Data and information storage security from advanced persistent attack in cloud computing. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 9(20):7755–7768, 2014.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Oluwasegun Ishaya Adelaiye This is me

Aminat Showole This is me

Silas Ageebee Faki This is me

Publication Date

December 1, 2018

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 7 Number: 4

APA
Adelaiye, O. I., Showole, A., & Faki, S. A. (2018). Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review. International Journal of Information Security Science, 7(4), 159-171. https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX
AMA
1.Adelaiye OI, Showole A, Faki SA. Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review. IJISS. 2018;7(4):159-171. https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX
Chicago
Adelaiye, Oluwasegun Ishaya, Aminat Showole, and Silas Ageebee Faki. 2018. “Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review”. International Journal of Information Security Science 7 (4): 159-71. https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX.
EndNote
Adelaiye OI, Showole A, Faki SA (December 1, 2018) Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review. International Journal of Information Security Science 7 4 159–171.
IEEE
[1]O. I. Adelaiye, A. Showole, and S. A. Faki, “Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review”, IJISS, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 159–171, Dec. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX
ISNAD
Adelaiye, Oluwasegun Ishaya - Showole, Aminat - Faki, Silas Ageebee. “Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review”. International Journal of Information Security Science 7/4 (December 1, 2018): 159-171. https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX.
JAMA
1.Adelaiye OI, Showole A, Faki SA. Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review. IJISS. 2018;7:159–171.
MLA
Adelaiye, Oluwasegun Ishaya, et al. “Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review”. International Journal of Information Security Science, vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2018, pp. 159-71, https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX.
Vancouver
1.Oluwasegun Ishaya Adelaiye, Aminat Showole, Silas Ageebee Faki. Evaluating Advanced Persistent Threats Mitigation Effects:A Review. IJISS [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1;7(4):159-71. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA27KM42PX