Sığ Çağış Göleti'nin (Balıkesir, Türkiye) Alglerinin Mevsimsel Dağılımı ve Bazı Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Değişkenleri

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Ağustos 2023 ile Mayıs 2024 tarihleri ​​arasında Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Türkiye kampüsünde bulunan sığ bir göletin alg bileşimi ve bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal değişkenleri incelendi. Üç istasyondan (giriş, geçiş ve derin bölgeler) epilitik, epifitik, epipelik ve planktik alglerin mevsimsel örnekleri alındı. Toplam 92 tür tespit edildi, 35 tür baskın Chlorophyta grubuna, 30 tür Heterokontophyta grubuna, 21 tür Cyanobacteria grubuna, 2 tür Charophyta grubuna, 2 tür Euglenozoa grubuna, 1 tür Miozoa grubuna ve 1 tür Cryptophyta grubuna aitti. Chlorophyta toplam tür sayısının %38'ini, Heterocontophyta %33'ünü, Cyanobacteria %23'ünü, Charophyta %2'sini, Euglenozoa %2'sini, Miozoa %1'ini ve Cryptophyta %1'ini oluşturuyordu. Sonuçlar Chlorophyta'nın baskın, Heterocontophyta'nın ise alt baskın grup olduğunu gösterdi. Chlorophyta'dan en baskın türler Kasım 2023'te Tetrabaena socialis (Dujardin) H.Nozaki&M.Itoh ve Mayıs 2024'te Ettlia pseudoalveolaris (T.R.Deason&H.C.Bold) J.Komárek oldu. Heterocontophyta grubundan baskın türler Mayıs 2024'te Cyclotella meneghiniana Kützing, Ocak 2024'te Gomphonema gracile Ehrenberg emend van Heurck ve Mayıs 2024'te Nitzschia palea (Kützing) W.Smith oldu. Bu çalışmanın amacı sığ Çağış Göleti'nin (Balıkesir, Türkiye) alglerinin mevsimsel dağılımını ve bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal değişkenlerini araştırmaktır.

Keywords

• alg
• mevsimsel dağılım
• fiziksel ve kimyasal parametreler
• Çağış Göleti

Seasonal Distribution of Algae and Some Physical and Chemical Variables of the Shallow Çağış Pond (Balıkesir, Türkiye)

Abstract

In this study, algal composition and some physical and chemical variablesof a shallow pond in the campus of Balikesir University, Balıkesir, Türkiye was studied between August 2023 and May 2024. Seasonal samples of epilithic, epiphytic, epipelic and planctonic algae were taken atthree stations (inlet, transition and deep zones). A total of 92 species were identified, 35 species belonged to the dominant Chlorophyta, 30 belonged to Heterokontophyta, 21 to Cyanobacteria, 2 to Charophyta, 2 to Euglenozoa, 1 to Miozoa and 1 to Cryptophyta groups. Chlorophyta made 38%, Heterocontophyta made 33%, Cyanobacteria made 23%, Charophyta made 2%, Euglenozoa made 2%, Miozoa made 1% and Cryptophyta made 1% of the total number of species. The results showed that Chlorophyta was the dominant and Heterocontophyta was the subdominant group. The most dominant species from Chlorophyta were Tetrabaena socialis (Dujardin) H.Nozaki & M.Itoh, in November 2023 and Ettlia pseudoalveolaris (T.R.Deason & H.C. Bold) J. Komárek in May 2024. The dominant species from the Heterocontophyta group were Cyclotella meneghiniana Kützing in May 2024, Gomphonema gracile Ehrenberg emend van Heurck in Januaray 2024 and Nitzschia palea (Kützing) W.Smith in May 2024. The purpose of this study was to investigate the seasonal distribution of algae and some physical and chemical variables of the shallow Çağış Pond (Balıkesir, Türkiye).

Keywords

• algae
• seasonal distibution
• physical and chemical parameters
• Çağış Pond

References

1. Anonymous (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th Edition, APHA (American Public Health Association) Washington DC.
2. Carlson, R. E. (2007). Estimating trophic state. Lakeline, 27 (1), 25-28.
3. Çelik, K., & Sevindik, T. O. (2015). The phytoplankton functional group concept provides a reliable basis for ecological status estimation in the Çaygören Reservoir (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany, 39 (4), 588-598.
4. Duelli, P., & Obrist, M. K. (2003). Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98 (1-3), 87- 89.
5. Fairchild, G. W., Anderson, J. N. & Velinsky, D. J. (2005). The trophic state “chain of relationships” in ponds: does size matter? Hydrobiologia, 539, 35-46.
6. Guiry, M. D.& Guiry, G. M. (2014). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org. (Retrived on 22 February 2014)
7. Harsha, T. S. & Malammanavar, S. G. (2004). Assessment of phytoplankton density in relation to environmental variables in Gopalaswamy Pond at Chitradurga, Karnataka. Journal of Environmental Biology, 25 (1), 113-116.
8. Hill, M. J., Greaves, H. M., Sayer, C. D., Hassall, C., Milin, M., Milner, V. S., Marazzi, L., Hall, R., Harper, L. R., Thornhill, I., Walton, R., Biggs, J., Ewald, N., Law, A. , Willby, N., White, J. C., Briers, R. A., Mathers, K. L., Jeffries, M. J., & Wood P. J. ( 2021). Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps. Ecosphere 12 (12), e03853.

9. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1950). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswassers, 3 Teil. Cryoptophyceen, Chloromonadien, Peridineen. In: A. Thienemann (Ed), Die Binnengewasser, E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhhandlung. Stuttgart.
10. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1961). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswassers. (Die Binnengewässer, Band XVI). Teil 5. Chlorophyceae, Ordnung: Volvocales. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung. Stuttgart.
11. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1962). Das phytoplankton des süsswassers systematik und biologie, 1. Teil, Blaualgen, E. Schweizerbarth’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller), Stuttgart.
12. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1969). Das phytoplankton des süsswassers systematik und biologie, 4. Teil, Euglenophycean, E. Schweizerbarth’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller) Stuttgart.
13. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1982). Das phytoplankton des süsswassers systematik und biologie, 8. Teil, 1.Halffe ConjugatophyceaeZygnematales und Desmidiales (excl. Zygnemataceae), E. Schweizerbarth’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller). Stuttgart.
14. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. (1983). Das phytoplankton des süsswassers systematik und biologie, 7. Teil, 1.Halffe Chlorophyceae (Grünalgen) Ordnung: Chlorococcales, E. Schweizerbarth’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nagele u. Obermiller), Stuttgart.
15. Jäger, C. G., & Diehl, S. (2016). Resource Competition across Habitat Boundaries: asymmetric interactions between benthic and pelagic producers. Ecological Monographs, 84 (2), 287–302.
16. John, D. M., Whitton, B. A. & Brook, A. J. (Eds.). (2003). The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles: An identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kaplan, İ., & Yıldırım, V. (2023). Epilithic diatom assemblages and indicators for the assessment of water quality of Munzur Stream, Turkey. International Journal of Nature and Life Sciences, 7 (2), 55-64.
18. Komarek, J. & Anagnostidis, K. (2008). Cyanoprokaryota, 2. Teil/Part 2: Oscillatoriales, Süswasser Flora von Mitteleuropa 19 (2). Freshwater Flora of Central Europe.
19. Kramer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986). Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In: Süβwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag.
20. Kramer, K. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (1991). Bacillariophyceae. 3. Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunoticeae. In: Süβwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, 2 (3), Stuttgart.
21. Li, W., Xu, X., Fujibayashi, M., Niu, Q., Tanaka, N. & Nishimura, O. (2016). Response of microalgae to elevated CO 2 and temperature: impact of climate change on freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 19847–19860.
22. Malmaeus, J. M., Blenckner, T., Markensten, H. & Persson, I. (2005). Lake phosphorus dynamics and climate warming: a mechanistic model approach. Ecological Modeling, 190 (1-2), 1–14.
23. Mei, X., Gao, S., Liu, Y., Hu, J., Razlustkij, V., Rudstam, L. G. & Zhang, X. (2022). Effects of elevated temperature on resources competition of nutrient and light between benthic and planktonic algae. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 908088.
24. Oladipo, A. E. & Williams, A. B. (2003). Physicochemical parameters and phytoplankton community of some selected fishponds in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Aquatic Science, 18 (1), 53-58.
25. Peretyatko, A., Symoens, J. J. & Triest, L. (2007). Impact of macrophytes on phytoplankton in eutrophic periurban ponds, implications for pond management and restoration. Belgian Journal of Botany, 140, 83-99.
26. Reynolds, C. S. (1984). The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press.
27. Round, F. E. (1956). The phytoplankton of their water supply reservoir note Central Wales. Archive Für Hydrobiologie, 220-232.
28. Round, F. E., Crawford, R. M. & Mann, D. G. (1990). Diatoms: Morphology and Biology of the Genera. Cambridge University Press.
29. Rezvani, F., Sarrafzadeh, M., Seo, S. & Oh, H-M. (2017). Phosphorus optimization for simultaneous nitrate-contaminated groundwater treatment and algae biomass production using Ettlia sp. Bioresources Technology, 244, 785-792.
30. Schelske, C. L., Carrick, H. J., & Aldridge, F. J. (1995). Can wind-induced resuspension of meroplankton affect phytoplankton dynamics?. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 14 (4), 616-630.
31. Sims, P. A. (1996). An Atlas of British Diatoms. Dorchester: Biopress Ltd.
32. Soininen, J., Kokocinski, M., Estlander, S., Kotanen, J. & Heino, J. (2007). Neutrality, niches, and determinants of plankton metacommunity structure across boreal wetland ponds. Ecoscience, 14 (2), 146-154.
33. Stefanoff, S., Vogt, R.J., Howell, T. & Sharma, S. (2018). Phytoplankton and benthic algal response to ecosystem engineers and Multiple stressors in the nearshore of Lake Huron. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 44 (3), 447-457.
34. Wang, P., Shen, H., & Xie, P. (2012). Can hydrodynamics change phosphorus strategies of diatoms?—nutrient levels and diatom blooms in lotic and lentic ecosystems. Microbial Ecology, 63, 369-382.