DO PRIMARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS CONNECT TO REAL LIFE? : THE CASE OF GERMANY AND TURKEY

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to analyze the relationship between real-life activities in German and Turkey primary school 4th-grade mathematics textbooks, according to the classification proposed by Gainsburg (2008). For this purpose, document analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The data source of the research is "Fredo 4 Mathematics" in Germany and "Primary School 4th Grade Mathematics Textbook" in Turkey. In the research, descriptive analysis was used in the analysis of the data, and the results were reflected in frequency and percentage tables. The results of the research show that the activities in the mathematics textbooks of both countries are mostly "classical word problems" and the problems include real contexts. It has been revealed that the mathematics textbooks of both countries are strong in terms of activities such as "applied mathematical representations", and the number of activities in the type of real data analysis should be increased.

Keywords

• Primary school textbooks
• Germany
• Turkey
• Real life connections
• Mathematics

References

1. Altay, M. K., Erhan, G. K., & Batı, E. (2020). Contexts used for real life connections in mathematics textbook for 6 th graders. Ilkogretim Online, 19(1), 310-323.
2. Altay, M. K., Yalvaç, B., & Yeltekin, E. (2017). 8th grade student's skill of connecting mathematics to real life. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(10), 158-166.
3. Balins, M., Dürr, Rita., Franzen- Stephan, N., Gerstner, P., Plötzer, U., Strothmann, A., Torke, M., & Verboom, L. (2019). Fredo 4 mathematik. Oldenbourg.
4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H.C, & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), pp. 14-17, 20-22, 43-46. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/65072
5. Bekiroğlu, D. & Ütkür-Güllühan, N. (2022). “İlkokul matematik ders kitabi etkinliklerinin gerçek hayatla ilişkilendirilmesine yönelik betimsel bir analiz: Yunanistan örneği”. (Ed.) Altunok, B. & Cojocaru, M. 2. International Hasankeyf Scıentıfıc Studies and Innovation Congress (43-44).
6. Bingölbali, E. & Coşkun, M. (2016). İlişkilendirme becerisinin matematik öğretiminde kullanımının geliştirilmesi için kavramsal çerçeve önerisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(183), 233-249.
7. Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H. W., & Niss, M. (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education. New York: Springer.
8. Bosse, M. J. (2003). The beauty of “and” and “or”: Connections within mathematics for students with learning differences. Mathematics and Computer Education, 37(1), 105- 114.

9. Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Franke, M. L. & Zeringue, J. K. (2005). Algebra in elementary school: developing relational thinking. ZDM, 37(1), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655897
10. Cabassut, R., Wagner, A. (2011). Modelling at primary school through a french–german comparison of curricula and textbooks. In: Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R., Stillman, G. (Eds) Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0910-2_54
11. Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, V. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9-35.
12. Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 199-219. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9070-8
13. Greer, B. (1997). Modeling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and instruction, 7(4), 293-307.
14. Haas, B., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2020). Connecting the real world to mathematical models in elementary schools in Luxemburg. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 40(2), 1-6.
15. Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). The realistic of mathematic educational approach to enhancing ability mathematical connections. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(4), 179-183.
16. Huang, H. M. E. (2004). The impact of context on children's performance in solving everyday mathematical problems with real-world settings. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18(4), 278-292.
17. Kayapınar, A., Şahin, N., Erdem, G., Şentürk, Şentürk-Leylek, B. (2019). İlkokul 4.sınıf matematik ders kitabı. Milli Eğitim Yayınları.
18. Lee, J. E. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers’ perceptions of real-life connections reflected in posing and evaluating story problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(6), 429-452.
19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
20. Mosvold, R., & Fauskanger, J. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2-3), 43-61.
21. NCTM, Principles (2000). Standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
22. Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2007). Making connections and seeking understanding: Mathematical tasks in English, French and German textbooks. Paper presentation at AERA, 7. http://www.mkit.maths-ed.org.uk/MKiT5_Pepin&Haggarty.pdf OECD (2019). Pisa test. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/
23. Özgeldi, M., & Osmanoğlu, A. (2017). Connecting mathematics to real life: An investigation on how prospective secondary mathematics teachers build real-life connections. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 8(3), 438-458.
24. Rasila, A., Malinen, J., & Tiitu, H. (2015). On automatic assessment and conceptual understanding. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 34(3), 149-159.
25. Sawyer, N., & McDonald, J. (2008). A review of mathematical models used to determine sperm donor limits for infertility treatment. Fertility and sterility, 90(2), 265-271.
26. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teaching, 77(1), 20-26.
27. Smith, C., & Morgan, C. (2016). Curricular orientations to real-world contexts in mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 27(1), 24-45.
28. Wach, E., & Ward, R. (2013). Learning about qualitative document analysis.
29. Yekrek, E., & Özgeldi, M. (2019, September). Ortaokul matematik ders kitaplarının konuya giriş bölümlerinin gerçek hayat ilişki ve bağlamları kapsamında incelenmesi. In 4th International Symposium of Turkish Computer and Mathematics Education (pp. 26-28).
30. Yilmaz, Z., & Özyigit, S. E. (2017). Analysis of real-world problems in mathematics textbooks of early twentieth and twenty-first century Turkish education: political and social reflections. BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics, 32(2), 171-182.