Cinsiyet Değişkenine Bağlı Girişimcilik Amacı: Üniversite Öğrencileri Örneği

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 198 - 211, 31.12.2024

Laura Agolli , Mert Horoz , Derya Sivuk

https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.1581922

Abstract

Bu makale, Ankara’daki üniversite öğrencileri arasında cinsiyet değişkenlerine bağlı olarak girişimcilik niyetlerindeki farklılıkları incelemektedir. Çalışma, 287 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir: 127 erkek ve 160 kadın. Çalışma sonuçları, erkek öğrencilerin girişimcilik puanlarının kadın öğrencilerden önemli ölçüde daha yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgu, çok değişkenli varyans analizi (MANOVA) sonuçlarıyla da tutarlıdır. Cinsiyet bağımsız değişken olarak kullanılmıştır. Liderlik, Yenilik, Üretkenlik ve Sorumluluk bağımlı değişkenlerdir. Erkekler ve kadınlar arasında dört girişimcilik niyeti faktörünün birleşik etkileri üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur. Ortalama puanlara bakıldığında, erkeklerin kadınlardan biraz daha yüksek sorumluluk, liderlik, yenilik ve üretkenlik seviyeleri bildirdiği görülmüştür. Cinsiyet farkları, yaş, gelir seviyesi, eğitim seviyesi, istihdam durumu, ailenin kendi işi, annenin çalışıyor olması ve girişimcilik yönü gibi diğer değişkenler kontrol altına alınarak yapılan çok değişkenli kovaryans analizinde de anlamlı kalmıştır. Analiz, eş değişkenlerin kontrol edildikten sonra girişimcilik niyetlerinde cinsiyet farklarının (yani çok değişkenli ana etkilerinin) mevcut olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

Cinsiyet, Girişimcilik Amacı, Üniversite Öğrencileri

ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS CONCERNING GENDER VARIABLE: THE CASE OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

This study examines differences in entrepreneurial intentions concerning gender variables using Turkish university students in Ankara, Türkiye. The study was conducted on 287 students: 127 males and 160 females. The study results showed that the entrepreneurship scores of male students were significantly higher than female students. This finding is also consistent with the results obtained from multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Gender was used as an independent variable. Leadership, Innovation, Productivity, and Responsibility factors were used as dependent variables. There was a statistically significant difference between males and females on the combined effects of four entrepreneurship intentions factors as dependent variables. An inspection of the mean scores indicated that males reported slightly higher levels of responsibility, leadership, innovation, and productivity than females. Gender differences in the four factors remained significant with multivariate analysis of co-variance analysis while controlling for other variables, such as age, income level, education level, employment status, family's own business, mother's work, and the entrepreneurial aspect. This analysis reveals that gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions (i.e. multivariate main effect) existed after controlling for these covariates.

Keywords

Gender, Entrepreneurial Intentions, University Students.

References

• Arasteh, H., Enayati, T., Zameni, F., & Khademloo, A. (2012). Entrepreneurial personality characteristics of university students: A case study. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 46, 5736-5740.
• Belas, J., Gavurova, B., Schonfeld, J., Zvarikova, K., & Kacerauskas, T. (2017). Social and economic factors affecting the entrepreneurial intention of university students. Transformations in Business & Economics, 16(3), 220-239.
• Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
• Blackstone, A. (2003). Gender roles and society. Julia R. Miller, Richard M. Lerner, Lawrence B.Schiamberg (Ed.), İnsan ekolojisi: Çocukların, ailelerin, toplulukların ve çevrelerin ansiklopedisi, 335-338.
• Chakraborty, A. A. (2020). Comparative analysis of women entrepreneurship vs men entrepreneurship in west Bengal. Research Review Journals, 5(8), 233-237.
• Chipeta, E. M., Kruse, P., & Surujlal, J. (2020). Effects of gender on antecedents to social entrepreneurship among university students in South Africa. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 12(1), 18-33.
• Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Management, 29(3), 62-74.
• Demirdirek, H., & Sener, Ü. (2014). Gender Equality Scorecard for 81 Cities, retriewed from; www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/13950514583. TEPAV.
• De Vita, L., Mari, M., & Poggesi, S. (2014). Women entrepreneurs in and from developing countries: Evidence from the literature. European Management Journal, 32(3), 451-460.
• Díaz-García, M. C., & Jiménez-Moreno, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention: The role of gender. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 261-283.
• Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press. (First publishers 1987).
• Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2008). The role of gender identity in explaining sex differences in business owners' career satisfier preferences. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 244-256.
• Edström, J., Aly, R., Greig, A., Walker, C., Babenko, S., Çağlar, M., Kudaibergenova, D.T., & Müller, C.M. (2019). Masculinities and Transition: Enduring Privilege?
• Estelami, H. (2020). The effects of need for cognition, gender, risk preferences and marketing education on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 93-109.
• Eyel, C. Ş., Kaplan, B., & Unkaya, G. (2020). The effect of business administration students' individual values on their entrepreneurial tendency in Istanbul. Economics & Sociology, 13(4), 187-212.
• Gray, L., Boyle, A., Francks, E., & Yu, V. (2019). The power of small-scale solar: Gender, energy poverty, and entrepreneurship in Tanzania. Development in Practice, 29(1), 26-39.
• Gupta, V. K., Goktan, A. B., & Gunay, G. (2014). Gender differences in evaluation of new business opportunity: A stereotype threat perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 273-288.
• Gure, G. S. (2017). Gender influences on the entrepreneurial intentions & entrepreneurial attitude of university students. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 7(8), 746-759.
• Herdjiono, I., Puspa, Y. H., Maulany, G., & Aldy, E. (2017). The factors affecting entrepreneurship intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge Issue, 2(5), 5-15.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, CA: Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
• Jena, R. K. (2020). Measuring the impact of business management student's attitude towards entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106275, 1-10.
• Khoury, B. & Fayad, Y. I. (2013). Gender roles. The Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
• Krueger, Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
• Ledesma, A., McCulloh, C., Wieck, H., & Yang, M. (2014). Health care sector overview. Wahington State University.
• Malach‐Pines, A., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Now you see them, now you don't: Gender differences in entrepreneurship. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23 (7).
• Malmström, M., Johansson, J., & Wincent, J. (2017). Gender stereotypes and venture support decisions: How governmental venture capitalists socially construct entrepreneurs’ potential. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 833-860.
• Maysami, R. C. & Ziemnowicz, C. (2007). Ethnicity, gender and entrepreneurial intentions: The Singapore perspective. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 25, 74-98.
• Mehmood, T., Alzoubi, H. M., & Ahmed, G. (2019). Schumpeterian entrepreneurship theory: Evolution and relevance. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(4).
• Mungai, E. N. & Ogot, M. (2012). Gender, culture and entrepreneurship in Kenya. International Business Research, 5(5), 175-183.
• Nowiński, W., Haddoud, M. Y., Lančarič, D., Egerová, D., & Czeglédi, C. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and gender on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in the Visegrad countries. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 361-379.
• Ochsenfeld, F. (2014). Why do women’s fields of study pay less? A test of devaluation, human capital, and gender role theory. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 536-548.
• Ozturk, Y. E., Koksal, O. & Kırac, R. (2014). Development of entrepreneurship scale for students of health management department. Development, 11(2), 582-597.
• Pandang, A., Umar, N. F., Hajati, K., & Hamidi, B. (2022). Gender disparities in students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) with various areas. Education Research International.
• Peng, Z., Lu, G., & Kang, H. (2013). Entrepreneurial intentions and its influencing factors: A survey of the university students in Xi’an China. Creative education, 3(08), 95-100.
• Rubino, L. & Freshman, B. (2005). Developing entrepreneurial competencies in the healthcare management undergraduate classroom. Journal of Health Administration Education, 22 (4), 399e416.
• Rubio-Bañón, A., & Esteban-Lloret, N. (2016). Cultural factors and gender role in female entrepreneurship. Suma de Negocios, 7(15), 9-17.
• Sancar, S. (2021). Strengthening participatory democracy in Türkiye: Monitoring gender equality project phase II 2019-2020; CEID publications, 1-180.
• Santos, F. J., Roomi, M. A., & Liñán, F. (2016). About gender differences and the social environment in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 49-66.
• Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
• Sookhtanlou, M. (2018). Analysis of gender differences on the tendency to entrepreneurship of agricultural students (Case study: University of Mohaghegh Ardabili). Journal of Entreneurship and Agriculture, 4(8), 13-22.
• Startienė, G., & Remeikienė, R. (2008). Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Engineering Economics, 60 (5).
• Sahin, T., Ocak, S., & Gider, Ö. (2019). Entrepreneurial tendency of the students: A research on the students of the department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation and nutrition and dietetics. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 14 (1), 67-77.
• Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Talas, E., Celik, A. K., & Oral, İ. O. (2013). The influence of demographic factors on entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate students as a career choice: The case of a Turkish university. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(12), 22-31.
• Turan, N., Nurten, K. A. R. A., & Aydin, G. O. (2017). Strategies for the involvement of nurses as entrepreneurs in healthcare. Press Academia Procedia, 4(1), 39-42.
• Turker, D. & Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?. Journal of European industrial training, 33(2), 142-159.
• Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2022, Haziran). Sağlık yönetimi (fakülte) programı bulunan tüm üniversiteler. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10238 Varma, C. Retrieved 25 June 2022, from http://sim.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Entrepreneurship.pdf
• Vázquez-Parra, J. C., Amézquita-Zamora, J. A., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Student perception of their knowledge of social entrepreneurship: Gender gap and disciplinary analysis of an Ashoka Changemaker campus in Latin America. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 14 (3), 1224-1241.
• Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M., & Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165-182.
• Wang, C. K. & Wong, P. K. (2004). Entrepreneurial interest of university students in Singapore. Technovation, 24(2), 163-172.
• World Economic Forum (WEF), (2019). Global gender gap report. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org /reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality)
• Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self–efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 387-406.
• Wilson, F., Kickul, J., Marlino, D., Barbosa, S. D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2009). An analysis of the role of gender and self-efficacy in developing female entrepreneurial interest and behavior. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 14(02), 105-119.
• Xiangyu, Y., Yuan, C. & Yun, L. (2017). A research on gender differences in the influence path of entrepreneurial intentions. Science Research Management, 38(6), 84.
• Xie, X., & Wu, Y. (2021). Doing well and doing good: how responsible entrepreneurship shapes female entrepreneurial success. Journal of Business Ethics, 803-828.
• Yao, X., Wu, X., & Long, D. (2016). University students’ entrepreneurial tendency in China: Effect of students’ perceived entrepreneurial environment. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 8(1), 60-81.
• Yildirim, N., Cakir, O., & Askun, O. B. (2016). Ready to dare? A case study on the entrepreneurial intentions of business and engineering students in Türkiye. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 277-289.
• Yilmaz, E. & Sunbul, A.M. (2009). Development of entrepreneurship scale for university students. Selcuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (21), 195-203.
• Yukongdi, V., & Lopa, N. Z. (2017). Entrepreneurial intention: a study of individual, situational, and gender differences. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24 (2), 333-352.
• Zaman, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial characteristics among university students: Implications for entrepreneurship education and training in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 7(39), 4053-4058.
• Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10 (3), 623-641.