Exploring Organizational Perspectives on Sustainable Development: A Comparative Study of Companies in Dubai and Istanbul

Year 2023, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 47 - 52, 21.09.2023

Basheer Bambouk , Tuğbay Burçin Gümüş , Gözde Ulutagay

https://doi.org/10.61150/ijonfest.2023010105

Abstract

This research presents the findings of a study on the perceptions of sustainable development among companies in Dubai and Istanbul. It starts by providing an overview of the definitions, objectives, benefits, and requirements of sustainability, also highlighting some examples of best practices in this area. Then presents the results of a questionnaire survey that has been conducted to gather the views of companies on sustainable development and compare them. The main point of this research is to acknowledge the perspectives of companies in Dubai and Istanbul on sustainable development. This study aims to identify the sustainable development challenges that companies are currently facing and may face in the future, from an organizational perspective. It also aims to examine how companies can address these challenges in a way that benefits both their own operations and the larger society by contributing to sustainable development. The focus of the research is on understanding how companies can address these challenges from within their own organizational structures and practices. The survey results reveal similarities and differences in sustainability practices between Istanbul and Dubai. Istanbul-based companies prioritize customer-focused sustainability, while Dubai-based companies excel in sustainable operations. Istanbul ranked first in ethics and safety, while Dubai focused more on environmental impact. Both cities prioritize a safe work environment, but Istanbul focuses on employee engagement, while Dubai prioritizes energy efficiency and ethical sourcing. Common barriers include a lack of awareness, difficulty finding sustainable suppliers, and regulatory restrictions. Dubai companies perceive the higher implementation of sustainable strategies and measurable results. Regular evaluation, sharing of best practices, and alignment of sustainability priorities can drive improvements. Companies need to consider their unique context and challenges to effectively integrate sustainability into their business strategies, and overcome barriers. Collaboration, education, and stakeholder engagement are crucial for fostering a more sustainable future in both Istanbul and Dubai.

Keywords

Sustainability, Organizational, Development

References

• [1] WCED 2002. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, 16,49,54,270,276.
• [2] American Management Association 2007. Creating a Sustainable Future: A Global Study of Current Trends and Possibilities 2007-2017, 7.
• [3] D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, W. W. Behrens III 1972. The Limits to Growth, 48.
• [4] United Nations Agenda 21 1992. Declaration of the 1992 Rio Conference on Environment and Development, 1-4.
• [5] T. Jackson, L. Michaelis 2003. Policies for Sustainable Consumption, Report to the Sustainable Development Commission, 75-81.
• [6] WHO Regional Office for Europe 2002. Community Participation in Local Health & Sustainable Development European sustainable development & health series, 15.
• [7] M. Pavlova 2009. Technology and Vocational Education for Sustainable Development: Empowering Individuals for the Future, 59.
• [8] M. Shahbazpour, R. H. Seidel 2006. Using Sustainability for Competitive Advantage, 285-294.
• [9] United Nations 2001. Uncovering the business case for corporate sustainability, 10.
• [10] C. O’Brien 1999. Sustainable production – a new paradigm for a new millennium, 1-7.
• [11] B. Ransburg, M. Vagasi 2007. Concepts and standards for the corporate internalization of sustainable development, 45.
• [12] J. De Ron 1998. Sustainable production: The ultimate result of continuous improvement, 101-109.
• [13] J. W. Sutherland, J. L. Rivera, K. L. Brown, M. Law, M. J. Hutchins, T. L. Jenkins, and K. R. Haapala 2008. Challenges for the Manufacturing Enterprise to Achieve Sustainable Development, 13-16.
• [14] C. A. Rusinko 2007. Green Manufacturing: An Evaluation of Environmentally Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Competitive Outcomes, 50.
• [15] E. Westkämper, L. Alting, G. Arndt 2000. Life Cycle Management and Assessment: Approaches and Visions towards Sustainable Manufacturing, 501-522. [16] S. Seuring, M. Müller 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management, 1700-1709.
• [17] Capgemini 2008. Future Supply Chain 2016: Serving Consumers in a Sustainable Way, 38-45.