ADAPTATION OF THE STUDENTS' MOTIVATION TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE TO MEASURE GREEK STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION TOWARDS BIOLOGY LEARNING

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate students’ motivation towards biology learning and to determine the factors that are related to it: students’ gender and their parents’ occupation (relevant with biology or not) were investigated. The sample of the study consisted of 360 Greek high school students of the 10^th grade (178 boys and 182 girls). The data were collected through Students’ Motivation Toward Science Learning (SMTSL) questionnaire. It was found that it was a valid and reliable tool for Greek students, with 6 sub-scales: self-efficacy, biology learning value, active learning strategies, performance goal, achievement goal and learning environment stimulation. The results of the data analysis revealed that Greek students have a moderate level of motivation towards biology learning and no statistically significant differences were found between the two genders. A significant difference between scores obtained from the ‘performance goal’ factor of the SMTBL, in favor of female students, was revealed. Moreover, it was found that students’ parents’ occupation does not have an effect on students’ motivation. All sub factors of the SMTBL scale were correlated except ‘biology learning value’ with ‘performance goal’. 

References

1. Ainley, M. (2004, November). What do we know about student motivation and engagement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, VIC.
2. Andressa, H., Gkagkavouzis, K., Tsilivi, & Mavrikaki, E. (2012). Greek high school students’ biological science knowledge and their attitudes about biotechnology and biological applications. Paper presented at the Conference «New Perspectives in science Education) (Retrieved 15 June, from http://www.pixel-online.net/science/VP_SSE08.php).
3. Araoye, M.I. (2013). Redressing Students’ Motivation and Academic Achievement in Biology Education at the Federal College of Education (Special) Oyo. (Accessed August 22, from http://conference.pixel-online.net/npse2013/common/download/Paper_pdf/071-ESM01-FP-Araoye-NPSE2013.pdf)
4. Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning Science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), 839–46. Doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.025.
5. Baram-Tsabary, A., Sethi, R.J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2010). Identifying Students’ Interests in Biology Using a Decade of Self-Generated Questions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 63-75.
6. Baser, M. (2007). The contribution of learning motivation, reasoning ability and learning orientation to ninth grade international baccalaureate and national program students’ understanding of mitosis and meiosis. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
7. Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1989). Environmental Issues as Women’s Issues: General Concerns and Local Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 586–593.
8. Cavaş, P. (2011). Factors affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for Science learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31-42.

9. Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys' and girls' interests in Science: have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557-570.
10. Dermitzaki, I., Stavroussi, P., Vavougios, D., & Kotsis, K.T. (2012). Adaptation of the Students' Motivation Towards Science Learning (SMTSL) questionnaire in the Greek language. European Journal of Psychology Education, 28, 747-766. DOI 10.1007/s10212-012-0138-1.
11. Ekici, G. (2010). Factors affecting biology lesson motivation of high school students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2137-2142.
12. Glynn, S.M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176.
13. Glynn, S.M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation with Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146.
14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., R. L. Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Heinla, E. (2006). Creative thinking of adolescents in Estonian society. Young, 14, 235-255. Doi:10.1177/1103308806065818.
16. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Karaiskos, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions about Health Education. Unpublished master’s thesis, Korinthos, Greece: University of Peloponnese.
18. Keeves, J., & Kotte, D. (1992). Disparities between the sexes in Science Education 1970-84. In J. Keeves (ed.), The IEA Study of Science III: Changes in Science Education and Achievement 1970-1984, (pp. 141-164). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
19. Koul, R., Lerdpornkulrat, T., & Chantara, S. (2011). Relationship between Career Aspirations and Measures of Motivation Toward Biology and Physics, and the Influence of Gender. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 761-770.
20. Koumparou, H., Kyriakoudi, M., Lykouras, F., Economou, S., Papacharalampous, I., Soule, I. Trimandili, M., & Mavrikaki, E. (2009). Το μάθημα της Βιολογίας σύμφωνα με τις απόψεις μαθητών Ελληνικών δημοσίων σχολείων δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης. Στo Θ. Κατσώρχης (επιμ.) , Πρακτικά Πανελλήνιου Συνεδρίου με θέμα «ΥΓΕΙΑ – ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝ – ΕΚΠΑΙΔΕΥΣΗ - Προβληματισμοί – Προτάσεις», [Biology courses according to the opinions of Greek secondary education students of public schools. In Th. Katsorchis (ed.), Proceedings of the PanHellenic Conference “Health-Environment-Education: Problems and Proposals”]. (pp. 68-76). Athens: University of Athens.
21. Koumparou, H., Kyriakoudi, M., Papacharalampous, I., Trimandili, M., & Mavrikaki, E. (2012). Greek secondary school students’ views about biology. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2): 217-232.
22. Krogh, L. B., & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 281–302. Doi:10.1080/09500690412331314469.
23. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313–327.
24. Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2011). How can we motivate high school students to study science? Science Education International, 22, 5-17.
25. Mavrikaki, E. (2008). Το μάθημα της Βιολογίας στη δευτεροβάθμια εκπαίδευση. Παραδείγματα και συγκρίσεις στο διεθνές περιβάλλον. Στο Α. Τριλιανός & Ι. Καράμηνας (επιμ.), Πρακτικά του 6ου Πανελλήνιου Συνεδρίου της Ελληνικής Παιδαγωγικής Εταιρείας «Ελληνική Παιδαγωγική και Εκπαιδευτική Έρευνα» [Biology in Secondary Education – Examples and comparisons from international education systems. In A. Trilianos & I. Karaminas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th PanHellenic Conference of the Greek Pedagogical Society “Greek Pedagogical and Educational Research”], (pp. 1165-1171). Athens: Atrapos.
26. Mavrikaki, Ε., Gouvra, Μ., & Kampouri, Α. (2007a). Βιολογία Α΄ Γυμνασίου. [Biology 1st Gymnasium]. Athens: Patakis & Paedagogical Institute. (in Greek).
27. Mavrikaki, Ε., Gouvra, Μ., & Kampouri, Α. (2007b). Βιολογία Γ΄ Γυμνασίου – Βιβλίο μαθητή. [Biology 3rd Gymnasium]. Athens: Patakis & Paedagogical Institute. (in Greek).
28. Mavrikaki, Ε., Koumparou, Η., Kyriakoudi, Μ., Papacharalampous, Ι., & Trimandili, Μ., (2012). Greek secondary school students’ views about biology. International Journal of Environmental and Science Educatio, 7(2), 217-232.
29. Nisiforou, O., & Charalambides, A.G. (2012). Assessing Undergraduate University Students’ Level of Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviour Towards Biodiversity: A case study in Cyprus. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1027–1051. Doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.637991.
30. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2007). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World Executive Summary. OECD.
31. Pafili, E., & Mylonakis, J. (2012). A Demographic Presentation of the Relationship between Parents’ Profession and Children’s Education in Remote Small Islands in the Aegean Sea: A Developmental Approach. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(6). Retrieved June 15 from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n6p113.
32. Palmer, D. (2005). A Motivational View of Constructivist-informed Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853-1881.
33. Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 36-39.
34. Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chudá, J. (2007). Slovakian Students’ Attitudes toward Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 287-295.
35. Sevinç, B., Özmen, H., & Yiğit, N. (2011). Investigation of primary students’ motivation levels towards science learning. Science Education International, 3, 218-232.
36. Shihusa , H., & Keraro, F.N. (2009). Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Students’ Motivation in Learning Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), 413-420.
37. Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010, March). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. University of Oslo. (Retrieved June 3, from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf).
38. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
39. Trumper, R. (2006). Factors Affecting Junior High School Students’ Interest in Biology. Science Education International, 17, 31-48.
40. Tuan, H.L., Chin C.C., & Shieh S.H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 6, 639-654.
41. Tuan, H.L., Chin, C.C., & Tsai, C.C. (2003). Promoting Students’ Motivation in Learning Physical Science – An Action Research Approach. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in science Teaching, Philadelphia.
42. Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159-2179.
43. Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L.B., & Eccles, J.S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: implications for cognitive development. In A. McGillicuddy-De Lisi & R. De Lisi (Eds.), Biology, Society, and Behavior: the development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 93-124). Westport, CT: Ablex.
44. Zeyer, A. (2010). Motivation to Learn science and Cognitive Style. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(2), 121-128.